Sponsored

2024 Maverick Backup Cam Recall

PlantMan

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jan 3, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
410
Reaction score
564
Location
Berwyn Heights, Maryland
Vehicle(s)
2017 F-250 4WD crew 8' bed; 2022 Maverick XL AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Somewhere buried back in the archives when I've been unable to find it was a post in late 2021 or early 2022 identifying the source of the non-sync Infotainment system and it was just a relabeled part that Ford apparently had in inventory that was used on a previous model car (2017 and earlier Focus or Fiesta? maybe) and manufactured somewhere in Europe. If that's the case, there's probably one embedded software engineer somewhere that can understand the code.

43 years as an embedded software engineer and I can appreciate how ugly embedded code can be, especially given cost, resource, and hardware constraints.

Edit: Here's one instance of the picture that I remember showing the Ford P/Ns. Then the top label was carefully removed to reveal the actual OEM label underneath.
https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/f...nable-to-upgrade-sync.7112/page-3#post-149831

I think this post pegs it as a 2018-2020 Fiesta unit that was repurposed for the Maverick.
https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/f...nable-to-upgrade-sync.7112/page-4#post-152143
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

Scott Asheville

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Scott
Joined
Oct 4, 2021
Threads
79
Messages
2,332
Reaction score
5,494
Location
Asheville, NC
Vehicle(s)
2022 AWD XLT ECO LUX CP360 HPR
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I have no sympathy for Ford.
They made the decision to cheap out on the infotainment system. Now after almost a 170 million dollar fine. With refreshed 2025 models arriving at dealers lots. Thousands of unsold 24 Maverick's sitting in storage lots on an indefinite sales hold until a fix can be found. Adding to the expense. All of the Mavericks that are being recalled that are currently sold and in owners hands, have to be FIXED. Maybe next time they'll say no to the Bean counter who told them it was more economical to do it the cheap way.
Sandy Munro's favorite phrase: "Don't save me money. I can't afford it.".
 

Scott Asheville

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Scott
Joined
Oct 4, 2021
Threads
79
Messages
2,332
Reaction score
5,494
Location
Asheville, NC
Vehicle(s)
2022 AWD XLT ECO LUX CP360 HPR
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Somewhere buried back in the archives when I've been unable to find it was a post in late 2021 or early 2022 identifying the source of the non-sync Infotainment system and it was just a relabeled part that Ford apparently had in inventory that was used on a previous model car (2017 and earlier Focus or Fiesta? maybe) and manufactured somewhere in Europe. If that's the case, there's probably one embedded software engineer somewhere that can understand the code.

43 years as an embedded software engineer and I can appreciate how ugly embedded code can be, especially given cost, resource, and hardware constraints.

Edit: Here's one instance of the picture that I remember showing the Ford P/Ns. Then the top label was carefully removed to reveal the actual OEM label underneath.
https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/f...nable-to-upgrade-sync.7112/page-3#post-149831

I think this post pegs it as a 2018-2020 Fiesta unit that was repurposed for the Maverick.
https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/f...nable-to-upgrade-sync.7112/page-4#post-152143
I was a high level software engineer in Delphi. Every now and then I had to open a DLL that was basically a hardware driver for this or that. It always made my eyes roll in panic. I have huge respect for the guys that do embedded or device drivers. Interrupts flying all over the place. Managing busses and limited memory and processors that can't get out of their own way. Threads out the wazoo. The only thing that scared me more was walking past the computer monitors of our assembly coders.

A boss at Honeywell once asked me if I could fix one gas monitor device dll. I spent a day puzzling over the code and asked him "how many years do I have to figure it out?".
 

23grayXLT84

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2023
Threads
18
Messages
668
Reaction score
976
Location
Midwest
Vehicle(s)
23 hybrid xlt
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Somewhere buried back in the archives when I've been unable to find it was a post in late 2021 or early 2022 identifying the source of the non-sync Infotainment system and it was just a relabeled part that Ford apparently had in inventory that was used on a previous model car (2017 and earlier Focus or Fiesta? maybe) and manufactured somewhere in Europe. If that's the case, there's probably one embedded software engineer somewhere that can understand the code.

43 years as an embedded software engineer and I can appreciate how ugly embedded code can be, especially given cost, resource, and hardware constraints.

Edit: Here's one instance of the picture that I remember showing the Ford P/Ns. Then the top label was carefully removed to reveal the actual OEM label underneath.
https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/f...nable-to-upgrade-sync.7112/page-3#post-149831

I think this post pegs it as a 2018-2020 Fiesta unit that was repurposed for the Maverick.
https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/f...nable-to-upgrade-sync.7112/page-4#post-152143
Good for Ford trying to repurpose old crap. maverick (including the 25s) is largely a parts bin vehicle. Now for them to have 200k+ leftover units is unlikely....right ?

This one will be costly for them.

Great find btw.
 

