Sponsored

2.0 EcoBoost engine -- overall feedback?

Blokcar

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Blake
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
103
Reaction score
194
Location
Panama City Beach, FL
Vehicle(s)
Ford Maverick XLT Ecoboost
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
these engines are great, they have been around long before the Maverick and there is no problem with acceleration.
Sponsored

 

twindux

2.0L EcoBoost
Active member
Joined
May 19, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
31
Reaction score
42
Location
portland, or
Vehicle(s)
24 maverick xlt
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I like your approach to on-ramps. I wish everyone understood how to merge... 🤷‍♂️

These trucks are plenty quick. When you want to get somewhere, they will get up and go. The powertrain really seems to want to reach higher than its 108mph top speed.

IMHO the caveat to all this peppiness is a combination of transmission programming and turbo lag. The lag is not egregious, but it exists, despite the engineering efforts and opinions otherwise. The transmission is a much bigger issue for me, and as an example, if you need to change lanes and accelerate in a hurry - when you floor it, you get a "deep breathhhh aaandd... GO!" There is a definite pause and pucker moment before the gear change comes and you get max thrust. The good news is that both these issues are fixable with a tune, if you find them to be annoying and want to go that route.

Downshifting for deceleration is harder. Only the MY25 Lobo will come with paddle shifters, and that model would be the only way to do it without replacing the steering wheel and doing some wiring/programming. It's not impossible (several around here have done it on MY22-24s) but it is a decent amount of work. I really miss the paddle shifters on my previous vehicle, which were completely silly on an Acura SUV, but were really helpful for downshifting is traffic or coming up to stops.
I'm not an engine performance expert, but the turbo lag to me feels non-existent...much less than any turbo-4s I've had before (Volkswagens mainly).

Vehicle previous to the Maverick was a 6-cyl Huyndai Santa Fe which, even in that vehicle's "non-eco" mode and not being turbocharged, the "deep breathhhh aaandd... GO!" was far more pronounced. When I hit the gas on the Maverick...say to pass on a 2-lane road...I feel much more instantaneous response than with the non-turbo'd Hyundai 6

I will say the Hyundai would detect when foot off the gas going downhill and automatically downshift the transmission to engage some engine braking. Helpful on long hills. Plus the manual shift mode was nice at times, but I didn't use it often.

I was hesitant about the Ecoboost before I test drove it. Afterward, I had no concerns.

Plus, the gas mileage for me is far better than the Hyundai....6K miles in, and my city/hwy combined is at about 26 MPG...of late, my driving has trended more toward the curvy highways to the Oregon/Washington coast...but plenty of stop and go hours in town as well.

I could not be more pleased with the engine...or the trucket for that matter.

Just my experience, FWIW.
 

Mark S.

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Dec 10, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
91
Reaction score
111
Location
St. Jacob, IL
Vehicle(s)
2021 Bronco Sport
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Agreed, but if you look at the curves you only get that torque at the higher end of rpm's.
You get maximum torque at 3000 rpm, and torque slowly drops off to redline. I don't think the OP is expecting the low-end grunt of a V8.
You get maximum torque at 3000 rpm, but you get 90% of maximum torque (~250 ft-lb) at 2500. Go take a look at the torque curve for Ford's 5.0L Coyote engine. The 2.0L EcoBoost makes the same torque at 2500 rpm as the Coyote. The EcoBoost--like most boosted small-displacement engines meant to replace V6 engines from a variety of manufacturers--are designed to produce torque at lower rpm.

I suspect the issue @Decayed reports with low power off the line has more to do with heat soaking than with an inability of the engine to produce torque at low rpm. Heat soaking is especially problematic when using regular (87 octane) fuel. The powertrain control module (PCM) will not allow the engine to produce maximum torque with hot intake air going into a hot engine. After you get rolling and move some air through the intercooler, intake temp drops, and the PCM ramps up the power output.
 

Gray Goose

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
RG
Joined
Jul 14, 2023
Threads
21
Messages
1,036
Reaction score
1,822
Location
Wissota
Vehicle(s)
Maverick XL 2024, Escape 2012, GMC Terrain 2017
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Oh, there's a learning curve. Prior to my Maverick (which I just got on Monday), I've exclusively owned RWD V8 vehicles. There's definitely a different feel to power delivery with this engine. It is nowhere near as smooth in acceleration as my V8s (but the power is definitely adequate). It's going to take some getting used to, and I'll have to explore the different modes as well. So far (I've barely driven 50 miles) I've only used "Normal."
Agree with the different driving experience. RWD V8 is old school. Very few late model vehicles in that config. My last RWD V8 was 1974. Don't miss them at all. RWD V8 does not do well in Midwest winters unless there is extra ballast in the trunk. Most I see nowadays go in the garage in October and don't venture out again until May. But if I lived in the sunbelt, then maybe...
 

