305 whp / 342 lb-ft Dyno Numbers from Modified EcoBoost Maverick

[R785_2022]

It would be interesting to know what a Maverick would do just the air intake and full exhaust( downpipe to tip).

Seems like a lot of people that can't afford a lot and are reliant on their warranty at least for now, would just be interested in basic air in/ air out upgrades. That way you can say that you are still all stock motor but as good as stock can be. Would also be awesome if Ford would sell a kit like that with their own tuning to manage the torque to keep the trans cool.

It would be interesting to know what a Maverick would do just the air intake and full exhaust( downpipe to tip).

Seems like a lot of people that can't afford a lot and are reliant on their warranty at least for now, would just be interested in basic air in/ air out upgrades. That way you can say that you are still all stock motor but as good as stock can be. Would also be awesome if Ford would sell a kit like that with their own tuning to manage the torque to keep the trans cool.

I'm at about 46k so far. Tuned since about 1000 miles, and I've had the 3" turboback on along with a custom e-tune (93 octane) for about 10,000. I don't drive very reserved and have not had any transmission issues yet. Actually ran the rear tires completely bald within the last 10000 miles (about 3 months) because I didn't make time to rotate the tires. This is completely subjective, but I would guess somewhere in the realm of 260/270whp to all 4 tires. I don't think an intake would offer much more. The tune is definitely the best bang for your buck.

Sponsored

 

[Azmig88]

10/10/23
UPDATE
​

DYNO #2 today
I added the Fast Mavericks CRT50 turbo and catted downpipe.
New numbers=
349 WHP
About 150 horsepower MORE than stock
386 Torque

Yah°°°oooo0000OOOOO

 

[R785_2022]

10/10/23
UPDATE
​

DYNO #2 today
I added the Fast Mavericks CRT50 turbo and catted downpipe.
New numbers=
349 WHP
About 150 horsepower MORE than stock
386 Torque

Yah°°°oooo0000OOOOO

Is this with 93 octane?!

 

[Azmig88]

E30
Mix it at the pump and pay less
2/3 Premium
1/3 E85

There are stations that have E30, but none near me.

This truck is UNNN-effin’-believable now!!!!

 

[colinl]

E30
Mix it at the pump and pay less
2/3 Premium
1/3 E85

There are stations that have E30, but none near me.

This truck is UNNN-effin’-believable now!!!!

Pump E30 for me is a mix of E85 and unleaded 87 that results in 93 octane. But since local premium is only 91 octane, it might be better. It's definitely cheaper thanks to the E85 subsidy.

 

[Maverickman74]

E30
Mix it at the pump and pay less
2/3 Premium
1/3 E85

There are stations that have E30, but none near me.

This truck is UNNN-effin’-believable now!!!!

Sooo what your saying is that I should swap the 2.0 Ecoboost out of my Maverick into a 69 Mustang and it would run like Boss 429 or SCJ!?!?!


Seriously these motors have me thinking of things like my 1980 AMC Eagles project. Instead of building up a 4.0 turbo or 5.2/5.9 ZJ Magnum swapping it. I should really keep my eye out for a totalled Bronco 2.3 MT and build it up like this. Just awesome!!!

 

[edrenaline]

10/10/23
UPDATE
​

DYNO #2 today
I added the Fast Mavericks CRT50 turbo and catted downpipe.
New numbers=
349 WHP
About 150 horsepower MORE than stock
386 Torque

Yah°°°oooo0000OOOOO

What's your full exhaust setup? I was looking at the Thermal R&D catback and Buschur downpipe from Fast Mavericks, but trying to get confirmation they work together with no other mods.

 

[Azmig88]

Everything was from Fast Mavericks
So you know: There is NO such thing as a Buschur downpipe from Fast Mavericks. Fast Mavericks designs their own and has it manufactured.

 

[Guv]

Where is this Dyno physically located?
Any near Bay Area California?

Would be nice to put a stock Hybrid on it.

Computer calculated hybrid Torque came to 267 lb-ft in mine. Would be neat to physically test it.

Will a Mustang Dyno read that low

 

[Azmig88]

Will a Mustang Dyno read that low

I’d suggest asking the place that does the Dyno testing.
That’d be best

 

[Johnkn]

The OPs numbers are stout. My experience with both Mustang (brand) dynos and DynoJet dynos with my Vipers and other cars is that (all things being equal) the Mustang dyno would generally read as much as ~10% lower.

Good luck


.

 

[Azmig88]

The OPs numbers are stout. My experience with both Mustang (brand) dynos and DynoJet dynos with my Vipers and other cars is that (all things being equal) the Mustang dyno would generally read as much as ~10% lower.

Good luck


.

That is my understanding as well

Sponsored