- First Name
- John
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2025
- Threads
- 15
- Messages
- 291
- Reaction score
- 295
- Location
- Henderson, KY
- Vehicle(s)
- Maverick XL
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
- Banned
- #61
100% agree, I would think about an EREV but absolutely never a BEV for Field Service interstate hauling -- maybe interstate passenger & light load hauling but every BEV truck so far has been a shit-show when attempting to use for truck stuff hauling a load over anything past commutting & god help you if hauling offroad.
Traction battery size/weight/cost/range rapidly becomes a doubling of the 1st 3 to eke a tiny incremental extra of the 4th, as the heavier vehicle uses more battery just to haul its empty weight & wear out tires & brakes as if its hauling a load when empty.
Not to mention longer & longer charging times, there is a safe traction voltage 500VAC is about the voltage that can be made somwhat safe for consumers handling a supercharger. At that voltage unless you increase the size of the heavy copper & cable diameters, those supercharging times are minimum length.
600VAC & higher you are getting significantly higher chances of Arc Flash & the Arc Flash turning into an explosive Arc Blast, its not if, its when at above 600VAC you would need a 6 foot boundary from the connector and a robot handling the connector or youll cook a human to a crisp at 7000 F Arc flash.
So yeah, with trucks hauling a load for more range you either spend 1 hour charging or wear Class 4 Arc Flash armor while connecting & disconnecting the charger at a voltage level high enough for faster charging.
EV driving when commutting or hauling in town through traffic, range extender for longer distance or hauling in cold weather.
Gasoline & Diesel are much more energy-dense than lithium-phosphate & dont drop range in half when hauling a load & temperatures drop.
Then theres the huge weight reduction of EREV vs BEV for 400+ mile ranges , IMO we dont need every F-150 owner driving something weighing 3/4 tons tearing up roads & tires & national park trails to somehow be considered "environmentally responsible".
Traction battery size/weight/cost/range rapidly becomes a doubling of the 1st 3 to eke a tiny incremental extra of the 4th, as the heavier vehicle uses more battery just to haul its empty weight & wear out tires & brakes as if its hauling a load when empty.
Not to mention longer & longer charging times, there is a safe traction voltage 500VAC is about the voltage that can be made somwhat safe for consumers handling a supercharger. At that voltage unless you increase the size of the heavy copper & cable diameters, those supercharging times are minimum length.
600VAC & higher you are getting significantly higher chances of Arc Flash & the Arc Flash turning into an explosive Arc Blast, its not if, its when at above 600VAC you would need a 6 foot boundary from the connector and a robot handling the connector or youll cook a human to a crisp at 7000 F Arc flash.
So yeah, with trucks hauling a load for more range you either spend 1 hour charging or wear Class 4 Arc Flash armor while connecting & disconnecting the charger at a voltage level high enough for faster charging.
EV driving when commutting or hauling in town through traffic, range extender for longer distance or hauling in cold weather.
Gasoline & Diesel are much more energy-dense than lithium-phosphate & dont drop range in half when hauling a load & temperatures drop.
Then theres the huge weight reduction of EREV vs BEV for 400+ mile ranges , IMO we dont need every F-150 owner driving something weighing 3/4 tons tearing up roads & tires & national park trails to somehow be considered "environmentally responsible".
The EREV approach is the correct one for a truck. I believe it will be more popular than the BEV Lightning.
Sponsored