Phimosis

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Larry
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
1,180
Reaction score
1,518
Location
Santa Clarita, CA
Vehicle(s)
2024 Maverick Lariat FX4 4K tow
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
several people have told you it isn't turbo lag, it's the transmission. you aren't listening so I'll show you. this is how fast it makes full boost.
Apparently you haven’t been listening?

Seriously? Apparently you have reading comprehension issues.
The situation being discussed was with the engine turned off because the start stop function had just shut the engine off when he needed to take emergency evasion action. The turbo was spinning ZERO rpm. The transmission was in first gear. There was no downshift. There was no torque management applied from transmission programming. I forget exactly how he worded it, but something like “it was the scariest two seconds of my life”. Because it took 2 full seconds to start the engine and spool the turbo to 1.2 bar of boost. That is turbo lag. It had nothing to do with the transmission.
 

Sponsored

Blue_Max

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jul 31, 2024
Threads
11
Messages
1,581
Reaction score
3,897
Location
Orlando, FL
Vehicle(s)
2024 Maverick XLT AWD, 2001 Crown Victoria Police Interceptor, 1995 Mustang GTS
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Agree with the different driving experience. RWD V8 is old school. Very few late model vehicles in that config. My last RWD V8 was 1974. Don't miss them at all. RWD V8 does not do well in Midwest winters unless there is extra ballast in the trunk. Most I see nowadays go in the garage in October and don't venture out again until May. But if I lived in the sunbelt, then maybe...
I've lived in Florida for 34 years.
 

colinl

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Colin
Joined
Jun 21, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
5,440
Reaction score
6,176
Location
ICT
Vehicle(s)
'22 Maverick Lariat AWD, '22 Bronco OBX 2-Door
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Apparently you haven’t been listening?

Seriously? Apparently you have reading comprehension issues.
The situation being discussed was with the engine turned off because the start stop function had just shut the engine off when he needed to take emergency evasion action. The turbo was spinning ZERO rpm. The transmission was in first gear. There was no downshift. There was no torque management applied from transmission programming. I forget exactly how he worded it, but something like “it was the scariest two seconds of my life”. Because it took 2 full seconds to start the engine and spool the turbo to 1.2 bar of boost. That is turbo lag. It had nothing to do with the transmission.
I quoted YOUR words regarding lag. This is completely different than the autostop aspect of it.

You said that the only thing you dislike about the ecoboost is turbo lag. You then compared it to an Audi/VW 2.0 turbo which hilariously I have also owned and driven (a 2009 A4 Avant with the 6 speed DSG), and it has no lag, either.
 

Phimosis

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Larry
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
1,180
Reaction score
1,518
Location
Santa Clarita, CA
Vehicle(s)
2024 Maverick Lariat FX4 4K tow
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Yes, but it doesn’t change what I said. The lag you feel is not the turbo.

So yes I did read it. Still can’t figure out what you thought I missed?
Either you really didn’t read what he originally wrote, or you have reading comprehension issues.

He experienced a delay of something like 1.5 seconds as the turbo spooled from 0 rpm to 70,000 rpm to get to 1.2 bar and deliver maximum torque. That is my same experience with my Maverick. That is turbo lag. I had an N/A 2015 911 4S. Doing the same maneuver, it would go from 0 rpm to maximum engine torque with pdk engaging clutches at 4,000 rpm in something like 300 ms. Engine shut off to maximum torque in an instant.
 

Phimosis

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Larry
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
1,180
Reaction score
1,518
Location
Santa Clarita, CA
Vehicle(s)
2024 Maverick Lariat FX4 4K tow
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I quoted YOUR words regarding lag. This is completely different than the autostop aspect of it.

