Sponsored

87 Octane?

bluesteel

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Jerry
Joined
Jan 15, 2023
Threads
10
Messages
199
Reaction score
188
Location
Bergland, MI (U.P.)
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Lariat
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Always 87, works great. I'll use higher octane towing in the mountains, though.
Sponsored

 

Shakesbear

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
J. R.
Joined
Jan 5, 2022
Threads
3
Messages
1,171
Reaction score
1,417
Location
Heart of the Texas Hill Country
Vehicle(s)
Lariat AWD, FX4, 4K, Lux, no CP360 assist
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Living in South Florida, we've experienced fuel supply disruption as a result of the record-breaking rainfall that affected Ft. Lauderdale a week and a half ago. As a result, certain stations are completely out of fuel or are only limited to the cheapest grade, 87 octane. After work, I decided to head to a fuel station since I was only on one bar and the fuel light popped on. I went to a Mobil about a mile down the road. The only grade they had was 87 octane so I bit the bullet and filled with it anyway. Ever since I got my Maverick, I've only put 89 octane which makes it run optimally. After putting 87 in for the first time however, the car was not happy about at all. It keeps sputtering, bucking, and seems sluggish on acceleration. Even the engine note sounds a little different, like it has a deeper tone. I told my dad about it and suggested getting octane booster at an auto parts store. I'll give it a try but I'm writing this because I'm questioning whether or not to ever use 87 octane again despite the vehicle being rated for it. I've read the Ecoboost engine is made to run on 87 but I'm sure it's only if you're not looking for optimal performance, fuel economy, or driving range. Premium is not required, however, but I'm definitely starting to see the positive affects it does have on an engine.

Does anyone else run 87 octane in their Mavericks, Ecoboost or Hybrid? If so, what are the results? Anyone else having performance issues with cheaper grade fuel?
Run 87 only, and have had no problems. I do use top tier fuel 😎
 

Driverdown13

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Joseph
Joined
May 12, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
62
Reaction score
116
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
Ford Maverick
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Living in South Florida, we've experienced fuel supply disruption as a result of the record-breaking rainfall that affected Ft. Lauderdale a week and a half ago. As a result, certain stations are completely out of fuel or are only limited to the cheapest grade, 87 octane. After work, I decided to head to a fuel station since I was only on one bar and the fuel light popped on. I went to a Mobil about a mile down the road. The only grade they had was 87 octane so I bit the bullet and filled with it anyway. Ever since I got my Maverick, I've only put 89 octane which makes it run optimally. After putting 87 in for the first time however, the car was not happy about at all. It keeps sputtering, bucking, and seems sluggish on acceleration. Even the engine note sounds a little different, like it has a deeper tone. I told my dad about it and suggested getting octane booster at an auto parts store. I'll give it a try but I'm writing this because I'm questioning whether or not to ever use 87 octane again despite the vehicle being rated for it. I've read the Ecoboost engine is made to run on 87 but I'm sure it's only if you're not looking for optimal performance, fuel economy, or driving range. Premium is not required, however, but I'm definitely starting to see the positive affects it does have on an engine.

Does anyone else run 87 octane in their Mavericks, Ecoboost or Hybrid? If so, what are the results? Anyone else having performance issues with cheaper grade fuel?
Yes you correct 87 is garbage fuel I’ve learned years ago when I used 87 octane and saw the affects of low octane fuel how sluggish the engine ran. So I experience the same poor performance you did I only use 89 octane mid grade unless I’m towing, driving in the mountains then it’s 91 octane.
You want to check the performance of each fuel grade this is what I do first fill the tank with 87 octane from full tank to empty then do the same with 89 full to empty then 91 full to empty when entering a freeway smash the gas peddler to the floor if the freeway is at 65+mph then take performance notes. You will see a difference. Love to hear an engine scream with tachometer up at 7500 what a feeling.
 

