I’m a little conflicted on the seats as this is the first time we’ve seen them. I’ve gone back and forth between “love em” and “will deal” for the past hour and have landed on “love em”.
i dig the spice
i dig the spice
Sponsored
Im of the exact same mind in regards to the interior. I hope it looks like the review video.I really like my 2022 xlt interior, and my friends and family do too. I hope they keep the interior as shown on the video.
I bought a used 2004 ranger edge with black interior , blackout gauges, and vinyl floors. I never thought much about it , except it doesn't look dirty. It does show dog hair terrible, and I like German shepherd's. Dog hair goes everywhere I go, with or without my dog in tow.
I wasn't enthused about the all black interior when I ordered, but the overall package is a good deal. When I started hearing lower mpg, it was two strikes, but still a good deal.
I have been hoping for the normal xlt interior with tremor accents.
I am learning about off road. There are not many places to drive off road here , that are not private property. Most of the awd tech is over my head. For me it's mostly about snow, and Iowa gravel roads. They can get pretty sloppy and rutted. A wet spring or fall when the farmers are moving big equipment really tears them up. Even with the tremor there are level B roads I won't go on. Not unless it's dry, or I have someone to pull me out.
Given the rear diff has an 11-14-22 marking that's probably right off the regular production line.Could very well be a pre production review unit
Cuz nobody would watch a ranger comparisonWhy is this even a thing? Maverick is NOT in same class as Toyota! Why not do Ranger Raptor vs Toyota TRD Pro! Video posted is apples vs oranges. Just saying.
More like Toyota wouldnt allow it. Cant let the Taco get eaten.Cuz nobody would watch a ranger comparison
No, it’s not.Someone help me out, isn't the Ranger in the same "class" of truck as the Tacoma? Maverick is a class of its own. This review is pointless.
On the first page this was discussed.Someone help me out, isn't the Ranger in the same "class" of truck as the Tacoma? Maverick is a class of its own. This review is pointless.
Well, they could even it out. Make the Taco cost $15k less, give it twice the gas mileage, a better ride and more payload. Just for perspective.I hate those YouTube so called “influencers” that don’t do diligent research in the class of vehicles each belong in. Comparing the Maverick to the Tundra is like comparing apples to oranges. They’re not in the same class of vehicles. The Tundra is in the same class as the Ranger, Chevy Colorado, and Nissan Frontier. Those would be a fair comparison, but not the Maverick vs Tundra. And I’d still take the Maverick over the Tundra any day!!
The irony of this post is hilarious. Do some research the Tundra is a full size F-150 competitor. The Tacoma is the Ranger competitor.I hate those YouTube so called “influencers” that don’t do diligent research in the class of vehicles each belong in. Comparing the Maverick to the Tundra is like comparing apples to oranges. They’re not in the same class of vehicles. The Tundra is in the same class as the Ranger, Chevy Colorado, and Nissan Frontier. Those would be a fair comparison, but not the Maverick vs Tundra. And I’d still take the Maverick over the Tundra any day!!
Do you seriously think they don’t know the size competitors or do you think this was a video to show just how close a lower priced mav could get to a fully equipped mid size off road truck? The tundra is also not in the same class as any of the vehicles you listed.I hate those YouTube so called “influencers” that don’t do diligent research in the class of vehicles each belong in. Comparing the Maverick to the Tundra is like comparing apples to oranges. They’re not in the same class of vehicles. The Tundra is in the same class as the Ranger, Chevy Colorado, and Nissan Frontier. Those would be a fair comparison, but not the Maverick vs Tundra. And I’d still take the Maverick over the Tundra any day!!