Let me see if I'm following your logic on what a "truck" is. It has to be 4x4 no 2 wheel drive. Has to have enough ground clearance to go over stumps and heavy ruts. Must have front tow hooks to pull heavy vehicles out of the sand, mud etc.I don't think being a car with a pickup bed is a bad thing- the ride is way better than any truck I've owned in addition to tons of other benefits.
But I'm not taking my Mav mudding, I'm not going to tow people stuck on the beach, or exploring new-to-me overgrown old logging roads, etc. That would take a "real" truck. When you have to point out how Ford markets it to customers and styling cues to legitimize the terminology you choose, I think it's a stretch. Just my 2 cents.
This, had to give up the plates I've had since 2006, because when I got my Maverick I had to get truck plates.My state charges me for a truck plate not a car.
It's a truck!
You make a good point on the 4x2 comparison. I think of a truck and I think 4x4, that's my bias. I'd call a 4x2 a pickup but I can't say that's right, might just be a local thing. But of all the Ranchero/El Camino owners I've known none has called theirs a truck without joking lol.Let me see if I'm following your logic on what a "truck" is. It has to be 4x4 no 2 wheel drive. Has to have enough ground clearance to go over stumps and heavy ruts. Must have front tow hooks to pull heavy vehicles out of the sand, mud etc.
You just eliminated most every 2x4 half and 3/4 ton truck with standard lift suspension and tires produced by every mfg. since the begining of trucks. My father had a 73 2x4 6cyl F100 non truck truck by your standard. My 99 xlt short bed 4x4 could get me down a farm road/ rutted back road but mudding, overgrown logging road? No way. I would have ripped the bottom out.
The Maverick can haul 1500lbs(roughly) and tow 4k. Short bed unibody yes, SUV like yes. But still a truck. But that's just my opinion.
Well, once I get rid of the sorry factory HTs I can't wait to do all of the aboveI don't think being a car with a pickup bed is a bad thing- the ride is way better than any truck I've owned in addition to tons of other benefits.
But I'm not taking my Mav mudding, I'm not going to tow people stuck on the beach, or exploring new-to-me overgrown old logging roads, etc. That would take a "real" truck. When you have to point out how Ford markets it to customers and styling cues to legitimize the terminology you choose, I think it's a stretch. Just my 2 cents.
Respectable, to each their own. I plan on doing some off roading with a lift and bigger tires. As many have said the Maverick does enough truck things and for the few small comprises, it is the best value for the $$$. Also, honestly I would bet with a comparable equipped crew cab the Mav would go everywhere it could the only difference would be payload.You make a good point on the 4x2 comparison. I think of a truck and I think 4x4, that's my bias. I'd call a 4x2 a pickup but I can't say that's right, might just be a local thing. But of all the Ranchero/El Camino owners I've known none has called theirs a truck without joking lol.
When people ask about my Mav, I say it's a car with a pickup bed and go on about how much I dig it. I see no shame in it being just that. And I'm not about to argue with some logger in his lifted crew cab crummy over whether or not it's a real truck lmao.
I've used mine for a few dump runs but mostly a short work commute and road trips. Even the dump was a bit unnerving because if I run over something and catch a nail, I'm feeling a bit screwed having AWD and a full size spare that isn't full size. AWD is for cars IMHO.
All just my opinion because that's all this debate could ever be. It can be different things to different people, that's ok too.
What you describe sounds like a Jeep (original ones, not todays SUVs) to me. All about 4x4 and off road. Nothing about carrying capacity.But I'm not taking my Mav mudding, I'm not going to tow people stuck on the beach, or exploring new-to-me overgrown old logging roads, etc. That would take a "real" truck.