Sponsored

New 2024 Ranger is definitely an option

OP
OP
OrangeBlue

OrangeBlue

2.0L EcoBoost
Banned
Banned
Joined
Oct 13, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
412
Reaction score
610
Location
Hogtown
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mav
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
First off, the current Ranger XLT Supercrew is about $5k more than the Maverick XLT Supercrew apples to apples. Not $13k.
There may be a hybrid.
New generation truck, so current reviews are not super relevant.

It's an option for at least a few people.

Higher cost ($27K to $40k), low MPG (20), poor reviews (but seem to be getting better), good towing, almost too big for my garage. Not for me; but go for it, if it floats your boat. LOL
 

TheQuixotic1

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Oct 11, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
141
Reaction score
269
Location
Cleveland, OH
Vehicle(s)
2013 Ford C-Max SEL. 2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
My 2013 C-Max is currently just under 147k miles. If I don't get a build date for my Ecoboost Maverick soon I'm staring down the barrel of needing new breaks, rotors, shocks, struts, and fluids flushed; all of which doesn't impact the resale value I'd get if I did it or passed that burden on to the next owner. Suddenly waiting for my Maverick becomes a few thousand dollars more expensive.

That 2023 Ranger that's sitting on the lot suddenly is looking more attractive.
 

Sponsored

Old Ranchero

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Apr 1, 2021
Threads
26
Messages
2,587
Reaction score
3,498
Location
CO
Vehicle(s)
2018 F-150 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2022 Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
You know, since it’ll be based on the Bronco platform, the manual transmission is a possibility!
Not likely. I'm expecting just same existing combination of 2.3L + 10 spd automatic as only choice for N/A through 2029 when product roadmap has cryptic reference to undefined EV.
 

snowcatxx87

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
656
Reaction score
1,215
Location
Calgary
Vehicle(s)
1290SDR EVO / Tiger 900RP / 300cc Grom / Surron
Engine
2.5L Hybrid

Tiger Dude

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Skip
Joined
Sep 21, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
521
Reaction score
667
Location
Louisiana USA
Vehicle(s)
2023 XL
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
First off, the current Ranger XLT Supercrew is about $5k more than the Maverick XLT Supercrew apples to apples. Not $13k.
There may be a hybrid.
New generation truck, so current reviews are not super relevant.

It's an option for at least a few people.
2023 Mav XL Supercrew $22595
2023 Ranger XL Supercrew $29585
2023 Ranger XL Supercab $27400
 

eRock92

Well-known member
Joined
May 24, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
174
Reaction score
260
Location
Virginia
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Escape SE
Engine
Undecided
The Maverick doesn't need a ladder frame and 7k is not out of the question. It's only 3k more than current. The Maverick already has the HP and torque to do it. Upgrade to a beefier version of the same transmission (which already exists) and add a little more cooling and it could do it just fine. The Jeep Cherokee can do it with a unibody just fine. In the 1990s people would have said an F150 will never be able to tow 14k either.
I doubt the Mav will get 7k towing. The Explorer with the V6 tops out at 5,600 lbs. Maybe the 4k bumps to 5k, but that's about it.
 

Tiger Dude

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Skip
Joined
Sep 21, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
521
Reaction score
667
Location
Louisiana USA
Vehicle(s)
2023 XL
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I doubt the Mav will get 7k towing. The Explorer with the V6 tops out at 5,600 lbs. Maybe the 4k bumps to 5k, but that's about it.
Explorers are no longer based on the Ranger, they are unibody now. This allowed them to compete with Pilots & Highlanders; the previous body-on-frame Explorers were hopelessly outclassed.
 
Sponsored

LM42

2.0L EcoBoost
Banned
Banned
First Name
Luke
Joined
Jan 21, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
761
Reaction score
1,158
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Vehicle(s)
Maverick XLT FX4 EB
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Explorers are no longer based on the Ranger, they are unibody now. This allowed them to compete with Pilots & Highlanders; the previous body-on-frame Explorers were hopelessly outclassed.
Isn't this exactly the opposite of reality? When I was with Lincoln through 2019 the Explorer was unibody front drive platform. The new Explorer is back to body on frame and rear drive platform.
 

Tiger Dude

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Skip
Joined
Sep 21, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
521
Reaction score
667
Location
Louisiana USA
Vehicle(s)
2023 XL
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Isn't this exactly the opposite of reality? When I was with Lincoln through 2019 the Explorer was unibody front drive platform. The new Explorer is back to body on frame and rear drive platform.
Pretty sure it's unibody rear drive
 

LM42

2.0L EcoBoost
Banned
Banned
First Name
Luke
Joined
Jan 21, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
761
Reaction score
1,158
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Vehicle(s)
Maverick XLT FX4 EB
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I'm pretty sure a few rear drive vehicles are unibody. At least a couple.

:sneaky:
I am sure you are right. But I am struggling to remember what. I think Ford had an old car that was based on a Euro version that was rear drive and maybe unibody. But I can't think of many others. But I had to check myself on the Explorer. The new one is RWD but DID retain unibody construction. It is not body on frame.
Sponsored

 
 




Top