I was talking mavericks here. I wouldn't try to put my Mustang drag radials on the front either.The wider wheels would only fit the front. (W Body with the LS4)
Sponsored
I was talking mavericks here. I wouldn't try to put my Mustang drag radials on the front either.The wider wheels would only fit the front. (W Body with the LS4)
The correct answer.From the manual:
![]()
I don't think he kidding I have read the same thing, they say its not necessary BUT I do it anyway, it makes sense to me. Who's that old guy on Utube with the stupid laugh he says its not necessary also.You're kidding, right?
Ford dealers have a service offer called 'the Works' which varies in price by market, but for me it's around $55 for synthetic blend and $80 for full synthetic. I get my oil changed with an ecoboost every 5k - 7k miles, so that's about right on tire rotation. AWD models still wear the fronts heavily and will have similar wear issues as FWD models if you don't rotate often.Without saying what I think about Mr. Kilmer and the ideas he puts out there I can say that rotating tires is a must if you want to replace all four at the same time, with the same amount of wear.
This is especially true with a front-wheel drive based vehicle that always wears down the front tires faster than the rears because they handle steering, braking and power traction. The rears are just rolling along.
I rotated my original Continentals on the Maverick at about 15k miles when I saw a significant deal more wear on the fronts. By the time I replaced them all at 30k miles, they were all evenly spent.
The original factory firestones on my 2010 ram have never been rotated and all look evenly worn,but it only has 39,000 miles on it. Sounds like the continental's will not wear as well!Without saying what I think about Mr. Kilmer and the ideas he puts out there I can say that rotating tires is a must if you want to replace all four at the same time, with the same amount of wear.
This is especially true with a front-wheel drive based vehicle that always wears down the front tires faster than the rears because they handle steering, braking and power traction. The rears are just rolling along.
I rotated my original Continentals on the Maverick at about 15k miles when I saw a significant deal more wear on the fronts. By the time I replaced them all at 30k miles, they were all evenly spent.
Scotty's hands and body are all over the place when he talks... like watching Joe Cocker sing about auto repair...A Corvette and many other musclecars/sportscars comes with different spec front and rear tires. And then if those tires are directional, they can't even be rotated left to right without dismounting and remounting all four tires.
You caught me in a slight exaggeration, but in reality, you still don't rotate them.
____
Also, Scotty Kilmer is a hack, and any time you see any reference to him or god forbid a link to his YT channel, the only acceptable response isand then keep scrolling.
"Requires' might be harsh, perhaps 'benefit' is a better word.What vehicle requires 4 unique tires?
.
Your RAM was not a FWD based vehicle.The original factory firestones on my 2010 ram have never been rotated and all look evenly worn,but it only has 39,000 miles on it. Sounds like the continental's will not wear as well!
Agreed,but by that logic the rears should wear quicker? The weight of the engine is still on the front tires.Your RAM was not a FWD based vehicle.
No. As I explained.......and is common knowledge since the 1970s......FWD vehicles wear the front tires faster......because....... 1)steering, 2)braking and 3)power application - all three are being put to the front tires. The rear tires are along for the ride just like if they were on a trailer. Therefore, the front tires always wear at a faster rate than RWD vehicles which spread the loads around more evenly.Agreed,but by that logic the rears should wear quicker? The weight of the engine is still on the front tires.
i don't rotate the tires. i just buy two front ones when needed because the back tires look great when its time to buy the two front tires. the back aren't pivoting like the frontsI don't care what his podcast says. If you don't rotate tires you WILL have uneven wear. That isn't even debatable. On some cars you will end up replacing a pair significantly sooner without rotation. Many newer cars, especially in the luxury market use a fairly soft tire. Rotation is a cheap way to ensure getting more miles out of the tires. I would be curious what his logic is, but he is wrong either way.
Yeah that's exactly the reason the rest of us rotate tires.......i don't rotate the tires. i just buy two front ones when needed because the back tires look great when its time to buy the two front tires. the back aren't pivoting like the fronts