Same.I just want an AWD Hybrid!!!!!
I would be very interested in a hypothetical PHEV AWD 2024 Tacoma, though.
Sponsored
Same.I just want an AWD Hybrid!!!!!
PHEV aren't as efficient as we would think they "should" be.
They also run on mostly coal and natural gas (think where electricity is generated). I understand that the emissions are also largely over stated as they are based on the emissions of an engine at normal operating temperature. Quite often, hybrid engines are not operating that way because they start and stop. Over short distances, the engine does not, or takes a long time, to reach temperature and therefore have higher emissions. Has anyone heard this before?
Idk. I have a phev and with rebates it was less expensive than a lower equipped ICE version. I can get 2000-2400 Km per tank of gas, I do lose some trunk space because it’s an older style battery, but there is no loss of cargo with the modern ones in The escape PHEV for example. I for one would love a PHEV version of the maverick.PHEV aren't as efficient as we would think they "should" be.
I read an article breaking down the 3 different Toyota Rav4 vehicles- the regular, Hybrid, PHEV. Money-wise the PHEV was the worst of all of them, (by a few Thousand $$ over 5 years) when considering purchase price and gas money spent. PLUS the PHEV usually have to compromise storage space somewhere for that extra battery.
They said the hybrid was the best.
Maybe in your state it's mostly coal and natural gas, but not mine. My state is 54% Nuclear, and 10% renewables.They also run on mostly coal and natural gas (think where electricity is generated). I understand that the emissions are also largely over stated as they are based on the emissions of an engine at normal operating temperature. Quite often, hybrid engines are not operating that way because they start and stop. Over short distances, the engine does not, or takes a long time, to reach temperature and therefore have higher emissions. Has anyone heard this before?
That is absolutely not true. We have a fleet of Fords and one of them, our main transportation, is a PHEV Fusion Energi. We live within its range of all of our commuting needs and we can go 6 to 8 months without buying gas. Battery range is from 20 to over 35 depending on the load and temps. It takes about 90 cents to recharge the battery. We can then take the car on a road trip (which we do annually) and it takes a little over 120 dollars to go 2000 miles (it is a hybrid that can recover almost 40 miles of driving with regen) I can't say how dissappointed I am that they are not bringing out the PHEV. So much for ford leading the electric market......PHEV aren't as efficient as we would think they "should" be.
I read an article breaking down the 3 different Toyota Rav4 vehicles- the regular, Hybrid, PHEV. Money-wise the PHEV was the worst of all of them, (by a few Thousand $$ over 5 years) when considering purchase price and gas money spent. PLUS the PHEV usually have to compromise storage space somewhere for that extra battery.
They said the hybrid was the best.
And add significantly to the weight of the current Hybrid.PHEV requires more battery for it to make sense. That may raise the Maverick cost to a point where Ford isn't intending to put it.
Looking at the Escape, it does indeed to be at least 500 pounds additional.And add significantly to the weight of the current Hybrid.
60 mile range wouldn't be cost effective from a consumer's price standpoint or manufacturer's production standpoint. What would make the most sense would be for them to use what they already have.As someone that already has level 2 charging for an EV at the house, I would love a PHEV option for the Maverick with a 30-60 mile EV only range.
I get people love their mavericks but comments like this are hilarious.it would probably cannibalize the f150 lightning sales or at least what little there is.