2.0 EcoBoost engine -- overall feedback?

[AlpineKid74]

If there is a Thread about this already, sorry.

A lot of the you are driving the Maverick with the 2.0 EcoBoost engine. And I would like to get some information/insite on how this engine runs. What to expect from it. Will it get out of the way if the driver needs to get going right now?

Example, the entrance ramps to X-way are fairly long here where I live. I do not do 35 mph until I get in the #1 lane and then get up to speed. I get up to 70 mph plus before I get halfway down the ‘get on’ ramp to match traffic. My Dodge 3.5 v6 does a good job of doing that. But will this 2.0 EcoBoost engine be able to do the same??

Has anyone had engine problems? This story at www.dailydot.com, ‘Ford Escape’: Mechanic issues warning on any car with an EcoBoost engine. Here’s why, https://www.dailydot.com/news/ecoboost-engine-car-warning/
The article is about where coolant leaks into the engine cylinder. Coolant infusion, especially in these engines.

Now let's go the other direction, I am coming up to my ‘get off’ ramp, it is fairly long, and the v6 will slow the van down a good amount before I need to apply brakes. I do not come up to a STOP sign/light and slam on the brakes like I have seen other driver do. Sometimes I will down shift to the next gear. Will the Maverick let me do this?

Thanks

Sponsored

 

[Decayed]

The coolant leak issue has been addressed with a redesign. You can google it but the head gasket issues were the last version.

The eco has PLENTY of power to accelerate., but it likes higher RPMs as do all turbo engines.

The only area where there is an issue IMO is coming from a standing start in my opinion. There are two related things that contribute to it.

1) turbos by design rob power at low rpms. Turbo lag is a thing and not just for fords. You can compensate by giving it a little gas before stomping on it. Once the turbo is blowing there isn't an issue.

2) auto stop start is the devil. I had my engine cut out on me once when I needed to scoot into heavy traffic. I was stopped at a busy intersection and auto stop kicked in just as I was about to hit the gas. As a result I rolled into traffic with basically no power until the engine restarted and the inevitable turbo lag was overcome and it started to go. Longest 2 seconds of my life. 2 seconds is a significant interval in heavy traffic. Ever since I religiously turn it off even on my new car. Blame the EPA not Ford for that.

I am not a fan of turbos. I'd rather have a naturally aspirated V6 given free choice. But IMO the 2.0 eco engine is one of the better things about the mav.

 

[OleFordGuy]

I will just say, the 2.0 is very peppy and will get you up to speed quickly. And if you’re not happy with normal mode, push the button and select sport mode and hold on. I think you’ll be surprised. It won’t match the 5.0 mustangs I’ve had but it’s not suppose to.
Had zero issues with mine, do your maintenance well, oil/filter change every 5k, full synthetic oil and tier 1 gas brands, think you will be pleased. That’s my experience

 

[Tbone289]

it likes higher RPMs as do all turbo engines.

That's not necessarily true. The twin-scroll turbo in the second generation 2.0 Ecoboost allows for peak torque at 3000rpm, unlike the first generation at 4500rpm. Torque is what you need for the "get out of the way" that @AlpineKid74 is asking about.

It's plenty quick, and it's fantastic in the mountains compared to its naturally-aspirated cousins like the Duratec 20 Ti-VCT.

 

[Decayed]

That's not necessarily true. The twin-scroll turbo in the second generation 2.0 Ecoboost allows for peak torque at 3000rpm, unlike the first generation at 4500rpm. Torque is what you need for the "get out of the way" that @AlpineKid74 is asking about.

It's plenty quick!

It's better yes but idle speed is like 750 rpm. My specific criticism of turbos is about trying to come hard off idle. You could have quad scroll turbos and lag would still be a problem.

Also, it sounds like OP's concern is the ability to accelerate on long on ramps and in that situation the ecoboost will shine.

 

[rlhdweman]

You will need half the distance to get up to speed with the 2.0 vs your 3.5 van, when you put your clog down in the Maverick I have had no turbo lag of any sort at any speed, it has V8 torque. As for coasting I find it does coast a long way, so you will have to you will have to brake more than the van or tap off the cruise a bit sooner.

 

[Tbone289]

It's better yes but idle speed is like 750 rpm.

Yes, but 3000rpm is not "high rpms", and yes, we're not talking about "off the line". You can only expect so much out of a 2.0 inline-4, turbo or not. 3000rpm torque peak at 277 lb/ft is pretty damn respectable, IMO.

