Ranger definitely gets around 19-20 combined mpg with the 2.3 and about 1 mpg less with the 2.7, and while that's vastly different than the 12 mpg reported, it's also not comparable to a Maverick hybrid or even ecoboost.
I would go Ranger 2.7 in a heartbeat if you're regularly towing 3500+. Plus, if you have a trailer that heavy, you'll probably be over the GVWR with passengers in the Mav and anything in the bed.
I would go Ranger 2.7 in a heartbeat if you're regularly towing 3500+. Plus, if you have a trailer that heavy, you'll probably be over the GVWR with passengers in the Mav and anything in the bed.
Sponsored