Sponsored

Mervin the Maverick

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Ken
Joined
Aug 31, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
407
Reaction score
256
Location
Sierra Vista, AZ
Vehicle(s)
2019 Kia Niro, 2019 Hyunda1 Kona, 2002 Chevy S10
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
It only adds about 200 pounds total in production so not very much weight. The 2025 Maverick hybrid awd powertrain is already being sold in for Europe vehicles and gets excellent fuel economy in the euro tests
Thanks! Maybe I should have done more research. I didn’t think about the other vehicles on this platform or drivetrain.
Sponsored

 

Mervin the Maverick

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Ken
Joined
Aug 31, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
407
Reaction score
256
Location
Sierra Vista, AZ
Vehicle(s)
2019 Kia Niro, 2019 Hyunda1 Kona, 2002 Chevy S10
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
https://one.nhtsa.gov/cafe_pic/home


I want a single cab truck that's smaller than the Maverick, but I also don't expect to get it on the Ford C2 platform, because I doubt it would make economic sense for Ford. Also CAFE rules dis-incentivize OEMs from making smaller trucks (typical government perverse incentives). So I don't think a smaller truck will be ICE (or even hybrid).

I do hope we'll see a BEV truck in the next few years that's smaller than the Maverick. Ford has hinted at one just yesterday. Toyota has hinted at one. Canoo has one in evaluation by the Army, but they might not even be in business next week. A company called "TELO Truck" has a mule, but I'm dubious they'll be in business tomorrow morning. Still, hope springs eternal.
I hate how personal trucks (pick ups) have grown out of their usefulness. Yes, there are truly folks who need to pull a stump out, pull a huge trailer, or carry pallets of ceramic floor tiles, but I do not need to do that, and I bet most buyers don’t either. I mean, who is going to spend $90K and then drive off road?
 

Taxman100

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Sep 18, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
190
Reaction score
250
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2023 XLT Lux Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
EPA requirements are based upon a formula using the wheelbase and track width. There is a reason the Maverick was made with as long of a wheelbase that it has.

In the modern auto industry, the first priority of any manufacturer is to satisfy the various regulatory agencies - what the customer wants comes second.
 

OneAlienBoi

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Kev
Joined
Jul 22, 2022
Threads
59
Messages
1,246
Reaction score
2,324
Location
Utah
Vehicle(s)
Explorer
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
No. But luckily, no, it's not hundreds of millions to develop a supercab or even 2 door maverick with a longer bed. 😂

I am not in the industry but if we're all tossing out wild guesses I would say more like 5 to 10 million. Bet there's a way to guess at that from Ford's sec 10k filings.
So I did some quick research, and while it's not perfect, I found a guy who spent his career overseeing the tooling for car company. It was his job to manage the expenses of manufacturing a new car. I'll include his quote below, but he said to do all the tooling, all the new metal presses and molds for an all new body, is around 600 million dollars. He said a refresh, keeping most of the body panels the same, but changing things like the front and rear bumpers, lights, and wheels, runs about 200 million. Offering an extension of the maverick's body style I would say would cost somewhere between the two, let's say 400 million dollars to do the tooling for a longer bed sides, bed floor, and rear of the cab, while also making adjustments to the assembly plant to produce that body style.

So 400 million, factor in another 50 million or so. Every time you offer a new body style, you have to put it through the entire process of government certification for emissions testing and safety all over again, that was around 50 million dollars in the late 90s, I don't know what the cost is now, I'm being generous, and keeping it the same.

Add in a few hundred million for the work Ford's engineers and designers have to put in to get it to work properly, to test the truck for durability, refinement, etc, over the course of several years.

That brings us up to let's make it 650 million dollars. I don't think people realize just how expensive the auto industry is. Basically everything is hundreds of millions, or billions of dollars to do. There is no such thing as "This will only cost a few million" when you're talking about making extensive changes to an automotive product. To put it into perspective, the 1980s original tarus costed 3 billion dollars in the 1980s to develop, about 7 billion by modern standards. Basically all of Ford's vehicle programs are billion dollar investments if not more.

Ford Maverick 2025 Maverick refresh and other rumors (from display manager at auto show) IMG_20240207_101535
 
Last edited:

colinl

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Colin
Joined
Jun 21, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
5,440
Reaction score
6,175
Location
ICT
Vehicle(s)
'22 Maverick Lariat AWD, '22 Bronco OBX 2-Door
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
So I did some quick research, and while it's not perfect, I found a guy who spent his career overseeing the tooling for car company. It was his job to manage the expenses of manufacturing a new car. I'll include his quote below, but he said to do all the tooling, all the new metal presses and molds for an all new body, is around 600 million dollars. He said a refresh, keeping most of the body panels the same, but changing things like the front and rear bumpers, lights, and wheels, runs about 200 million. Offering an extension of the maverick's body style I would say would cost somewhere between the two, let's say 400 million dollars to do the tooling for a longer bed sides, bed floor, and rear of the cab, while also making adjustments to the assembly plant to produce that body style.

So 400 million, factor in another 50 million or so. Every time you offer a new body style, you have to put it through the entire process of government certification for emissions testing and safety all over again, that was around 50 million dollars in the late 90s, I don't know what the cost is now, I'm being generous, and keeping it the same.

Add in a few hundred million for the work Ford's engineers and designers have to put in to get it to work properly, to test the truck for durability, refinement, etc, over the course of several years.

That brings us up to let's make it 650 million dollars. I don't think people realize just how expensive the auto industry is. Basically everything is hundreds of millions, or billions of dollars to do. There is no such thing as "This will only cost a few million" when you're talking about making extensive changes to an automotive product. To put it into perspective, the 1980s original tarus costed 3 billion dollars in the 1980s to develop, about 7 billion by modern standards. Basically all of Ford's vehicle programs are billion dollar investments if not more.

IMG_20240207_101535.jpg
I googled also. half billion to a billion for a new model or major redesign pretty standard. I don't think there is any way to know Ford's cost for revisions unless you're high-level insider...

but in case it isn't abundantly clear, I am saying you're right, hundreds of millions.

outside of fleet, I can't see there being anywhere near enough sales of a supercab (rear half-doors) or 2 door maverick to justify it. but the fleet will want the hybrid and first they have to be able to make more hybrids or it's all moot.
 

Sponsored

Krrr

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
180
Reaction score
145
Location
SW PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I'd settle for a pass through design. I take it this means: a door between the bed and cab. Good read. Keep it up.
 

Maverickman74

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Shane
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Threads
65
Messages
5,598
Reaction score
7,792
Location
Maui HI
Vehicle(s)
96 Bronco, 91 Comanche, 93 ZJ, 80 Eagle, Bicycle
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
I highly doubt the Comanche model would work either of the CAFE or safety standards of today. I don't think the weight of the reinforced frame would help fuel efficiency (the main goal of the Maverick) nor with crash crumple zones for safety standards. Also, I think you're over simplifying the Comanche's frame a little bit as my Google search is showing it was more of a hybrid between a BOF and the Cherokee's unibody construction. Plus, the XJ Cherokee that the Comanche was based off of was designed as an off-road vehicle. Ford's C2 is not an off-road platform; that's why people have called the Bronco Sport a "soft roader" as it's literally just a boxy Escape with a shorter wheelbase and a dual clutch transmission.

I will say this: if Ford did try a Comanche model, it would have to be 1) on a new platform 2) support a hybrid powertrain for CAFE standards, and 3) be shared with the (recently retired in the US) Transit Connect van. This way, the two commercial purposes of the platform can sustain each other. However with the amount of fleet Mavericks that are around the country and the Transit Connect being recently discontinued in the US, I still think you are better off hoping for the SCAB long-bed Ranger coming to the US as the SCAB variant already exists in other parts of the world.
Other realities aside. The XJ and Comanche were really based off of the things AMC learned with the Eagle. Both are very much just a bunch of stamped sheet metal. I have built and modified a few of em. They require bolting as well as welding items to them to make em solid. That front end tube that runs around the engine bay of our Mavericks is tougher than anything structural in the Comanche other than the layered up X braced frame in the rear end. The point is blending the right welded stampings on to the rear portion of the Mavericks chassis could make it a more useful commercial vehicle. They basically already have with the creation of the Maverick, they just need to shift the cutoff. Getting around the CAFE wheelbase standards to make it work with all that mess of a regulatory standard is the only trouble.
 

rmay635703

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Ryan
Joined
Apr 27, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
107
Reaction score
58
Location
WisConSin
Vehicle(s)
Subaru 360, Comutacar, Honda Insight, Dodge Ram
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
No. But luckily, no, it's not hundreds of millions to develop a supercab or even 2 door maverick with a longer bed. 😂

I am not in the industry but if we're all tossing out wild guesses I would say more like 5 to 10 million. Bet there's a way to guess at that from Ford's sec 10k filings.
If they didn’t need to recrash test the rig it could be done for a couple hundred thousand.

.gov likes to grab about $15 million if they consider whatever it is you made as a different platform.

Honestly the best thing we could ever do as a country is ban the Regan era gray market and platform laws and make our industry crash and emissions reciprocal with any first world country like Europe/Japan.

Europe is able to build custom unibodies cars with any engine or transmission that you want, their cars certainly aren’t unsafe so I see no reason for our draconian platform requirements that drive our cars to become a single style with a single engine due to all the regulatory cost.


So I did some quick research, and while it's not perfect, I found a guy who spent his career overseeing the tooling for car company. It was his job to manage the expenses of manufacturing a new car. I'll include his quote below, but he said to do all the tooling, all the new metal presses and molds for an all new body, is around 600 million dollars. He said a refresh, keeping most of the body panels the same, but changing things like the front and rear bumpers, lights, and wheels, runs about 200 million. Offering an extension of the maverick's body style I would say would cost somewhere between the two, let's say 400 million dollars to do the tooling for a longer bed sides, bed floor, and rear of the cab, while also making adjustments to the assembly plant to produce that body style.

So 400 million, factor in another 50 million or so. Every time you offer a new body style, you have to put it through the entire process of government certification for emissions testing and safety all over again, that was around 50 million dollars in the late 90s, I don't know what the cost is now, I'm being generous, and keeping it the same.

Add in a few hundred million for the work Ford's engineers and designers have to put in to get it to work properly, to test the truck for durability, refinement, etc, over the course of several years.

That brings us up to let's make it 650 million dollars. I don't think people realize just how expensive the auto industry is. Basically everything is hundreds of millions, or billions of dollars to do. There is no such thing as "This will only cost a few million" when you're talking about making extensive changes to an automotive product. To put it into perspective, the 1980s original tarus costed 3 billion dollars in the 1980s to develop, about 7 billion by modern standards. Basically all of Ford's vehicle programs are billion dollar investments if not more.

IMG_20240207_101535.webp
Of coarse it’s not possible to launch a new body style the old way, lol.

Those numbers are assuming the classic exchange of gigapresses and full automation for zero labor outcomes.

Needless to say your numbers are completely wrong for the existing Maverick as well because the Volume isn’t high enough to justify the expenditures your noting for an aluminum cast vehicle.

The Maverick is not a cybertruck and is built using many classic low cost, low specialty tooling methods
 
Last edited:

Draiders

2.5L Hybrid
Member
First Name
David
Joined
Mar 3, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
24
Reaction score
48
Location
Missouri
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Regardless of what the Display guy said, I seriously doubt that Ford will do a Hybrid Four-Wheel Drive. The weight it would add would effect the fuel economy, and Ford NEEDS the higher fuel economy to deal with CAFE and Biden.
Or they do produce the hybrid awd because it would improve cafe numbers and provide a more expensive hybrid to fleece us with. I have read tons of comments on here from people who bougt the eco to get awd that said they wanted the hybrid but needed awd
 

The-X

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2024
Threads
5
Messages
108
Reaction score
69
Location
Midwest
Vehicle(s)
Maverick XLT
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
It only adds about 200 pounds total in production so not very much weight. The 2025 Maverick hybrid awd powertrain is already being sold in for Europe vehicles and gets excellent fuel economy in the euro tests
It's also not a weight issue, it's a torque issue. The weight is just basically the average 2 and a half kids. The torque of driving the extra wheels, even if only temporarily, is what would overstrain the hybrids electric motor and related components like engine mountings and so on even if the general consumer will pretty much only activate the awd system occasionally.

So they'd need likely a beefier electric drive system to be able to run the AWD. It has to be able to power the whole system under high demand for "a duration" whatever that minimum is. Meaning all the heat generated,l from the high demand operation, stresses on the mounts has to be within a safe limit.

....

Aside from that
I could see also a plugin hybrid version being possible like my joke idea of the EV post. If the larger hybrid battery took up the back of the cab leaving a shelf behind you could possibly push the bed to 6'.

All the while saving the cost of electric windows and locks to no longer there back doors. It'll still cost more than a gas or hybrid but it'd lessen the blow and give the feel of an alternative.

Imagine currently while they're just trying to keep up with demand, they're also concerned about if the good times slow down while trying to keep production costs low. Two body styles in a unibody vehicle and adding new drive options would throw a massive wrench into that
 
Last edited:
Sponsored

Mvrck

2.5L Hybrid
Active member
First Name
E
Joined
May 24, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
26
Reaction score
21
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
It's also not a weight issue, it's a torque issue. The weight is just basically the average 2 and a half kids. The torque of driving the extra wheels, even if only temporarily, is what would overstrain the hybrids electric motor and related components like engine mountings and so on even if the general consumer will pretty much only activate the awd system occasionally.

So they'd need likely a beefier electric drive system to be able to run the AWD. It has to be able to power the whole system under high demand for "a duration" whatever that minimum is. Meaning all the heat generated,l from the high demand operation, stresses on the mounts has to be within a safe limit.
It's just a new transmission. Same one that's already on the road in Europe with a significantly higher tow rating
 

Hunters Edge

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Sid
Joined
Jan 26, 2024
Threads
30
Messages
1,793
Reaction score
2,142
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
F150 crew
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I don't know if this has been posted. So I'm apologizing if it has. Just thought this thread maybe the correct place to post it. FYI don't know if this is correct or just rumors but only time will tell how many of these predictions actually come true.

 

samesk8r

2.5L Hybrid
Member
First Name
Robert
Joined
Jan 10, 2022
Threads
3
Messages
17
Reaction score
26
Location
Ypsilanti, MIchigan
Vehicle(s)
2023 Ford Maverick “Maverick” XLT hybrid Lux
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
That rep doesn't know and is just repeating random speculation they heard from other people that don't know.
No way Ford puts money into all the tooling needed for an extended cab or longer bed. They might rework some if the little lines in the current stamping tool as those tools need a certain rate of rework to stay "sharp" but those will be part of maintenance. New tools for new length/shape panels. No way. That is why mid-cycle refresh focus on headlights/taillights, trim and other items where the tooling is much cheaper to modify or even replace. The supposed update dash is possible given how many of those parts are shared with Bronco Sport and Escape, but will probably be Lariat only. Body stampings? No way. Body stamping tools are huge, some bigger than the truck itself and many times heavier.
AWD hybrid, seems unlikely until a full refresh. I want an AWD PHEV but know it is highly unlikely Ford launches a new generation of the system and then puts the current gen in a future Maverick.
 

rclee

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Rob
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Threads
25
Messages
1,360
Reaction score
2,232
Location
Dayton Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2022 XLT Maverick Lux,A51,Hybrid,Rear Slider.
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
It would be neat if they made a work truck model. Rear seat delete with a flat storage area back there and do a kind of panel wagon treatment to the rear windows. No tooling necessary!
 

Darnon

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jul 4, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
5,705
Reaction score
7,203
Location
WNY
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
It's also not a weight issue, it's a torque issue. The weight is just basically the average 2 and a half kids. The torque of driving the extra wheels, even if only temporarily, is what would overstrain the hybrids electric motor and related components like engine mountings and so on even if the general consumer will pretty much only activate the awd system occasionally.

So they'd need likely a beefier electric drive system to be able to run the AWD. It has to be able to power the whole system under high demand for "a duration" whatever that minimum is. Meaning all the heat generated,l from the high demand operation, stresses on the mounts has to be within a safe limit.
They more or less use the same hybrid system in an AWD configuration on the Escape just by bolting on a PTU to the transmission, driveshaft, rear drive unit, and CVs. No "overstraining the electric motor", engine mounts, or generating excessive heat.
Sponsored

 
 







Top