Sponsored

What do you like LEAST about the Maverick?

tebowed

Well-known member
First Name
Ryan
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
212
Reaction score
286
Location
Virginia
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Lariat FX4 2.0T
I wanted the Lariat trim for all of the fixins that come with it...same reason I added the luxury package....however; the interior colors are hideous. I will learn to deal with it but I would have MUCH rather had options for the colors and fabrics on the interiors.

My other issue, and this is minor in the grand scheme of things, is that it is a Ford. Grew up in a GM family (grew up near Detroit - everybody in our family was involved in the automotive industry in some way) and getting one of these feels like I'm being a traitor. That being said, though, I was also considering a Toyota Rav4 Hybrid before this as well...
Pretty much this.
Sponsored

 

IndianaWildcat

2.0L EcoBoost
Active member
First Name
David
Joined
Aug 11, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
35
Reaction score
45
Location
Evansville IN
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick Lariat
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
No AWD Hybrid
 

Sponsored

Yardtruck

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jun 12, 2021
Threads
13
Messages
123
Reaction score
111
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Ranger 2006 Sienna 2016
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I have a 2019 Ridgeline RTL-E. I wish it had the in-bed trunk like the Ridgeline, but other than that, I think the Maverick has a better designed bed than the Ridgeline. More versatile and tougher too with the spray-in bedliner
The in trunk bed is another thing (plus the tailgate damper) that I like about the SC.
And somehow they managed to put in the trunk...with a spare tire under it!
 

Yardtruck

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jun 12, 2021
Threads
13
Messages
123
Reaction score
111
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Ranger 2006 Sienna 2016
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I helped my daughter move today and the big ticket items left on the list were her washer and dryer. I loaded them up in my '05 Ranger extended cab 4x4 XLT and moved them to where they need to go with no problems. We loaded them in the bed of my truck one in front of the other, dryer first and washer second, and they were transported with the tailgate up. There was enough room leftover we also put her microwave oven and floor-standing dehumidifier between the washer and the tailgate. On the drive to their destination point it occurred to me the bed of the Maverick would not be capable of loading a standard size washer and dryer end-to-end or side-by-side in its bed with the tailgate up. It will with about a foot to spare to the edge of the tailgate down, but thats the only way it could handle such a common size load for any truck. I dont haul a load like that very often, but I do on a semi-regular basis. This is definitely enough to raise my eyebrows and puts bed hauling capacity into some sort of context. Enough to deter me from considering a purchase? I need to think about it.
My current yardtruck is a 2006 Ranger Sport extended cab....so I feel your pain.

But what to do? Even the "midsize" trucks are big. And Ford is going to grow the next gen Ranger. Of course.

I don't understand. Everything has to get BIGGER without an increase in utility. When the new gen GM trucks came out I was really disappointed that it grew again. And of course the bed walls were higher.

WHAT NEW TRUCK WOULD BE COMPLETE WITHOUT HIGHER BEDWALLS???

After all...if you can get something out of the load bed..the truck is no good. Right?

Saw a guy at 7-11 with a clapped out early 90's F150 RC. Great truck. Lots of load. Human size. BTW, he has over 220,000 miles on it!
 

Yardtruck

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jun 12, 2021
Threads
13
Messages
123
Reaction score
111
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Ranger 2006 Sienna 2016
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I wish it had a trunk :(
Ridgeline style
That, the tailgate damper (I now have a really problematic back) and the AWD with base engine are what have gotten me interested in the SC.

Oh..and the bed steps..good for less nimble people like me and wifey!

I am not sure, but believe that the Maverick XLT AWD and SC SEL with base engine are real close in $$$. Why XLT? I need, I mean I need cruise control.
 
Last edited:

Wire4money

Well-known member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Jun 21, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
361
Reaction score
557
Location
Las Vegas
Vehicle(s)
2005 Wrangler
Engine
Undecided
That, the tailgate damper (I now have a really problematic back) and the AWD with base engine are what have gotten me interested in the SC.

I am not sure, but believe that the Maverick XLT AWD and SC SEL with base engine are real close in $$$. Why XLT? I need, I mean I need cruise control.
The Ranger has an aftermarket tailgate damper accessory that can be purchased. I’m sure the Mav will as well.
 
Sponsored

JohnHartshorn

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
John
Joined
Jul 30, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
358
Reaction score
440
Location
Metro St Louis
Vehicle(s)
21 Toyota Sienna XSE - Mav Hybrid XLT LUX Area 51
Engine
2.5L Hybrid

‘80F100

Well-known member
First Name
Jonathan
Joined
Aug 8, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
52
Reaction score
112
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
1980 F100, 1996 Ram 2500, 2001 Ranger, 2014 Edge
Y’all are entertaining. You want a cheap truck but want the features of a more expensive truck. Sure there’s some things that would be nice but at the end of the day it’s a $20K-$30K truck. The more available options there are, even if you don’t opt for them, the more complex the manufacturing becomes increasing cost.
 

bombast

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 24, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
663
Reaction score
1,377
Location
Pennsyltucky
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick XL, Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Y’all are entertaining. You want a cheap truck but want the features of a more expensive truck. Sure there’s some things that would be nice but at the end of the day it’s a $20K-$30K truck. The more available options there are, even if you don’t opt for them, the more complex the manufacturing becomes increasing cost.
That's true. I'd say the one thing I don't like about the Maverick (Or more accurately, the thing I wish it was more of) is that it's a 'Lowercase h' hybrid. It would be nice for it to have have a bigger battery/electric motor, maybe even going all the way to being a plug-in.

But of course, that's easily an extra 2-5 grand added to the price floor of the Maverick, taking away one of its nicer charms and making it far harder to choose over the already available crossover/SUV type hybrids I could go and find on a lot today (Or at least find on a current production list anyway).

Everything is a compromise. Half of buying a new vehicle is getting over it.
 
 







Top