 

[Decayed]

Yes, but 3000rpm is not "high rpms", and yes, we're not talking about "off the line". You can only expect so much out of a 2.0 inline-4, turbo or not. 3000rpm torque peak at 277 lb/ft is pretty damn respectable, IMO.

Agreed, but if you look at the curves you only get that torque at the higher end of rpm's. My specific complaint is applicable to pretty much any turbo 4 particularly one that has auto start stop. Together they almost killed me.

 

[Hunters Edge]

Why take social media views? I suggest you go and take a test drive or even rent one for a few days.

Not sure on downshift you will have to take your foot off the gas a ways away. The Maverick rolls a long way which incidentally helps in fuel economy. Once again though I suggest a test drive or rent one for a few days. It's an incredible truck, most likely the reason they are selling so well.

 

[Tbone289]

Agreed, but if you look at the curves you only get that torque at the higher end of rpm's

Yes, I completely understand that. You get maximum torque at 3000 rpm, and torque slowly drops off to redline. I don't think the OP is expecting the low-end grunt of a V8.

I think you and I must have a different definition of "high rpm" and I'll leave it at that.

 

[OleFordGuy]

To cure the auto stop start, I just push the button to turn it off right after starting the engine each time, that way it’s stays off and I don’t curse

 

[Carlitos_92]

I like your approach to on-ramps. I wish everyone understood how to merge...

These trucks are plenty quick. When you want to get somewhere, they will get up and go. The powertrain really seems to want to reach higher than its 108mph top speed.

IMHO the caveat to all this peppiness is a combination of transmission programming and turbo lag. The lag is not egregious, but it exists, despite the engineering efforts and opinions otherwise. The transmission is a much bigger issue for me, and as an example, if you need to change lanes and accelerate in a hurry - when you floor it, you get a "deep breathhhh aaandd... GO!" There is a definite pause and pucker moment before the gear change comes and you get max thrust. The good news is that both these issues are fixable with a tune, if you find them to be annoying and want to go that route.

Downshifting for deceleration is harder. Only the MY25 Lobo will come with paddle shifters, and that model would be the only way to do it without replacing the steering wheel and doing some wiring/programming. It's not impossible (several around here have done it on MY22-24s) but it is a decent amount of work. I really miss the paddle shifters on my previous vehicle, which were completely silly on an Acura SUV, but were really helpful for downshifting is traffic or coming up to stops.

 

[bgn]

Almost 3 years with my Mav and I've been quite vocal about what I dislike about it on here. I've had absolutely zero concerns or problems with the engine. I think it's an absolutely fantastic turbo option in this "second gen" after the initial coolant issues it had on the earlier Escapes.

 

[Toddman45]

This is now my fourth EcoBoost Ford. The first being my 2012 f150 XLT 3.5 l, second was a 2016 F-150 XLT 3.5 l, third was a 2016 Ford fusion 1.5 l and now my 24 2.0 l.

The only EcoBoost motor I had any issues with was my 12 XLT with the 3.5 trying to pass a semi on a two-lane road when at wide open throttle the engine had the fall on its face loss of power due to fluid buildup in the intercooler and it sucking it into the engine. My local Ford dealer gave me a loaner till they could get it replaced and fix the issue to never have it happen again.

This 2 l has a lot of pep surprisingly for a 4 cylinder I'm not one to drive like a nut, but I like to get up to speed before I get on the highway and this has no problem doing so it loves the GoPedal. I've only got just over 5,000 mi on my 24 and I've thankfully not had any problems with it and hopefully it stays that way cuz I plan to drive it till the wheels fall off.

As you refer to getting off the exit of the highway at the off-ramp and not liking to slam on the brakes I don't either. I usually let off the gas and kind of coast down to speed slightly before the off-ramp and then only have to apply easy brakes before coming to a stop. I've never had the slam on the brakes but I'm not one that flies off the highway full speed only to ride the brakes to the stoplight.

I think if you go with the EcoBoost over the hybrid you won't be disappointed in the power it has. Only downside versus the hybrid is obviously the hybrid gets way better gas mileage. I average right at 27 to 28 with my 2.0 eb.

 

[ejouie]

Sport mode is what I use in those types of situations. I normally run in eco and switch to sport when coming upon an area where I know that I will need to be able to react quickly. Sport mode keeps the rpms higher to ensure the turbo is spooled and ready. Throttle response is much quicker as it rarely needs to downshift. It usually already is in the correct gear.

If you don't have time to change driving modes, then make sure to floor it. It'll downshift and scoot. If you don't give it max pedal it might lethargically accelerate in ECO and refuse to change gears.

Sponsored