Sponsored

zeketolliver

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Jake
Joined
Apr 12, 2021
Threads
25
Messages
513
Reaction score
921
Location
Columbus, OH
Vehicle(s)
2023 Hyundai Tuscon NLine
Engine
2.5L Hybrid

CASD57

Well-known member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jul 12, 2021
Threads
18
Messages
625
Reaction score
664
Location
Meridian, Idaho
Vehicle(s)
2022 Hyundai Santa Cruz
Engine
Undecided
Official numbers finally,,,,,hopefully the hybrid is coming soon
 

bgn

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 12, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
2,122
Reaction score
3,496
Location
WA
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Finally...
 

LITH505

Active member
First Name
Anna
Joined
Jul 7, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
35
Reaction score
50
Location
NE Illinois
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Did a comparison to my current & previous vehicles. I had base models. Content with the MPG of the XLT AWD 4k Lux 360 Ecoboost with Moonroof.
Ford Maverick 2022 Maverick EcoBoost (2.0L) Official EPA MPG Rating Released - Confirms Window Sticker Figures EE02071A-6FC2-4F10-938A-4214256609FF
Ford Maverick 2022 Maverick EcoBoost (2.0L) Official EPA MPG Rating Released - Confirms Window Sticker Figures AD079D0C-4F40-4DA8-96D8-2DE9B92D8537
 
Last edited:

Sponsored

CoryDallas8123

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Cory
Joined
Jul 2, 2021
Threads
17
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,701
Location
Dallas, TX
Vehicle(s)
Audi A4, Chevy Chevelle SS, 2022 Maverick XLT
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
That's still pretty amazing for a truck. My dumb little A4 gets 22 combined!!
 

fishinmagician

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 12, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
342
Reaction score
443
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2022 maverick hybrid XL
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
Did a comparison to my current & previous vehicles. I had base models. Content with the MPG of the XLT AWD 4k Lux 360 Ecoboost with Moonroof.
EE02071A-6FC2-4F10-938A-4214256609FF.png
AD079D0C-4F40-4DA8-96D8-2DE9B92D8537.png
The old Dodge Decrepit
 

Big Kahuna

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
695
Reaction score
1,262
Location
WA
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
25 MPG for a small truck with AWD and TOWING etc is just fine by me. My Honda Element which has 90 less HP only gets 20-21 so I'm going in the right direction.

I was looking at used trucks and nothing came close to this one for MPG including most of the diesels.
 

FortyFiveNorthoods

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 9, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
97
Reaction score
106
Location
PNW
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick Lariat FX4 4K
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Did a comparison to my current & previous vehicles. I had base models. Content with the MPG of the XLT AWD 4k Lux 360 Ecoboost with Moonroof.
EE02071A-6FC2-4F10-938A-4214256609FF.png
That Sonata is basically a rolling fuel tank with that 17.7 gallons.
 
Sponsored

The Weatherman

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Dean
Joined
Jul 20, 2021
Threads
21
Messages
2,461
Reaction score
3,491
Location
KY
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Lariat Lux FX4 4K x 2
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Wonder when we’ll see the Safety Crash Ratings?
 

Down

Well-known member
First Name
Jason
Joined
Jun 15, 2021
Threads
12
Messages
473
Reaction score
717
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Vehicle(s)
22 Maverick/02 Z06 Vette
Nice that this will be a parallel/tiny improvement. I'm MAINLY happy though that since I have experience with a similar powertrain? I know that my driving style means I haven't, and won't, see anything close to these numbers. :LOL:

Ford Maverick 2022 Maverick EcoBoost (2.0L) Official EPA MPG Rating Released - Confirms Window Sticker Figures 1631825262449
 

JASmith

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Jessica
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Threads
68
Messages
1,598
Reaction score
3,744
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Dodge Ram 1500
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I noticed that pretty much any vehicle you look up on the EPA site, some I KNOW the manufacturers suggest should use 91+ octane, the EPA says that regular fuel is fine.

I know you can run cars that require 91+ octane on 87 octane, but you'll get diminished performance so that's a bit misleading. The Santa Cruz for example its tuned so you get the full 281hp on 87 octane, and if you wanted to run 91 octane you could probably get 300hp+ out of it.

Just something to keep in mind, because there is quite a large price difference between 87 and 93, and I find it unlikely that the 2.0 Ecoboost is going to make a full 250hp on 87.
 

Mav

Well-known member
First Name
E
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Threads
38
Messages
315
Reaction score
634
Location
Earth
Vehicle(s)
Lariat Maverick
I noticed that pretty much any vehicle you look up on the EPA site, some I KNOW the manufacturers suggest should use 91+ octane, the EPA says that regular fuel is fine.

I know you can run cars that require 91+ octane on 87 octane, but you'll get diminished performance so that's a bit misleading. The Santa Cruz for example its tuned so you get the full 281hp on 87 octane, and if you wanted to run 91 octane you could probably get 300hp+ out of it.

Just something to keep in mind, because there is quite a large price difference between 87 and 93, and I find it unlikely that the 2.0 Ecoboost is going to make a full 250hp on 87.
Was thinking the same. That means the 2.0 with a 93 tune would probably post better numbers stock. And much better with a tune.
what I really want to see is someone beat on one of these 2.0 AWD in SPORT mode and give some feedback.
I ordered the Maverick because I got tired of waiting for my Bronco. But a mini-sport truck would be fun.
Sponsored

 
 




Top