HeyBales

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
May 3, 2024
Threads
4
Messages
4,947
Reaction score
4,549
Location
KC Metro area
Vehicle(s)
2005 Toyota RAV4, 2024 XLT Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Your numbers aren't part numbers, but rather software numbers.
I assume that more changes than simply adding APIM would be needed for it to work, but I am not a technician!

The APIM would be something in addition to the ACM.

The ACM in 22-24 non-SYNC 3 Mavericks is:
MX7Z-18806-A

For 22-24 SYNC 3 Mavericks:
ACM is M1PZ-18K810-B
APIM is LU5Z-14G371-DJ

****Note, these modules are not ordered directly from Ford..... It may be possible that updated part numbers would show up when ordering. I'm just going by what Ford's Ecat is currently showing!!****


For all 25 Mavericks,
There are 5 ACMs: S1PZ-18806-A, -B, -C, -D, -E. (depending on radio type)
APIM is SZ6Z-14G371-BMA or SZ6Z-14G371-CYA (w/ connected navigation).
Finally found what PACM is - Pedestrian Alert Control Module.
Pulling teeth trying to find what that was.

So not another name for the ACM.
Though - certainly a module that I could see talking to an ACM which uses the video camera.
Oh well, was just seeing if this one scan tool report gave me a software version for the correct module. Nope.
 

Sponsored

billbillw

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Sep 15, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
759
Reaction score
810
Location
Metro Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
'23 Maverick Lariat FX4
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
This could take years like the VW Dieselgate fix. If that happens, eventually, all the 'stop sale' 2024 Mavericks will be sent to some huge lot where they will all get sun-faded before they are eventually sold at auction to shady used car dealers.

I kid, but given the issues of cheap hardware and the number of vehicles affected, anything is possible.

BTW, my Lariat is non-Lux so I'm affected by this as well as many other Lariat non-lux owners from MY22-23.
 

24atlasmaverick

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Christopher
Joined
Jun 30, 2023
Threads
11
Messages
271
Reaction score
167
Location
Buffalo, NY
Vehicle(s)
2024 maverick XLT, Lux, FX4, AWD, 4K
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Having the 2025s being delivered and the 2024s have to sit on the lot, you would think Ford is gonna come up with a solution fast. A lot of dealers are getting hosed on cars they can't move. I'm hoping we get a sync upgrade out of this and the crappy sync apim they put in here is the issue.
That’s the problem. XL/XLT has no apim like traditional ford vehicles. This does everything out of the ACM instead of the lariats which have an apim and acm.
 

Glen Baker LLC

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
May 29, 2024
Threads
30
Messages
7,371
Reaction score
12,447
Location
Central Nevada & Utah
Vehicle(s)
Maverick XLT Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I had a dealer tell me at the end of last week that they expect 2 more months
🤔
Thank God Ford's Software Team didn't work at NASA for Apollo 13. Otherwise our guys would have ended up like this.....

Ford Maverick 2024 Maverick Backup Cam Recall 20250115_105914
 

Potentilla

2.0L EcoBoost
Member
First Name
Andrew
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
19
Reaction score
13
Location
CT
Vehicle(s)
-
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost

YooperCracker

2.5L Hybrid
Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2025
Threads
3
Messages
17
Reaction score
16
Location
Northwest Arkansas
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ford Maverick Hybrid XL, 2011 Ford Ranger XL
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I did buy a 2024 Maverick Hybrid XL a couple of weeks ago. I was able to test drive it, but not take it home.

The reason I bought a non-drivable vehicle was (1) the Maverick was $1.8K under MSRP - pretty good for a hybrid these days (2) my trade-in was losing value every month (3) this dealer gave me the best trade-in value and (4) my trade-in was worth more than the Maverick so I didn't have to pay any sales tax.

I could have avoided sales tax by selling my trade-in and later buying a Maverick, but it would involve extra forms that I would have to obtain and fill out and I'm kind of lazy.

Plus I still enjoy driving my manual Ranger in the meantime - it's more fun to drive a slow car fast than a fast car slow - and while lazy, I am patient
 
Sponsored

Prickly Pear

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
John
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Threads
12
Messages
637
Reaction score
1,192
Location
Pacific Northwest
Vehicle(s)
24 Maverick XLT CG, 92 Ranger
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
It's funny they let you test drive it but not take it home - the "official" word is "DO NOT DEMONSTRATE OR DELIVER". I was able to take mine home as the sales folks were waiting till management came out and "red taped" all the Mav's.
 

CBennett

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Threads
9
Messages
146
Reaction score
104
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2023 Ford Maverick XLT Alto Blue w BO package
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Well fast forward to Jan 2026 and they said its a program/software download they didnt say anything about parts and they had mine for 2 full days and couldnt get the "program to work/take" so even after this they couldnt fix it..To me thats fine as I never showed any ill effects from it id never know it was broke really.
 

