from personal experience you're being generousThen you can show em that your full throttle race still got close to 20mpg, while racing! They probably got 12 at full throttle.
Sponsored
from personal experience you're being generousThen you can show em that your full throttle race still got close to 20mpg, while racing! They probably got 12 at full throttle.
I also never get any negativity. I have favorably impressed several young mothers who tote multiple strollers.I’ve only ever gotten “dude, how do you like that maverick? I’m thinking about ordering one” comments from others.
That said, I don’t even think it’s a real “truck.” It’s a Ute… that’s been crossed over with a crossover. All the benefits of the above categories with very few of the drawbacks.![]()
I love my 09 Ranger ( I get compliments on it from time to time and had a '99 before that) and kinda view the view the Maverick as the real continuation of the Ranger. I know it's unibody vs body on frame still though. With how big the new ones are they aren't even close to the same. The Maverick is pretty close in size which is what drew me to it.No one around me seems to care or know much about trucks. I had a few neighbors ask me if it was the new Ranger.
For some, envy turns into hate. Too bad for them, it’s their problem.Just some things I've heard detractors say about the maverick over the course of our ownership experience.
1. It's a focus based truck. Not really, it's based on a more capable and rugged version of the c2 architecture. It resembles more of a bronco sport pickup than a focus pickup.
2. It's not unreliable/poorly built. Basically all of the widespread data we have indicates the maverick in both Ecoboost, and hybrid trim, offers above average reliability. People bring this up a lot, like everything that's more affordable is somehow less reliable long term. The opposite appears to be the case, both with Ford trucks and things like Toyota corollas/Camry's. Cheaper cars ironically seem to be built better than more expensive luxury cars, speaking as an EX BMW owner here.
3. The maverick is a real truck. It may not offer the towing capacity of full-sized trucks, but payload is very respectable, surpassing some off-road versions of things like the tundra, and Silverado zr2. It can haul and tow more than most compact trucks from the 90s, the rangers and Tacomas. You know, the trucks the same people who hate the maverick are praising. It's like "Ah the maverick isn't a real truck, now this 1997 ranger that can haul five pounds before cracking in half, now that's a real man's truck". People like that who constantly prop up every old car, and bash anything modern annoy me to no end.
Sorry for the rant, let me know what maverick myths you've had to combat with others.
Exactly. Being on the C2 platform is more about similar configurations and less about the builds. Consider that the rear suspension of an AWD Maverick is independent and the FWD is not, as an illustration of the variance that can be seen on the same platform. While I haven't compared focus and Maverick parts I also expect there are beefier parts since the Maverick is rated at almost twice the load capacity (I'm doubtful it's just springs).Respectfully, I encourage you to read my post again. The focus uses the c2 platform, but each vehicle on the c2 platform varies by quite a bit. You have products that are far more car like, the focus, and to a lesser extent, the escape. Then you have rugged, more capable and stronger versions of the platform, like what the bronco sport has. Bronco sport is basically c2 version 2.0, and that's closer to what the maverick is.
I'm not against the c2 architecture at all, I think it's brilliant, and has proven to be a stellar architecture with no blatant flaws. Nor do I deny the fact that c2 started with the focus. But there are quite a few people who literally think Ford just popped a truck body onto a focus platform without realizing how much extensive engineering work went into making the maverick a strong and capable truck.
It's kinda like our other car, a 5th Gen explorer, it uses the same platform as the Tarus, but it's nothing like that car.
Great answer. I haven't come across the full size truck comment yet but I am ready to respond with: "I'm not going to buy a 458 Weatherby Magnum to hunt squirrels".Unless these “tough” guys on the internet forums and comment sections handed me a check of upwards of $50k-$70k to buy a “real truck” because they feel like they want to dominate my purchasing decisions to tailor fit theirs , STFU and enjoy your vehicle while I enjoy mine.
That's the problem with modern society. So many people are trying to compete, or one up each other. When they can't, they seek to belittle and attack others. I'm perfectly content with our maverick, I have zero desire to own some full size 90 grand monstrosity that you have to have a ladder to get into.Strangers say this to you? I have to imagine it's someone who is looking to bust your chops or someone who feels like they are competing with you in some way.
I'm sure that I could be classified as a "hater" at times in the reverse direction. As if I'm ragging big truck people (selling a dream that isn't really materialized by any truck) or those who want more luxury (commonly referred to here as the profit margin features/trims levels).I've used the label "hater" myself on rare occasions, and I usually cringe about having used it later. Boy it's an easy mean label to throw out on somebody during any kind of disagreement. And it's just not fair. I think the word "hater" ought to be banned online.
I think sometimes calling somebody a hater is itself an act of hate.
Or catch it and fling it backI'm sure that I could be classified as a "hater" at times in the reverse direction. As if I'm ragging big truck people (selling a dream that isn't really materialized by any truck) or those who want more luxury (commonly referred to here as the profit margin features/trims levels).
I'm generally just trying to counter act marketing that keeps trying to convince people they need things way beyond what they really need, just to get them to spend the $$$. If someone already spent the $$$ my counter against big marketing comes across as if I'm saying "you choose wrong". I get it, but at the same time it's really frustrating. All these behaviors are just that. They are weird little ticks, we all have in our subconscious that make us feel the need to defend our choices, our self image, our <fill in the blank>. Many times without realizing we do so at others expense.
This has existing since the dawn of time. Just manifests differently through ages and communication mediums.
We're all just a bunch of poo flingers. It's about whether or not you can counter act the urges
![]()