6/4/23 UPDATEWildly off-topic in this thread.
Trying to get it back on track... I saw the OP said on Facebook that he got a complete Corsair 2.3 engine, not just the turbo.
The 2.3 (complete engine) has been installed
Sponsored
6/4/23 UPDATEWildly off-topic in this thread.
Trying to get it back on track... I saw the OP said on Facebook that he got a complete Corsair 2.3 engine, not just the turbo.
Not bad for winging it6/4/23 UPDATE
The 2.3 (complete engine) has been installed![]()
6/4/23 UPDATE
The 2.3 (complete engine) has been installed![]()
Not bad for winging it![]()
Isn’t it!?!That's awesome!
At the very least if they ever release an ST or RS Maverick I won’t want one because it will probably be slower lol. Unless they somehow stuff a twin turbo 6 cylinder in it. My brother has an Explorer ST and an intercooler upgrade with drop in filter and time gets you mid to high 12s.. My buddy has a 3.5 F150 and same 3 upgrades got him mid 7s in the 8th.
Just want to be sure I’m understanding. Are you planning to install a V6 Twin turbo into a Maverick?I can tell you, I have the Ford Explorer ST and I'm looking at wrecked mavericks right now to do that very thing.
Our Explorer St is doing 11.79 in the quarter with literally just a tune!!! It's nuts.
Just want to be sure I’m understanding. Are you planning to install a V6 Twin turbo into a Maverick?
I believe Lawrence has on his. I don’t think anyone else has because I have since been working with Comp turbo and they are 57/75. At least 10 people have purchased one and a handful are running them. I also offer the 50/67 which is based off the stock 2.0 turbo. That has made 349 whp with just an S&B, Intercooler and downpipe.Has anyone actually put one of the 57/71 turbos on a 2.0 yet?