- First Name
- Josh
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2022
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 43
- Reaction score
- 92
- Location
- Oklahoma City
- Vehicle(s)
- 2.0 XLT Maverick
- Engine
- 2.0L EcoBoost
You are correct sir, it won't be relevant to 90% of people in this lifetime.You're making A LOT of assumptions...
"You and the guy from Utah somehow think these companies are investing in technology to profit from the EV trend (that governments are forcing on us) in areas with no population density."
Show us where anybody said that, or even alluded to it?
I'm not going to speak for others, like you seem to have a habit of in this thread, but the only thing I am saying is that I don't believe any of the tech you are discussing is really relevant to the majority of the population within the next 20yrs. I'm sure it will be implemented in small doses all over the place, but that doesn't change the equation for a lot (the majority) of drivers in this country. So in LA and NYC - yup - but I doubt it's relevant to me in the SLC suburbs (and this is hardly a rural area) and huge chunks of the rest of the country. EVs will progressively become more prevalent, but IMO hybrids aren't irrelevant in this country (even in California) in the next two decades. Anything else you say, is you putting words in my mouth.
What will be more relevant is if they have food or not.
Sponsored