That's interesting. I currently own three vehicles made in the past two decades that allow me to lock my keys in the vehicle if I want to, and I've never owned one that didn't allow it. None of them were designed to prevent it, so they all work the way they should. It seems to me that some people expect technology to replace common sense.Why does anyone have to prove anything? I have never owned any modern vehicle (other than classic cars) that would allow you to lock the doors when the key was inside. It's been this way for around 2 decades, when they started puting chips in ignition keys, and started using fobs for locking/unlocking of the doors. The door lock (manual, or electric) simply will not allow you to lock your keys in the car. We have gone backwards. We are forced to accept new "technology" that doesn't work properly. What was wrong with a key you had to put in the ignition, or door locks that did not depend on a computer to work the way they should?
Vehicles that sense the presence of a key fob require transponder remotes that the vehicle constantly scans for. Lower-end trims of economy vehicles such as the '22-'24 XL and XLT Maverick don't have that technology and I, for one, am glad for that. They are prone to security vulnerabilities and, considering that I've never locked my keys in a car, I don't feel the need for them. The simplest system that works is best in most cases, IMO.
Also, I never said anyone had to prove anything, I simply asked if they could.
Sponsored
Last edited: