Sponsored

Anyone use Premium Fuel?

GPSMan

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Banned
First Name
John
Joined
Jul 28, 2022
Threads
52
Messages
4,325
Reaction score
5,340
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
Many
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
I only put in Top Tier, premium fuel per the manual. Same with my other vehicles.
This is a hybrid sub forum. Sorry, your post will be ignored here.
 

dhill59

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
David
Joined
Sep 18, 2022
Threads
37
Messages
410
Reaction score
572
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
2023 Maverick XLT
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
Premium in my part of the country is over $5/gallon. My Maverick drinks regular.
 

Halo9x

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Hal
Joined
May 4, 2023
Threads
2
Messages
823
Reaction score
692
Location
Abilene, TX
Vehicle(s)
Maverick XLT 2023
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
My first 600 miles already since 10/21 when I took delivery, this Mav is awesome on 91. It also makes ur engine run cleaner W/O any additives...Steven Chandler
It may cost more for 91-93 octane but if you fill up at 1/4 low then the cost is reasonable. Definitely don’t go past a half tank. Here’s my CO Mav.😊 I had this done to my jeans jacket.

Ford Maverick Anyone use Premium Fuel? IMG_0264


Ford Maverick Anyone use Premium Fuel? IMG_0262


Ford Maverick Anyone use Premium Fuel? IMG_0261


Ford Maverick Anyone use Premium Fuel? IMG_0248
 

GPSMan

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Banned
First Name
John
Joined
Jul 28, 2022
Threads
52
Messages
4,325
Reaction score
5,340
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
Many
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
It may cost more for 91-93 octane but if you fill up at 1/4 low then the cost is reasonable. Definitely don’t go past a half tank. Here’s my CO Mav.😊 I had this done to my jeans jacket.

IMG_0264.jpeg


IMG_0262.jpeg


IMG_0261.jpeg


IMG_0248.jpeg
Cool jacket.
Horrible logic.

It does not matter how many gallons you put in today. You'll spend the same amount of money per mile. Maybe you were adding sarcasm. 🤔
 

Sponsored

bgn

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 12, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
3,003
Reaction score
5,574
Location
WA
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Cool jacket.
Horrible logic.

It does not matter how many gallons you put in today. You'll spend the same amount of money per mile. Maybe you were adding sarcasm. 🤔
I think they were joking. 😉
 

Ozarkbeard

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2022
Threads
14
Messages
4,344
Reaction score
5,477
Location
.
Vehicle(s)
.
Engine
Undecided
I’m in socal. Have always ran 87 in my vehicles. With the maverick and it’s amazing mileage, plus what the manual says, I decided to use 91. The dealer filled me up and must’ve used regular because I just did my first fuel up with 91 and I feel the mileage is better and runs smoother
As the engine breaks in, it should run better and get better mileage. And as the computer learns your driving habits, that will also affect MPG and drivability. It's not likely from the overpriced gas you're buying...
 

Raymundo76

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Ray
Joined
Oct 15, 2022
Threads
66
Messages
799
Reaction score
793
Location
Mesa Az
Vehicle(s)
21 Mazda CX-5
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Premium in my part of the country is over $5/gallon. My Maverick drinks regular.
Why do you think Ford recommends 91 ? That recommendation does not make a hybrid more desirable does it; so Ford has no reason to recommend 91 other than that it is what they must think to be best for the engine. Of course it could be just a CYA. However , the hybrid gets such good MPG that the added cost of 91 is not an issue for me. If it is for you, use 87; but 5 years from now don't bitch if you have problems!!
 

Silverado90

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Sep 4, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
51
Reaction score
66
Location
St Simons Ga
Vehicle(s)
22 Ford Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I used all grades and cannot tell the difference with the hybrid XLT
 

Ranch

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Sep 19, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
928
Reaction score
1,011
Location
Sacramento CA
Vehicle(s)
2023 Marverick FX4 4K
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Why do you think Ford recommends 91 ? That recommendation does not make a hybrid more desirable does it; so Ford has no reason to recommend 91 other than that it is what they must think to be best for the engine. Of course it could be just a CYA. However , the hybrid gets such good MPG that the added cost of 91 is not an issue for me. If it is for you, use 87; but 5 years from now don't bitch if you have problems!!
What kind of problems do you expect for those who use 87 octane?
 
Sponsored

Waterick

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Oct 27, 2022
Threads
8
Messages
2,103
Reaction score
2,593
Location
Laurens county SC
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mav Lariat, '14 Prius, '83 'Stang, more...
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 

Waterick

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Oct 27, 2022
Threads
8
Messages
2,103
Reaction score
2,593
Location
Laurens county SC
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mav Lariat, '14 Prius, '83 'Stang, more...
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
The energy content of denaturant is about equal to the energy content of pure gasoline. In general, vehicle fuel economy may decrease by about 3% when using E10 relative to gasoline that does not contain fuel ethanol.
I know that to be true scienticfically, but I don't see any notable MPG decrease in our Prius when we run ethanol enhanced fuel. Run non-ethanol mostly because sometimes we don't empty the tank very often.
 

Raymundo76

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Ray
Joined
Oct 15, 2022
Threads
66
Messages
799
Reaction score
793
Location
Mesa Az
Vehicle(s)
21 Mazda CX-5
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
What kind of problems do you expect for those who use 87 octane?
I do not know ; use your imagination. We do not know how long the valve is open during compression, nor do we know what the actual compression ratio is. It is less than 13; but how much?. Ford knows all this tech info and they recommend 91, with the note that 87 is OK. (maybe just OK) Could they think there will be no warranty issues for them to cover if you use 87 (likely); and maybe they can sell you something (at your cost) after the warranty expires. That is possible. So an extra $.35 per gallon is OK for me. You decide what is best for you.
 

Ranch

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Sep 19, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
928
Reaction score
1,011
Location
Sacramento CA
Vehicle(s)
2023 Marverick FX4 4K
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I do not know ; use your imagination. We do not know how long the valve is open during compression, nor do we know what the actual compression ratio is. It is less than 13; but how much?. Ford knows all this tech info and they recommend 91, with the note that 87 is OK. (maybe just OK) Could they think there will be no warranty issues for them to cover if you use 87 (likely); and maybe they can sell you something (at your cost) after the warranty expires. That is possible. So an extra $.35 per gallon is OK for me. You decide what is best for you.
I have no idea if 87 octane will cause problems. That's why I asked you.

You think it's possible Ford says that using 87 octane is ok so they can sell you something after warranty? Interesting idea but I doubt it's true.
 

BradnChristine

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Brad
Joined
Nov 3, 2021
Threads
43
Messages
2,463
Reaction score
3,077
Location
Wyoming
Vehicle(s)
'23 Maverick Lariat Hybrid (towed); '25 Ranger Lariat; '15 C-Max; '20 Transit RV
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I have no idea if 87 octane will cause problems. That's why I asked you.

You think it's possible Ford says that using 87 octane is ok so they can sell you something after warranty? Interesting idea but I doubt it's true.
That simple 1-line in the manual encouraged me:
" For best overall vehicle and engine performance, premium fuel with an octane rating of 91 or higher is recommended. "

And since I plan on driving it less than 4000 miles a year (towing doesn't count), the $.50 cost difference for those yearly 100 gallons is only $50, $4.16 a month. I doubt it is really "needed", but given all the fuel costs I'm saving compared to the old S-10, I can certainly afford spending the $4.16 a month on the off-chance the Ford folks might be right.
Sponsored

 
 







Top