CBennett

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Threads
9
Messages
146
Reaction score
104
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2023 Ford Maverick XLT Alto Blue w BO package
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
So this is my whole thing as of 1/12/26 And they cant fix it apparently.
Well I dont know anything other than its 2026 now. I just had mine in 2 separate times for the backup camera "fix". They tried several attempts(apparently they need to download some kind of update/program.. they had it 2X for full days and somehow it "didnt take" work... They yesterday(1/12/26) called said it hadnt worked yet and wanted to know if I needed it back they could "try" tomorrow(today the 1/13/26) again.. I said you already tried multiple times over a 48 hour span got nothing so just let me have it back.

now I will say it never really gave me any/much issue. Im also astonished they cant fix it also.. its not like they didnt have it 2 FULL DAYS tried this "fix"(downloaded program) multiple times and it "didnt work/take".. I just now consider it a nothing,, they asked if id like to reschedule I said no you had your shots multiple times and cant fix it(again I never knew it was broken I still dont know what supposedly makes this a recall or how its "not working right" mine seems fine... but astonished they can "fix it" over a 2 day all day span.

First time I got oil change tires rotated and did the transmission service(that several here recommended) and they tried they had it all day yesterday they picked t up with their driver(i refused to bring it again and "wait a undisclosed time" to get it back(glad I didnt as it was ALL DAY!!) they fixed the small square USB port that they ordered parts for and tried several more installs of the fix and NOTHING.. absolutely amazing.
 

Jalopy Technology

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Rick
Joined
Oct 19, 2024
Threads
32
Messages
325
Reaction score
545
Location
Central Wisconsin
Vehicle(s)
'25 Maverick, '04 LeSabre, '99 Grand Cherokee, '88 F350 crew cab, '65 Dodge Coro
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
So this is my whole thing as of 1/12/26 And they cant fix it apparently.
Well I dont know anything other than its 2026 now. I just had mine in 2 separate times for the backup camera "fix". They tried several attempts(apparently they need to download some kind of update/program.. they had it 2X for full days and somehow it "didnt take" work... They yesterday(1/12/26) called said it hadnt worked yet and wanted to know if I needed it back they could "try" tomorrow(today the 1/13/26) again.. I said you already tried multiple times over a 48 hour span got nothing so just let me have it back.

now I will say it never really gave me any/much issue. Im also astonished they cant fix it also.. its not like they didnt have it 2 FULL DAYS tried this "fix"(downloaded program) multiple times and it "didnt work/take".. I just now consider it a nothing,, they asked if id like to reschedule I said no you had your shots multiple times and cant fix it(again I never knew it was broken I still dont know what supposedly makes this a recall or how its "not working right" mine seems fine... but astonished they can "fix it" over a 2 day all day span.

First time I got oil change tires rotated and did the transmission service(that several here recommended) and they tried they had it all day yesterday they picked t up with their driver(i refused to bring it again and "wait a undisclosed time" to get it back(glad I didnt as it was ALL DAY!!) they fixed the small square USB port that they ordered parts for and tried several more installs of the fix and NOTHING.. absolutely amazing.
Typical with these hi tech toys we are forced to buy.

For the last 20 years I saw my chripropracter when my “ back up camera” wasn’t working right… usually fixed in five sessions!
 

HeyBales

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
May 3, 2024
Threads
4
Messages
4,947
Reaction score
4,549
Location
KC Metro area
Vehicle(s)
2005 Toyota RAV4, 2024 XLT Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
So this is my whole thing as of 1/12/26 And they cant fix it apparently.
Well I dont know anything other than its 2026 now. I just had mine in 2 separate times for the backup camera "fix". They tried several attempts(apparently they need to download some kind of update/program.. they had it 2X for full days and somehow it "didnt take" work... They yesterday(1/12/26) called said it hadnt worked yet and wanted to know if I needed it back they could "try" tomorrow(today the 1/13/26) again.. I said you already tried multiple times over a 48 hour span got nothing so just let me have it back.

now I will say it never really gave me any/much issue. Im also astonished they cant fix it also.. its not like they didnt have it 2 FULL DAYS tried this "fix"(downloaded program) multiple times and it "didnt work/take".. I just now consider it a nothing,, they asked if id like to reschedule I said no you had your shots multiple times and cant fix it(again I never knew it was broken I still dont know what supposedly makes this a recall or how its "not working right" mine seems fine... but astonished they can "fix it" over a 2 day all day span.

First time I got oil change tires rotated and did the transmission service(that several here recommended) and they tried they had it all day yesterday they picked t up with their driver(i refused to bring it again and "wait a undisclosed time" to get it back(glad I didnt as it was ALL DAY!!) they fixed the small square USB port that they ordered parts for and tried several more installs of the fix and NOTHING.. absolutely amazing.
I'd bet the low level beginner tech normally put on these simple jobs was given multiple attempts to try - and failed.
And now they need to hand it off to a higher paid tech, but because they are only going to be paid so much for this recall - and already wasted that money on the time for the beginner tech, they need to wait until the senior tech truly has time and not cutting into his income.
Sponsored

 
 







Top