You'll never make CEO with that attitude. You created this topic. You have control over it. But you're sloughing (yes, that's the word) me off, I guess because you can't defend your naive position.
You've acknowledged that it's an industry problem, yet you still blame Jim Farley personally for...
What's amusing is that your method for dealing with the problem is simply to fire the CEO. There's an extremely long chain of people, departments, policies, and labor laws between your unsatisfactory service experience and him. You gonna replace him with a service advisor?
I have bought five vehicles in my life. I still own four of them. The one that's gone was stolen and never recovered.
I won't switch before I feel like my Maverick is getting worn out, and I've had it almost 2 years and it doesn't even have 20,000 miles on it yet. I won't be getting a Fathom...
"Roughly 700,000–1,000,000 crimes aided per year." :) (Funny word choice they had there. You'd think they'd say they assisted in solving them, not that they aided the crimes.)
Then why make it easy for them? This is mass, warrantless surveillance. It will link more and more databases. You don't actually have to commit a crime to be declared a criminal or dangerous.
It has been documented that Flock's AI can mistake someone else for you and sends the cops after you to arrest you wrongfully. Also, it can help a cop who decides to stalk you (but for no longer than 30 days now, I guess).
How does Flock protect you?
And of course none of these companies notify you when they do such things. It is essentially impossible to hold them accountable for anything. Think about how difficult it is for you to contact a human with businesses that ostensibly have an interest in keeping you as a customer. Now, think...
More food for thought:
https://truthout.org/articles/a-vast-camera-system-now-feeds-information-to-police-on-drivers-across-the-us/
And while you're at it, look up Palantir and consider how an alliance between the two might work out.