I like your thinking Milqueman. I’m going to stop reading all these other posts about allocations etc.. and stick with this until it’s debunked by Ford. It gives me hope and I like that.
Sponsored
While I appreciate the time you took to make this post, it is based on a false premise.
Also you are assuming in your numbers that Ford received 35k hybrid orders. My feeling is that they received far more than that.
Maybe, but like I said, nobody knows for sure what the actual numbers are. I feel were all just guessing and getting all worked up.What you are missing is that Ford did not stop the Order Banks at 35k orders. Their are likely somewhere on the order of 150k-200k orders that were put in over the last 5 days. There are over 3000 Ford dealers and even the smallest of the small placed 10-20 orders. Mid-size dealers placed several hundred and larger dealers were placing over 700. Just the dealers here on MTC placed well in excess of 5k orders (and they represent less than 1% of all Ford dealers).
Ranger.Hate to say it, but I"m wondering why Ford didn't just raise the price 4 or 5 thousand dollars for 2023's. Would have increased their profits and still have plant running at capacity. Instead they're going to have thousands of dissatisfied customers whose orders got canceled.
My dealer told me today that Ford took around 100k orders total before they shut it down.So far I have heard from three sources that somewhere around 80% of the orders for 2023 Mavericks are for hybrids.
The Ford Video Guy said that about 80% of their hundreds of orders were for hybrids. That was covered well in this post.
https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/f...xlt-206-lariat-with-80-of-them-hybrids.20750/
There is a poll here that says that 72.9% of the 480 members that answered the poll had ordered hybrids
https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/forum/threads/is-your-2023-order-a-hybrid-or-ecoboost.20390/
There was also a post in the Facebook Maverick group by someone at a smaller dealership that said that 21 of their 25 orders (84%) were for hybrids.
Ford has said that they expect that about 35% of the 2023 Mavericks can be built as hybrids.
![]()
Despite some of the wild numbers being thrown out no one really knows how many 2023 orders have been entered but I think that it is pretty safe to say that they have a lot more hybrid orders than they can fill.
It could be that Ford managing the orders well and closed the Hybrid order book before there were way more hybrid orders than they could fill but when you hear about dealerships with hundreds of customer orders I tend to doubt that.
Ford has already said not to expect any sort of price protection like they did for 2022 orders if you do not get a 2023 order. The tone of that memo which also said they would close the order books early sounded a bit panicked.
I set up my preorder in July for my ideal hybrid when the order book was scheduled for August when little of this was known. By Monday it was pretty clear that even with long wait that the odds of me getting that 2023 hybrid were not good so I set up a second order for an Ecoboost with a different dealer. I hope I will get the Ecoboost by next spring if not even by this winter since only 20% of the orders are for Ecoboosts.
We will not be driving a lot of miles each year on our Maverick so the lower MPG does not have a huge impact on us and the Ecoboost will still get better MPGs than the pickup it is replacing so that can work for us.
It is not clear to me if you will be allowed to change your order from Hybrid to Ecoboost after the order banks close. If someone knows for sure it would be good if you could clarify that.
If not then today(9/21/22) is the last day that you can set up an Ecoboost order so you might want to consider if you should change your order to Ecoboost or enter a backup Ecoboost order if not getting your hybrid would be a problem for you.
Any thoughts about this elephant?
If 80% of those are Hybrids, then yes, Hybrid orders have cause for concern.My dealer told me today that Ford took around 100k orders total before they shut it down.
Anyone hear anything different?
Fair. But then the question from Ford's stockholders become, "why didn't you just put it in the Ranger if you were going to charge the same?"Regarding the ranger, there is no ranger hybrid. That's the big draw of the maverick.
That would actually be relatively good news.My dealer told me today that Ford took around 100k orders total before they shut it down.
Confidence? That ship sailed a long time ago. It sailed with the ships called Optimism, Trust, and Peace.I think we should start referring to them as "attempted orders". Calling them orders gives the misplaced confidence that they will be filled.
If they raise the price now, during a constrained time, then when production catches up (or competition arrives) they’ll have to justify a steep price decrease. That would anger previous buyers to where they could be lost customers, and it would look like a weakness to the general market. Essentially not worth it.Hate to say it, but I"m wondering why Ford didn't just raise the price 4 or 5 thousand dollars for 2023's. Would have increased their profits and still have plant running at capacity. Instead they're going to have thousands of dissatisfied customers whose orders got canceled.
Or they could offer hybrid customers the choice to switch to an EB. I would take that rather than no truck at all.That would actually be relatively good news.
Ecoboost orders would easily be filled.
If there are 80K hybrid orders they could make about half of them which is better than many people are expecting.
That would also leave around 50,000 Ecoboosts that could be sent to dealer lots and that would eliminate a lot of the crazy markups and flipping. With 3,000+ dealerships that is only about 15 per dealer on average but that is better than what they have been getting.
Judging by actions over the past couple years now on Bronco and Maverick, Ford isn't too concerned about losing customers...If they raise the price now, during a constrained time, then when production catches up (or competition arrives) they’ll have to justify a steep price decrease. That would anger previous buyers to where they could be lost customers, and it would look like a weakness to the general market. Essentially not worth it.