You said that the only thing you dislike about the ecoboost is turbo lag. You then compared it to an Audi/VW 2.0 turbo which hilariously I have also owned and driven (a 2009 A4 Avant with the 6 speed DSG), and it has no lag, either.
The start stop function was not the sole cause of his frustration in that scenario. The larger component was because of turbo lag. Even if he had disengaged the auto start/stop feature and the engine was running and idling at 750 rpm and the turbo was idling at 10,000 rpm, then he mashed the accelerator, it is going to take about 1 second for the turbo to hit its 120,000 or so max rpm. That is turbo lag. And yeah, that exact same lag is worse in the 2.0 VW and Audi engines. We weren’t talking about cruising down the freeway at 2,500 rpm and opening the throttle while the turbo was already spinning 50k rpm under light load. Decayed’s original comment was talking about an engine coming off of idle with the throttle plate closed. If I’m at a dead stop in my Tesla and I mash the throttle because I need to take evasive action, there is literally no lag. The lag of like 10 ms is how long it takes my foot to move the accelerator to the floor. 0 lb/ft to 500 lb/ft of torque in 10 ms. Do the same in a Maverick and it is 1500 ms to go from 0 lb/ft to 250 lb/ft. Why is the Maverick so much slower? Because of the turbo. That is turbo lag. I had a 911 4S with an N/A engine. If would do this same thing, with engine off at a stop light and I mash the accelerator, 0 torque to max torque would happen in about 300 ms. Not as fast as an electric motor, But it could do it 5 times faster than the Maverick can. Why so much less time to get to max torque than the Maverick? Because no turbo lag.
 

OleFordGuy

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Craig
Joined
Dec 5, 2021
Threads
38
Messages
3,771
Reaction score
5,908
Location
Alabama
Vehicle(s)
11 F150 Lariat, 24 Expedition Limited, 22 Mav Lariat AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
can we please move on from the back and forth turbo lag debate/battle. I don't think anybody cares at this point.
 
Sponsored

ejouie

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Evan
Joined
Sep 21, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
358
Reaction score
444
Location
Newnan, GA
Vehicle(s)
'23 Ford Maverick, Atlas Blue, FWD, EcoBoost, XLT
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
This is exactly why Ford has driving modes. ECO to keep the engine at minimal RPM for max efficiency, and Sport mode to keep the RPM high enough to always be in the power band.

I have to give it about 33% throttle to get the engine to go over 1800rpm in ECO while Sport mode will practically idle there.
 

Snox801

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Levi
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Threads
39
Messages
1,742
Reaction score
2,035
Location
Spring Lake Michigan
Vehicle(s)
23 F150-2016 RS/ 22 GT500/ rx8 x2/ 95 mustang GT/ 17 edge.
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Apparently you haven’t been listening?

Seriously? Apparently you have reading comprehension issues.
The situation being discussed was with the engine turned off because the start stop function had just shut the engine off when he needed to take emergency evasion action. The turbo was spinning ZERO rpm. The transmission was in first gear. There was no downshift. There was no torque management applied from transmission programming. I forget exactly how he worded it, but something like “it was the scariest two seconds of my life”. Because it took 2 full seconds to start the engine and spool the turbo to 1.2 bar of boost. That is turbo lag. It had nothing to do with the transmission.
Apparently you may also have that reading comprehension problem. It was stated multiple times in this thread that it was turbo lag. Did you miss that part?
 

Snox801

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Levi
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Threads
39
Messages
1,742
Reaction score
2,035
Location
Spring Lake Michigan
Vehicle(s)
23 F150-2016 RS/ 22 GT500/ rx8 x2/ 95 mustang GT/ 17 edge.
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
can we please move on from the back and forth turbo lag debate/battle. I don't think anybody cares at this point.
So your plan is to let people continue to say things that are not true and play it off as nobody cares?
I just want peopel ti be as well informed as possible. Thus making these minor details important.
May not matter to some but it does to others
 
OP
OP
AlpineKid74

AlpineKid74

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Graham
Joined
Sep 24, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
312
Reaction score
213
Location
Gaylord, MI
Vehicle(s)
2025 Maverick XLT
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
can we please move on from the back and forth turbo lag debate/battle. I don't think anybody cares at this point.
Yes, we got way off topic.
Now I understand to a point, do not floor it right away from a dead stop. Push down a little, get going, then push steady until I get to the speed I want.

In my original post, the entrance ramps to X-way are fairly long here where I live. I do not do 35 mph until I get in the #1 lane and then get up to speed. I get up to 70 mph plus (that is if I do not have a person going slow in front of me) before I get halfway down the ‘get on’ ramp to match traffic. My Dodge V6, Flex Fuel, 3.6 Liter does a good job of doing that. But will this 2.0 EcoBoost engine be able to do the same??

From what I am reading, the 2.0 EcoBoost should do what I need.

Never had a turbo engine before. This will be different.

Thank you for the information.
Sponsored

 
 







Top