- First Name
- Bennie
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2022
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 31
- Location
- Bardstown, KY
- Vehicle(s)
- Maverick
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
My upgrade with pretty fast about 10 minutes or less
Sponsored
I know what your saying and agree, however FM radio quality is not an issue in any other vehicle I drive or ride in. I live in metro Detroit so transmission towers fairly close in proximity. Daughter has 22 Bronco Sport and FM radio sounds great (it is a higher version of Sync). Wife has 2019 Flex and never thought twice about FM reception/quality. My old 2011 Edge had no issues with FM quality. Hell, my GMC work van has no issues at all with FM radio quality. I'm not looking for audiophile quality, just a consistent sound that does not drop fidelity as I drive along.LOL! That's a problem from the source. FM Radio has turned into overcompressed, low bit-rate garbage for most of the stations around me. Even with my high end home stereo tuner, nothing really sounds good anymore, except for NPR and one local listener supported station (WRFG). The feeds that most use now are worse than 128k MP3 quality.
From a long term IT network guy. 2.4 GHz connection travels farther at lower speeds, while 5 GHz frequencies provide faster speeds at shorter range. Your choice of 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz will depend on where and how you use your WiFi connection most. 2.4GHz also tends to provide greater compatibility across legacy devices.Move it further away. I have found 5Ghz works better when the devices have some space between them. I run two 5Ghz networks in the house: one for IoT devices and one for everything else. My laptop will seem to always have a better connection to the access point further away. No idea why.
I am definitely claiming some ignorance on this and I am interested to learn: what made you decide on a separate 5Ghz network for IoT instead of a dedicated 2.4Ghz instead?I run two 5Ghz networks in the house: one for IoT devices and one for everything else. My laptop will seem to always have a better connection to the access point further away. No idea why.
ISP access point is garbage but is required as it is also the modem. The Cisco WAP is a lot more open and can be set up to run through my PiHole. So, I put all of the IoT devices that require all the things the PiHole would block on the ISP access point and everything else runs through the Cicso one.I am definitely claiming some ignorance on this and I am interested to learn: what made you decide on a separate 5Ghz network for IoT instead of a dedicated 2.4Ghz instead?
That’s odd because your download progress should not have been lost.I used my phones hot spot for Wi-Fi. Connected ok but download stopped at 47% and disconnected after waiting around 15 minutes.
Tried again and downloaded to 100% and got stuck again. Had to start engine after leaving it sit for awhile because of low battery warning. Let engine run for 15 minutes and it never changed. Stuck on downloading.
Turned truck off and let it sit for 30 minutes and checked to see if new version installed. Nope. Tried to download again and download would never start, stuck at 0%. Will try again later.
Once it hit 100% it sat there for about 5 minsI used my phones hot spot for Wi-Fi. Connected ok but download stopped at 47% and disconnected after waiting around 15 minutes.
Tried again and downloaded to 100% and got stuck again. Had to start engine after leaving it sit for awhile because of low battery warning. Let engine run for 15 minutes and it never changed. Stuck on downloading.
Turned truck off and let it sit for 30 minutes and checked to see if new version installed. Nope. Tried to download again and download would never start, stuck at 0%. Will try again later.