ShadowChas

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Chuck
Joined
Nov 13, 2021
Threads
6
Messages
652
Reaction score
792
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick XLT FX4
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Living in South Florida, we've experienced fuel supply disruption as a result of the record-breaking rainfall that affected Ft. Lauderdale a week and a half ago. As a result, certain stations are completely out of fuel or are only limited to the cheapest grade, 87 octane. After work, I decided to head to a fuel station since I was only on one bar and the fuel light popped on. I went to a Mobil about a mile down the road. The only grade they had was 87 octane so I bit the bullet and filled with it anyway. Ever since I got my Maverick, I've only put 89 octane which makes it run optimally. After putting 87 in for the first time however, the car was not happy about at all. It keeps sputtering, bucking, and seems sluggish on acceleration. Even the engine note sounds a little different, like it has a deeper tone. I told my dad about it and suggested getting octane booster at an auto parts store. I'll give it a try but I'm writing this because I'm questioning whether or not to ever use 87 octane again despite the vehicle being rated for it. I've read the Ecoboost engine is made to run on 87 but I'm sure it's only if you're not looking for optimal performance, fuel economy, or driving range. Premium is not required, however, but I'm definitely starting to see the positive affects it does have on an engine.

Does anyone else run 87 octane in their Mavericks, Ecoboost or Hybrid? If so, what are the results? Anyone else having performance issues with cheaper grade fuel?
w/over 45K miles I myself have always run 87 in my ecoboost (all my vehicles) without any problems whatsoever as I haven't found it not to be worth the extra cost, but as many already have stated I believe you got bad fuel. I know it's only my opinion (this is what the forum is for) but the manual says it's ok to run 87 unless you're using for towing and high temperatures, etc... to "optimize" your engine, but everything is run by the computer anyway.
 

pigsareus

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Oct 26, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
1,142
Reaction score
1,282
Location
Farmington Hills, Michigan
Vehicle(s)
Maverick XL Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I run 87 in my ecoboost. But I only get it from Costco, or if on a road trip, Chevron. I have experimented with premium and found it wasn't worth the $ difference. Slightly better MPG but I couldn't tell a difference in performance.
87 octane since I got my hybrid / zero issues. 5k miles
 

Sponsored

mustachemn

2.0L EcoBoost
Member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
20
Reaction score
23
Location
chesapeake va
Vehicle(s)
2003 Ranger 4x4, 03Mercury suv, 03 Escape
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I run 87 in my ecoboost. But I only get it from Costco, or if on a road trip, Chevron. I have experimented with premium and found it wasn't worth the $ difference. Slightly better MPG but I couldn't tell a difference in performance.
I've had my Maverick 9 months now. I run 87 octanes only. I'm getting 22-24 around town and 32-34 on the highway. No performance problems were noted and peppy as all get out.
 

Blkraven66

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Greg
Joined
Jan 10, 2022
Threads
27
Messages
186
Reaction score
138
Location
New Jersey
Vehicle(s)
Ford Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Living in South Florida, we've experienced fuel supply disruption as a result of the record-breaking rainfall that affected Ft. Lauderdale a week and a half ago. As a result, certain stations are completely out of fuel or are only limited to the cheapest grade, 87 octane. After work, I decided to head to a fuel station since I was only on one bar and the fuel light popped on. I went to a Mobil about a mile down the road. The only grade they had was 87 octane so I bit the bullet and filled with it anyway. Ever since I got my Maverick, I've only put 89 octane which makes it run optimally. After putting 87 in for the first time however, the car was not happy about at all. It keeps sputtering, bucking, and seems sluggish on acceleration. Even the engine note sounds a little different, like it has a deeper tone. I told my dad about it and suggested getting octane booster at an auto parts store. I'll give it a try but I'm writing this because I'm questioning whether or not to ever use 87 octane again despite the vehicle being rated for it. I've read the Ecoboost engine is made to run on 87 but I'm sure it's only if you're not looking for optimal performance, fuel economy, or driving range. Premium is not required, however, but I'm definitely starting to see the positive affects it does have on an engine.

Does anyone else run 87 octane in their Mavericks, Ecoboost or Hybrid? If so, what are the results? Anyone else having performance issues with cheaper grade fuel?
Always run 87 in my 2022 XL Ecoboost AWD. No issues at all. Getting anywhere from 30-32mpg in a 60/40 mix of highway/country road driving, 29000 miles on it now .
 

