- First Name
- Jake
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
- Threads
- 25
- Messages
- 513
- Reaction score
- 921
- Location
- Columbus, OH
- Vehicle(s)
- 2023 Hyundai Tuscon NLine
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
- Thread starter
- #1
The old Dodge DecrepitDid a comparison to my current & previous vehicles. I had base models. Content with the MPG of the XLT AWD 4k Lux 360 Ecoboost with Moonroof.
That Sonata is basically a rolling fuel tank with that 17.7 gallons.Did a comparison to my current & previous vehicles. I had base models. Content with the MPG of the XLT AWD 4k Lux 360 Ecoboost with Moonroof.
I got a lucky build. It lasted 11 years & 185k with no major problems. Had to get rid if it because it wouldn’t have passed Illinois emissions testing.The old Dodge Decrepit
Was thinking the same. That means the 2.0 with a 93 tune would probably post better numbers stock. And much better with a tune.I noticed that pretty much any vehicle you look up on the EPA site, some I KNOW the manufacturers suggest should use 91+ octane, the EPA says that regular fuel is fine.
I know you can run cars that require 91+ octane on 87 octane, but you'll get diminished performance so that's a bit misleading. The Santa Cruz for example its tuned so you get the full 281hp on 87 octane, and if you wanted to run 91 octane you could probably get 300hp+ out of it.
Just something to keep in mind, because there is quite a large price difference between 87 and 93, and I find it unlikely that the 2.0 Ecoboost is going to make a full 250hp on 87.