Sponsored

Effect on full EV Maverick possibilities..........??

BradnChristine

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Brad
Joined
Nov 3, 2021
Threads
43
Messages
2,463
Reaction score
3,077
Location
Wyoming
Vehicle(s)
'23 Maverick Lariat Hybrid (towed); '25 Ranger Lariat; '15 C-Max; '20 Transit RV
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
... Anything else we would like to passionately argue about which only exists in the minds of the few? 🤣
Frankly, I'd rather see more posts asking about what the card slot is behind the mode buttons... than argue about a non-existent EV Maverick and how all the big city folks think they are the cat's meow.
Sponsored

 

Montana

2.0L EcoBoost
Banned
Banned
Joined
Jun 13, 2023
Threads
24
Messages
4,094
Reaction score
6,347
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
.
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Feel free to respond to my post not the one in your head. I said if you regularly drive 600 miles at a clip and want to refuel like a LeMans race an EV isn't for you. Every case is different, however most people don't drive long distances and refuel on the road more than a few times a year .
Gas mileage has improved 10 fold? Doesn't seem to be the case according to CAFE. So there were plenty of cars getting 20 MPG now there are plenty getting 200 mpg.? I drive a GMC at work and I get around 9 mpg.
So I said if you have to charge at public stations mostly you won't save money on an EV. Yes the electrical grid can never be improved, it's 1950 forever!
If solar panels are such a ripoff why are do many homeowners installing them?
Most people have two cars , one can be you road tripper . But yes since a few people live in the sticks and drive 5,000 miles a week and an EV is no good for them it's no good for anyone. Cheers
The electrical grid is EXTREMELY stable where I live the last power outage I had that lasted more than a couple of hours was superstorm Sandy in 2012. That was 12 years ago by my rudimentary math
Gas stations don't work when the powers out either. If you know the storm is coming you fiil your tank ( waiting in a loooong line- looking at you Florida) if you have an EV you charge it at home with no line. Plus if you have solar and the power is out for 8 weeks - as often happens....- you can charge from the roof.
If everyone thought like you FDR would have never electrified the countryside, no profit in it.
This all just tells me how little you understand about the world, our infrastructure, my post, and how complacent you are. I never said solar panels are a rip off btw. Pay attention. You are all over the place with this ADHD like rant.

Go touch grass.
 

Snox801

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Levi
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Threads
39
Messages
1,742
Reaction score
2,035
Location
Spring Lake Michigan
Vehicle(s)
23 F150-2016 RS/ 22 GT500/ rx8 x2/ 95 mustang GT/ 17 edge.
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
This conversation needs to be put into context.

Just because Ford and GM are struggling with BEVs doesn't mean all OEMs are. Hyundai just announced they wished they could make more BEVs, because they can't build them fast enough to meet customer demand. Tesla profitably sold 1.8 million BEVs in 2023 and continues to scale at 50% per year (with some price incentives, but still at industry leading profit margins). Mercedes is loving their BEV sales. Volvo too.

Just saying you cannot extrapolate the failure of the Detroit Three to a whole industry. Ford has executed so poorly in the sedan space that it's pretty much thrown up its hands in despair and given up on making actual cars not named Mustang. And the Detroit Three only own the truck market because we have a protectionist 25% tariff on imported trucks.

Will we see a BEV Maverick from Ford? Who really cares - we'll see a BEV small truck (or two or three) from somebody else, when the time is right.

Should your government be subsidizing BEVs? Depends on whether or not you want an automobile industry in the USA, because the Chinese are looking at the inept Detroit Big Three and salivating.
Well if we look at context, I’m not sure any of those companies make any money on ev except Tesla. Tesla is an odd o e because it’s a lifestyle brand not just cars. Government shouldn’t be helping any company. It leads to more and more tax dollars. Government gives billions, ford bend over for the union and gave them massive contracts. Why they know they are to big to fail, so we the taxpayers are again bailing out bad ideas being forced. Organic growth of any industry is best.
If one wants an example look at airplanes. Government spent huge amounts of money and hired the best people. Then failed lost all the money and put out a statement saying it can’t be done. Not long after that two brother that used private money made it happen. Leading to a massive industry with tons of money. No need for the taxpayer to help and government mandates. Better ideas and products always win out.
Make a better product that makes life better for people and people willing give you money for that product.
 

Gonzo chris

Banned
Banned
First Name
Chris
Joined
Feb 27, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
635
Location
Bucks county PA
Vehicle(s)
Infiniti g35 coupe, VW Golf
Engine
Undecided
This all just tells me how little you understand about the world, our infrastructure, my post, and how complacent you are. I never said solar panels are a rip off btw. Pay attention. You are all over the place with this ADHD like rant.