Nw_adventure

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 3, 2021
Threads
101
Messages
3,134
Reaction score
2,928
Location
Salt Lake city
Vehicle(s)
Honda Element/ Toyota Highlander
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I run 85, after doing some research, it seems like that should be fine. The hybrid recommends 87, but Utah doesn't offer that.
For the EB - Manual states 85 octane will void the warranty. Been using 91 from Costco - @ Elevation the truck seems to drive smoother/more power than 88.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bgn

Tim d

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Tim
Joined
May 18, 2022
Threads
19
Messages
1,689
Reaction score
1,756
Location
Alpena
Vehicle(s)
Ram
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Living in South Florida, we've experienced fuel supply disruption as a result of the record-breaking rainfall that affected Ft. Lauderdale a week and a half ago. As a result, certain stations are completely out of fuel or are only limited to the cheapest grade, 87 octane. After work, I decided to head to a fuel station since I was only on one bar and the fuel light popped on. I went to a Mobil about a mile down the road. The only grade they had was 87 octane so I bit the bullet and filled with it anyway. Ever since I got my Maverick, I've only put 89 octane which makes it run optimally. After putting 87 in for the first time however, the car was not happy about at all. It keeps sputtering, bucking, and seems sluggish on acceleration. Even the engine note sounds a little different, like it has a deeper tone. I told my dad about it and suggested getting octane booster at an auto parts store. I'll give it a try but I'm writing this because I'm questioning whether or not to ever use 87 octane again despite the vehicle being rated for it. I've read the Ecoboost engine is made to run on 87 but I'm sure it's only if you're not looking for optimal performance, fuel economy, or driving range. Premium is not required, however, but I'm definitely starting to see the positive affects it does have on an engine.

Does anyone else run 87 octane in their Mavericks, Ecoboost or Hybrid? If so, what are the results? Anyone else having performance issues with cheaper grade fuel?
Just did a Google search,it's says 89 is not needed.i plan on using 87 in my maverick .
 
Sponsored

Sleeper 7

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Steven
Joined
Sep 22, 2022
Threads
16
Messages
330
Reaction score
327
Location
NH
Vehicle(s)
18 Fusion 14 Ram Dump 23 Maverick XL
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I always run 87. Only use 93 if im going to New England dragway . I get better MPG with 87 and dont need the extra HP to run errands and commute with.
 

hurrah

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Feb 6, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
129
Reaction score
121
Location
Hartville, MO 65667
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger 2012 Ford F250 6.7 2015 Ford XL
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
w/over 45K miles I myself have always run 87 in my ecoboost (all my vehicles) without any problems whatsoever as I haven't found it not to be worth the extra cost, but as many already have stated I believe you got bad fuel. I know it's only my opinion (this is what the forum is for) but the manual says it's ok to run 87 unless you're using for towing and high temperatures, etc... to "optimize" your engine, but everything is run by the computer anyway.
I've had no problems on 87 but am wondering if long range there might be an advantage to using 92 as it has no ethanol whereas all 87 in MO has ethanol? My son has converted me to Amsoil but hasn't convinced me yet to switch to ethanol free gas.
 

baseballchamps

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Randy
Joined
Oct 29, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
149
Reaction score
160
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
2001 Ford Taurus SES
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I've had no problems on 87 but am wondering if long range there might be an advantage to using 92 as it has no ethanol whereas all 87 in MO has ethanol? My son has converted me to Amsoil but hasn't convinced me yet to switch to ethanol free gas.
Seems like whatever octane you break in with will work fine so why choose a higher one. I owned a Taurus for 21 years and never had an issue with 87 octane. So, I will continue with 87.
 

Mightybeast

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Adam
Joined
Dec 28, 2021
Threads
64
Messages
436
Reaction score
286
Location
Oklahoma
Vehicle(s)
Maverick hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
Always use 87. My average is 46 mpg based between fill ups. Altho it is goes to 47 when I use Shell gas station. With temperature going up pmg should increase as well.
Sponsored

 
 







Top