- First Name
- Glenn
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2022
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 4
- Location
- Binghamton NY
- Vehicle(s)
- Toyota Prius & Sienna
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
Had recalls done, no problems.
Sponsored
Dealer is probably affected by the CDK Software hack that happened a few days ago. It may be awhile until things are running smoothly again based on articles I have read.Well , I attempted to take my 23 hybrid in with 2,200 miles on it , for an oil change, and outstanding recalls. I tried to schedule on line, but couldn't get through. So I called the service department. There I was told that their" system had been down for 5 or 6 days, and they can't schedule any service appointments. So, I asked if they were closed. He said no , they can work on previously made appointments. He said to call back in 6 days to see if the problem has been solved.
So, I have active recalls, and my dealer can't even schedule service. Ford doesn't exactly inspire confidence these days.
Hmmmm, I thought recall 24S33 was the update to 23E09?I had 4 recalls done yesterday on my '23 Hybrid.
24S27
24C01
23C41
23E09
Mobile service van hooked up to the jump points under the hood during the update process. Tech stated that while there were four updates total, from his perspective it was more like two. One BCM and one PCM update.
My MTE display is still figuring itself out, but I have no concerns at this point. Like @cactuar I was dragging my feet on getting these done.
If anything changes I will update here.
24S33 doesn't supersede 23E09. Rather it's a recall to address those who had the faulty PCM/SOBDMC software applied (which could have also been for reasons outside of 23E09).Hmmmm, I thought recall 24S33 was the update to 23E09?
I had 2 "limp mode" occurrences after having 23E09 done in early March. Had 24S33 done beginning of June.
I received this recall letter at the beginning of May after having 23E09 done in early March. 24S33 seems to supersede 23E09 to me?24S33 doesn't supersede 23E09. Rather it's a recall to address those who had the faulty PCM/SOBDMC software applied (which could have also been for reasons outside of 23E09).
@Darnon is right.I received this recall letter at the beginning of May after having 23E09 done in early March. 24S33 seems to supersede 23E09 to me?
That's the reason the turn signal recall had the recall. Seems like it was because the first recall was incomplete as the load for the passenger turn signal was not taken or something like that.The only problem I experienced after the recall’s was hyper flashing of my rear turn signal lights. I replace my original bulbs with Lasfit led bulbs before recall’s with no issues. Afterwards, experienced hyper flashing. Lasfit even sent me, free of charge, new and improved bulbs but the hyper flashing still continues on and off.
Thousands of dealerships many brands that use pretty much the same software are in the same boat! Service appointments as well as updating work done, purchasing, delivering, almost anything that happens. The software mainframe plus who knows what else suffered a Ransome ware attack on , I think the 15th or 16th of June. Some dealers are attempting to do everything manually and then enter all into computers later. Reported data for June will not be entered until at least July. IT'S NOT JUST FORD!Well , I attempted to take my 23 hybrid in with 2,200 miles on it , for an oil change, and outstanding recalls. I tried to schedule on line, but couldn't get through. So I called the service department. There I was told that their" system had been down for 5 or 6 days, and they can't schedule any service appointments. So, I asked if they were closed. He said no , they can work on previously made appointments. He said to call back in 6 days to see if the problem has been solved.
So, I have active recalls, and my dealer can't even schedule service. Ford doesn't exactly inspire confidence these days.