Go touch grass.
Oh you're one of them. You're assuming that because I'm not an old man yelling at a cloud that I live Manhattan or in a city and I need to go touch him grass like real Americans...lol. I'm in the suburbs. I just cut my grass yesterday. You're arguing that EVs don't work for someone who lives in Montana on top of a mountain, 7 hours away from a hospital. And I agree with you. They're not the best choice there. You're arguing that they're okay for people who live in cities and the suburbs, which is where 95% of people live. So yes, I don't buy equipment for milking cows because I don't own cows. I'm sorry if it's a rant to you and you can't keep up, but there's a lot to dig into when you're talking a lot of nonsense.
Explain the world to me and infrastructure, I actually work in infrastructure by the way. If you were alive in the 1920s you would have said there's no way Appalachia will have electricity. It can't be done. If you were alive in the 1800s you would have said man would never fly. I understand as people get older their world shrinks and they tend to become more negative. I'm 55 by the way, but I try to keep an open mind and learn new things. Solar panels are not that expensive, especially with current rebates And tax credits. It's more worth it if you're going to stay in your house a long time, but it's not that expensive. I know people that spend $90,000 on a truck that's a depreciating asset.....
 

Gonzo chris

Banned
Banned
First Name
Chris
Joined
Feb 27, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
635
Location
Bucks county PA
Vehicle(s)
Infiniti g35 coupe, VW Golf
Engine
Undecided
This all just tells me how little you understand about the world, our infrastructure, my post, and how complacent you are. I never said solar panels are a rip off btw. Pay attention. You are all over the place with this ADHD like rant.

Go touch grass.
Do me a favor and explain to me the real world from you know a real American and explain to me how infrastructure works. And explain to me how it seems the rest of the world can do it. But America is full of a bunch of old farts who think we can't do anything anymore. It's really sad
 

Sponsored

Gonzo chris

Banned
Banned
First Name
Chris
Joined
Feb 27, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
635
Location
Bucks county PA
Vehicle(s)
Infiniti g35 coupe, VW Golf
Engine
Undecided
Frankly, I'd rather see more posts asking about what the card slot is behind the mode buttons... than argue about a non-existent EV Maverick and how all the big city folks think they are the cat's meow.
Yeah them there big city folks. They ain't real 'murricans like us out here in the country. Yep yep you know some of them people think one day we're going to have big flat screen color TVs and all that silly nonsense. And you'll be able to hold a phone in your hand and use things like GPS, whatever that is.......lol. FWIW EVs are much better in the suburbs than the city as many people in the city don't have a place to charge at home. Most people in the suburbs have a driveway or a garage where they can plug it in at night and unplug it in the morning
 
Last edited:

Gonzo chris

Banned
Banned
First Name
Chris
Joined
Feb 27, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
635
Location
Bucks county PA
Vehicle(s)
Infiniti g35 coupe, VW Golf
Engine
Undecided
Well if we look at context, I’m not sure any of those companies make any money on ev except Tesla. Tesla is an odd o e because it’s a lifestyle brand not just cars. Government shouldn’t be helping any company. It leads to more and more tax dollars. Government gives billions, ford bend over for the union and gave them massive contracts. Why they know they are to big to fail, so we the taxpayers are again bailing out bad ideas being forced. Organic growth of any industry is best.
If one wants an example look at airplanes. Government spent huge amounts of money and hired the best people. Then failed lost all the money and put out a statement saying it can’t be done. Not long after that two brother that used private money made it happen. Leading to a massive industry with tons of money. No need for the taxpayer to help and government mandates. Better ideas and products always win out.
Make a better product that makes life better for people and people willing give you money for that product.
The Wright brothers didn't get us to the moon though the government did. Would have been pretty difficult for a private company and a couple of Brothers on a beach to come up with that kind of cash. Same with nuclear weapons, the military that ended world war II in our favor, etc. taxpayers help the airline industry all the time, they build airports, they build the infrastructure for the planes to get their materials, air traffic control, regulations, etc.
. If the world was simpler and countries like China weren't helping their businesses. I might agree with you a bit more there, but that's not the world we live in now. You're going to be bailing Ford out again, unless we let them go under or get bought, not because the unions make more than someone at 7-Eleven but because their products are going to be uncompetitive. They're pulling out a worldwide markets like Europe, China, basically failing there. They're going to be limited to a North American company only and then when the cheaper imports come in they'll be gone. The big 3 we're at their peak when they were almost entirely Union and today labor is a small cost in making a vehicle

