I’d like to see the real numbers on an accredited Dynojet or Mustang dyno, and at what point the WHP and torque numbers converge on the graph vs the normal ~5252...
That would be very telling
.
That would be very telling
.
Sponsored
Sponsored
OP
OP
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #17
What's obviously deliberate, but not so obvious why:
The EV braking (regen) is 2x the power as the EV accelerating*.
Example:
EV regen brake: 70A and ~120 lb-ft.
EV accelerate: 35A and ~60 lb-ft.
The current is a constant limit.
The torque tapers inversely with speed.
*The exception is the first EV acceleration out of the gate on a cold start is 2x normal, if battery charge is there.
The EV braking (regen) is 2x the power as the EV accelerating*.
Example:
EV regen brake: 70A and ~120 lb-ft.
EV accelerate: 35A and ~60 lb-ft.
The current is a constant limit.
The torque tapers inversely with speed.
*The exception is the first EV acceleration out of the gate on a cold start is 2x normal, if battery charge is there.
- First Name
- Allen
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2021
- Threads
- 11
- Messages
- 355
- Reaction score
- 401
- Location
- Springfield Missouri
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 Grand Caravan GT, 2006 Mercury Mariner
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
What is interesting is the 0-80MPH run, a difference of .1 second according to the data presented 
OP
OP
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #19
Ya. The two versions of the truck are remarkably similar. I'd call acceleration equal for all practical purposes in all practical applications.What is interesting is the 0-80MPH run, a difference of .1 second according to the data presented
In short bursts, even the torque is basically identical.
- First Name
- Ed
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
- Threads
- 26
- Messages
- 1,228
- Reaction score
- 1,056
- Location
- Long Island
- Vehicle(s)
- Maverick
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
How can the Ecoboost go 0-90 in 15.8 seconds and also run a 1/4 mile in 14.5 @95mph?
Sponsored
other than a typo you'd have to ask fastestlaps.com. the 1/4 mile times compare to other testers.
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2021
- Threads
- 60
- Messages
- 1,798
- Reaction score
- 2,135
- Location
- Atlanta GA, USA (ATL)
- Vehicle(s)
- Fusion Hybrid, Mav XL Hybrid
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
Yes, numbers seem strange
Hybrid is a full 1.7 seconds behind to 60 7.6 / 5.9
But somehow catches back up at 80 12.5 / 12.4
And maintains to 90 16 / 15.8
But then falls behind 1.4s to 1/4 mile 15.9 / 14.5
- First Name
- Ed
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
- Threads
- 26
- Messages
- 1,228
- Reaction score
- 1,056
- Location
- Long Island
- Vehicle(s)
- Maverick
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
They were definitely brake boosting to hit 0-60 in 5.9 and some other witchcraft.
I’ve had 2 Ecoboosts.
Best 0-60 on 93 stock is 6.48
Best 0-60 on 93 Livernois tune 5.76.
Best 0-60 on e30 Livernois tune 5.6.
DA usually around -1000.
Happy to race you for pinksPEAK HYBRID SYSTEM TORQUE: 267 Lb-Ft.
Published Torque:
Gas Engine: 155 lb-ft peak
Electric Motor: 173 lb-ft peak
Unpublished:
Combined hybrid system peak output.
Tested:
Peak Combined Output: 267 lb-ft
(Computer calculated)
Achieved with high (4000 RPM) engine and low (20 MPH) Motor Speed. Peak Torque is with pedal to the floor, truck at 20 MPH.
University of Nebraska did extensive testing of OBDII computer generated torque values vs. dynamometer testing, and found on a 4.5L diesel engine, OBDII computer calculations were consistently higher, but just 2% higher than dyno.
I collected data via OBDII during two full throttle accelerations from zero to 65 MPH. I only had snapshot values at 1 second intervals so the peak may be slightly higher if it occurred between intervals, but the two runs matched pretty closely.
At highway speeds, torque was about 180 Lb - Ft.
The sweet spot: 20-30 MPH.
EB Maverick can sustain the high torque for as long as gasoline supply lasts. Hybrid Maverick will only be able to sustain high torque for 1-2 minutes, or for as long as the battery charge lasts.
But at least, I have demonstrated (to myself anyway) the hybrid is just as good, as the EcoBoost, for getting your heavy load/trailer going from a stop.
Hope you enjoy reading this half as much as I enjoyed testing it.
Of worthy note: there is a stored value in your truck, like the stored value for engine displacement and manufacture date. There is an on board stored value for 100% Torque Reference Point. The value in my Hybrid Maverick: 245.6 which is close to experimental values.
My first run I got a peak of 253.6.
My second run I got 267.
Sponsored
- First Name
- Kip
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2021
- Threads
- 154
- Messages
- 1,382
- Reaction score
- 1,999
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
- Vehicle(s)
- Toyota Rav4
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
What’s the torque driving in reverse?
- First Name
- Ed
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
- Threads
- 26
- Messages
- 1,228
- Reaction score
- 1,056
- Location
- Long Island
- Vehicle(s)
- Maverick
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
Looks like they created the graph from 1 source and then plugged in the fasted 0-60 and 1/4 miles for the Ecoboost.
The 5.9 on their site had a hyperlink and the average time recorded for the Eco was 6.49, the best was 5.9 (Car & Driver) and the worst 7 (MotorTrend).
That -1k DA sounds like the mineshaft DAs we sometimes have here at Maryland International Raceway....
.
- First Name
- Ed
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
- Threads
- 26
- Messages
- 1,228
- Reaction score
- 1,056
- Location
- Long Island
- Vehicle(s)
- Maverick
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
The hybrid was very fun to drive in Sport mode; less so in Eco. I tried hypermiling, yielded great results but hated it.
- First Name
- Ed
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
- Threads
- 26
- Messages
- 1,228
- Reaction score
- 1,056
- Location
- Long Island
- Vehicle(s)
- Maverick
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
We used to drive down to ATCO for a similar experience. I was able to hit a 13.97 with a JB4 and a -2100 DA. Perfect day for a run.That -1k DA sounds like the mineshaft DAs we sometimes have here at Maryland International Raceway....
.
Unfortunately all of the drag strips here shutdown years ago.
Sponsored
