No that is intentional. I see it all the time. It keeps people from sneaking up real close to the bed of the truck and they can't load what they buy in the bed. Now if he or she had parked it across on a diagonal or taken four spaces we would just call then Karen and box them in with shopping carts.
Dare you to copy/paste this post on a Ranger forum.Maverick grill looks more trucky to me. Like it much better. The big lamps on the Mav both front and rear give the Mav more visual mass.
Also I could swear I saw another Mav from a distance. Up close it was a Nissan Frontier. Basically the same size and stance as the Maverick. Mav isn't that small. But I think the Ranger has no place any more.
Nissan stock photo.
Agree, but all euro/australian utes have that weird short wheelbase with tailgate hanging way past the rear axle. Not a fan of that compared to full-size trucks where the rear axle isn’t right behind the cab.
This has to be one of the most boneheaded things I've ever heard. If someone is so worried about another vehicle blocking their bed they should park nose first in the spot. Still selfish Karen behavior. They either have zero spatial intelligence or they just think the world revolves around them.
There's absolutely a place for mid-size trucks like Ranger. Sales numbers hold steady year after year. They are the next logical step up when you need more Truck capability than entry level unibody vehicles like Maverick can provide.Maverick grill looks more trucky to me. Like it much better. The big lamps on the Mav both front and rear give the Mav more visual mass.
Also I could swear I saw another Mav from a distance. Up close it was a Nissan Frontier. Basically the same size and stance as the Maverick. Mav isn't that small. But I think the Ranger has no place any more.
Nissan stock photo.
But....
They live in TX, where parking isn't tested during the driving test.
The Ranger was rushed to market her in the US, and did not following the US truck styling. The next Ranger will look more like the F-150 and Maverick.Maverick grill looks more trucky to me. Like it much better. The big lamps on the Mav both front and rear give the Mav more visual mass.
Also I could swear I saw another Mav from a distance. Up close it was a Nissan Frontier. Basically the same size and stance as the Maverick. Mav isn't that small. But I think the Ranger has no place any more.
Nissan stock photo.
But the midsized market came before the small unibody market? Thing is the old Ranger could have a 7ft bed and and tow up to 6000lbs and haul 1500lbs. I fully believe that They could have met the current rangers capacities aswell as having 4 doors while maintaining the overall size. The Maverick has more interior room than the current ranger. Aside from making it about 3" taller putting it on a frame capable of ranger specs it could have stayed small. It would have had to been priced closer to the current ranger price though. But bigger is better in America and thats what we got.
I think it is a major major helping of both. These are the folks that drive through the parking space and then park only partway into the next. Like their SUV is as long and an F-250 four door.
The current ranger is the taco fighter /colorado fighter and will be going forward . The only knock I see on current ranger is the backseat space and front headlights .