Ford Maverick Effect on full EV Maverick possibilities..........?? imag


Ford Maverick Effect on full EV Maverick possibilities..........?? IMG_20240420_080958
 
Last edited:

Snox801

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Levi
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Threads
39
Messages
1,742
Reaction score
2,035
Location
Spring Lake Michigan
Vehicle(s)
23 F150-2016 RS/ 22 GT500/ rx8 x2/ 95 mustang GT/ 17 edge.
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
The Wright brothers didn't get us to the moon though the government did. Would have been pretty difficult for a private company and a couple of Brothers on a beach to come up with that kind of cash. Same with nuclear weapons, the military that ended world war II in our favor, etc. If the world was simpler and countries like China weren't helping their businesses. I might agree with you a bit more there, but that's not the world we live in now. You're going to be bailing Ford out again, unless we let them go under or get bought, not because the unions make more than someone at 7-Eleven but because their products are going to be uncompetitive. They're pulling out a worldwide markets like Europe, China, basically failing there. They're going to be limited to a North American company only and then when the cheaper imports come in they'll be gone. The big 3 we're at their peak when they were almost entirely Union and today labor is a small cost in making a vehicle

image.jpg


IMG_20240420_080958.jpg
That’s pretty revisionist history. Fact is flight was done without a huge budget. Government spent a fortune. That same government that got us to space couldn’t figure out ho to land a rocket. Musk did.
So the fact is it very well could have done all those private. If we had a good incentive
 

Snox801

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Levi
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Threads
39
Messages
1,742
Reaction score
2,035
Location
Spring Lake Michigan
Vehicle(s)
23 F150-2016 RS/ 22 GT500/ rx8 x2/ 95 mustang GT/ 17 edge.
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Not to mention. Again the conversation isn’t as much should we but how much money and economic power should we spend to do this in such a forced manner. The end of the world is not coming from one country and its cars. So if we took a slower more consumer based approach all would be good. Less government spending, and people who want them will get them while driving innovation for cleaner ice while at the same time better battery tech.
 

Gonzo chris

Banned
Banned
First Name
Chris
Joined
Feb 27, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
635
Location
Bucks county PA
Vehicle(s)
Infiniti g35 coupe, VW Golf
Engine
Undecided
That’s pretty revisionist history. Fact is flight was done without a huge budget. Government spent a fortune. That same government that got us to space couldn’t figure out ho to land a rocket. Musk did.
So the fact is it very well could have done all those private. If we had a good incentive
You're being intellectually inconsistent. You're against companies being helped by the government, but SpaceX has been helped massively by the government. Not Musk either. He has teams of engineers. He is not an engineer. Tesla is also largely irrelevant as the Koreans, the Chinese and the Germans are more likely to last than Tesla. It's not. Revision is history. NASA is a government institution and they are the ones who got us on the moon. The original rocket design was done by the German government in world war II, the V2 rocket. Certain things take a certain amount of capital and risk that a company that is for-profit will never take. SpaceX would not be in business if the government wasn't funding them. Businessman like more of a sure thing in an investment. The government, theoretically, is working for all of our greater good as citizens and therefore are willing to spend money on things that are a loss like running electricity out into the middle of the woods for poor country folk who never would have electricity to this day because the electric companies would take 300 years to make the money back from running all the poles, transformers etc to one house. So it's a case of render unto Caesar what is his etc
 
Sponsored

Gonzo chris

Banned
Banned
First Name
Chris
Joined
Feb 27, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
635
Location
Bucks county PA
Vehicle(s)
Infiniti g35 coupe, VW Golf
Engine
Undecided
Not to mention. Again the conversation isn’t as much should we but how much money and economic power should we spend to do this in such a forced manner. The end of the world is not coming from one country and its cars. So if we took a slower more consumer based approach all
Not to mention. Again the conversation isn’t as much should we but how much money and economic power should we spend to do this in such a forced manner. The end of the world is not coming from one country and its cars. So if we took a slower more consumer based approach all would be good. Less government spending, and people who want them will get them while driving innovation for cleaner ice while at the same time better battery tech.
would be good. Less government spending, and people who want them will get them while driving innovation for cleaner ice while at the same time better battery tech.
The government forces us to do or not do things. That's what a government is. You're just used to some of it. You're not allowed to drink and drive because you might hurt others, the theory here whether you agree with it or not is that burning fuels is bad for the environment. You're being forced to have environmental controls on your car. It's just an extenuation of that with a different tech. The government doesn't allow you to drive 100 mph down a residential Street or walk naked down that street even though you're not hurting anybody, but people would be offended... The government doesn't let you do whatever you want with the property you own. I paid my house off and I don't have a mortgage but I can't turn it into a bar. Local code would prevent it. I can't make it into a nuclear waste dump because the government has decided I would likely give my neighbors cancer and kill them. It's just it's something new so it's it's bothering you more. And it's also affecting something you like. You're not being forced anyway. If the tech isn't there, you'll still be able to buy a gas car 10 years from now. As for the people who say it will never happen, they're more likely using their limited Outlook and thinking it will never happen in their lifetime. Never is a long time. It might not happen in your lifetime but 300 years from now we're not going to be driving around in EcoBoost engines burning gas
 

