- First Name
- Mike
- Joined
- May 3, 2024
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 4,938
- Reaction score
- 4,521
- Location
- KC Metro area
- Vehicle(s)
- 2005 Toyota RAV4, 2024 XLT Hybrid
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
I agree. And I've not given alternate survival techniques.We keep parsing words here. It is a drain from the modules. Do you work for Ford. You keep defending them and giving alternate battery survival techniques. That's fine for an interim fix but not a solution to abate, mask or cure the problem. Well I'm done on this issue and making people aware that it is more than just driving habits, charging responsibilities and being the vehicles human computer.
Peace out!
But recommending calling Ford on that SSM about your battery saver features and deep sleep happening - will do little.
Because it's not the right issue. Just going to muddy the waters.
They'll just tell you to go to dealer for your actual issue since it doesn't fit.
Dealer may do nothing - because truck starts.
Hopefully they test battery correctly - and replace if bad. But it has to be bad enough for them.
But if you have a real issue that is a parasitic excess draw, but not a battery drain issue - you've just given them an excuse to do nothing and wait. Instead of tackling what could be a different issue and getting a hardware fix as several posters have shown needed to occur.
Would those bad hardware modules have been fixed by the SSM stated software fix? Unknown.
That's great you want to make people aware it's not their fault, or shouldn't be their issue to address. (frankly time is money - it's easier for many to make it their issue and handle it for now)
I'm trying to make people aware that perhaps they do NOT have the normal charging strategy issue, and the normal within spec micro-draw - and perhaps are being effected by the also bad quality battery that is worsened by the other issues.
Yes take it in if needed - but don't claim it's the issue in the SSM and give the dealership an escape clause. They can't do anything about it now anyway. And that's probably how it'll end after a battery test.
And it's not parsing words - as those mean things.
Yes it's a really massive draw from a module that drains the battery no matter the battery saver or deep sleep features.
But you may have noticed in the complaints about those features - rarely is someone commenting on drained battery, that they went out in morning and it didn't start, towed to dealer, and battery was drained, and may have ended up damaged when charged and tested - and got a new battery. There are some posts like that, not often.
Shoot - the number that take it in about the deep sleep responses, and it's discovered a bad battery cell, but was still working for starting - even that's infrequent. But more common.
Since the current even Forscan Lite can kick off a module reboot (which may or may not actually power cycle it), I'm betting the software solution does nothing but that.
Increase the logic in whatever module can read amps to other modules, if that exists, set the time limits and amount of expected micro-draw, and if anything goes above - reboot.
But perhaps that's not working in their testing, or not possible to enact.
Then just reboot modules if the drain is too much after so many minutes.
Probably knowing when a module comes back up it's power usage is higher than resting state for awhile - potentially another issue.
I really don't think they are going to address the charging logic, and probably not the bad quality batteries.
I think they got some cheap sensors that are wrong on the readings the logic is based on.
It's really the same logic being used for years by many makes/models - it's just not happening correctly here. Or they are playing it on the too safe side because battery is in a small cab.
Sponsored