Gonzo chris

Banned
Banned
First Name
Chris
Joined
Feb 27, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
635
Location
Bucks county PA
Vehicle(s)
Infiniti g35 coupe, VW Golf
Engine
Undecided
That’s pretty revisionist history. Fact is flight was done without a huge budget. Government spent a fortune. That same government that got us to space couldn’t figure out ho to land a rocket. Musk did.
So the fact is it very well could have done all those private. If we had a good incentive
Also, I'm glad you brought up SpaceX because that's more government involved and heavy-handed than this EV thing. The government is simply setting emission standards that gas cars can't meet. They're not building the car. They are not paying Ford to build an EV. People who voluntarily buy Fords are funding it. There is no United States government EV for sale like a NASA rocket, they're not paying Ford or GM to build the car. They're simply setting the standards and letting the market compete to try to meet that. SpaceX is funded by the government a lot more than any private car company. The government also has regulations and standards for SpaceX much like they do for cars.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-musks-spacex-tesla-far-170500028.html
 
Last edited:

710-oil-614

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Cal
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
6,056
Reaction score
11,888
Location
Ohio...but I'd rather be in Boone.
Vehicle(s)
2025 Hybrid AWD Lariat
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
LOL i almost don't want to touch this because everyone is heated but -

Well if we look at context, I’m not sure any of those companies make any money on ev except Tesla. Tesla is an odd o e because it’s a lifestyle brand not just cars.
Tesla makes money on their EVs because they challenged a lot of norms and practices in auto industry manufacturing. They were lucky that investors allowed them to burn hundreds of millions of dollars annually to streamline their manufacturing AND secure materials and supply chains to sustain increased production while reducing vehicles costs.

Tesla makes money on EVs today because Tesla builds them cheaper (manufacturing process, labor, and critical materials) than the average vehicle costs to produce. Their two best selling cars are currently priced less than the average price of a new vehicle.

Calling them a lifestyle brand means you haven't paid attention to their business model in the past decade.
 

Gonzo chris

Banned
Banned
First Name
Chris
Joined
Feb 27, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
635
Location
Bucks county PA
Vehicle(s)
Infiniti g35 coupe, VW Golf
Engine
Undecided
LOL i almost don't want to touch this because everyone is heated but -



Tesla makes money on their EVs because they challenged a lot of norms and practices in auto industry manufacturing. They were lucky that investors allowed them to burn hundreds of millions of dollars annually to streamline their manufacturing AND secure materials and supply chains to sustain increased production while reducing vehicles costs.

Tesla makes money on EVs today because Tesla builds them cheaper (manufacturing process, labor, and critical materials) than the average vehicle costs to produce. Their two best selling cars are currently priced less than the average price of a new vehicle.

Calling them a lifestyle brand means you haven't paid attention to their business model in the past decade.
I might be hijacking the thread because I enjoy the discussion, but just wanted to put it out there that I'm not heated. I'm having a good discussion with Snox even though I don't agree with him totally. I probably agree with him more than he realizes its a question of degree though. But when other people refer to me as a know-nothing City person who don't even know me that is a bit annoying but at the end of the day I don't care. I mean if somebody wants to make the argument that EVs are only good for people who live in the cities and the suburbs and then turn around and say they're not good for most people ,if they can square that circle cheers to them
 

BradnChristine

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Brad
Joined
Nov 3, 2021
Threads
43
Messages
2,463
Reaction score
3,077
Location
Wyoming
Vehicle(s)
'23 Maverick Lariat Hybrid (towed); '25 Ranger Lariat; '15 C-Max; '20 Transit RV
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
This all just tells me how little you understand about the world, our infrastructure, my post, and how complacent you are. I never said solar panels are a rip off btw. Pay attention. You are all over the place with this ADHD like rant.

Go touch grass.
Touch grass is kinder than "go pound sand."
Sponsored

 
 







Top