2025 Ford Maverick Refresh / Facelift?

[lajlmt]

my vote:
1. Larger screen, lose the useless cubby
2. Option for a larger bed.
3. Ditch the bluish interor

1 and 2 but iI like 3

Sponsored

 

[TheRealYankeeClipper]

Well, blue is a cool color and has calming and comforting affects from a color theory perspective so I'm sure there's a very specific reason they chose blue but I get what you're saying.

Fun fact! As a color blind person, I never noticed the blue until someone pointed it out. My mind assumed it way grey haha

 

[1929]

Next week manufacturers may build 2025 Model Year if they choose to.

 

[coryjoon]

Maybe '25 Maverick gets a mid-cycle refresh with added features like ventilated seats on the Lariat trim and upgraded exterior elements such as full LED lights and fog lights.

 

[Automate]

Maybe '25 Maverick gets a mid-cycle refresh with ... fog lights.

I doubt the Mav will ever get fog lights.
https://fordauthority.com/2022/12/ford-lineup-will-eventually-ditch-fog-lights-altogether/

 

[coryjoon]

I doubt the Mav will ever get fog lights.
https://fordauthority.com/2022/12/ford-lineup-will-eventually-ditch-fog-lights-altogether/

Maybe!

 

[colinl]

Fun fact! As a color blind person, I never noticed the blue until someone pointed it out. My mind assumed it way grey haha

There are a lot of types of color blindness.

I used to work with a guy who had a green sedan. It got hit in the parking lot, and he was describing it to the security as a blue car. Everyone was like ?? but then we realized he's color blind. He owned a green car for years, thought it was blue.

 

[Blacksheep308]

Offer the 1.5L as base motor?
Back seat delete?
Fog lights?

If they offered the 2.3L they better call it the Grabber package!

Just offer the 2.5L without hybrid. The 2.5L in the Fusion made over 175 hp, and is reliable vs POS 1.5L turbo.

 

[Azmig88]

Here is the answer:

3.0-Liter Twin Turbocharged EcoBoost V6 – 494 HP

After that, it could always been modified to increase power and performance. But it would be a good starting place

 

[Superg0]

2.7 twin turbo 325hp 400lb-ft that is in my F-150 would be crazy in my Maverick

 

[colinl]

Here is the answer:

3.0-Liter Twin Turbocharged EcoBoost V6 – 494 HP

After that, it could always been modified to increase power and performance. But it would be a good starting place

I know it's a joke, but it's a good one. the 3.0tt and 3.5tt are some of the best engines Ford makes right now.

I will be shocked if it's the 2.7tt and on the one hand that would be awesome, on the other it's a lot heavier than a 2.3 and I think the 2.3 can do anything the Maverick platform needs.

there's no reason a 2.3 couldn't use the Focus RS specs, that powertrain has (had?) awesome low end and midrange, and the 8F57 would be able to handle the torque and then some.

 

[LSchicago]

Well maybe that's not for you, but I and MANY OTHERS want the AWD Hybrid. Your assumptions are just that, yours.

I love the fact that the Hybrid is FWD. Getting 43-53MPG is pretty awesome When I paid $25K for it. Zero need for me to get an AWD Hybrid that always carries a mileage penalty, and might be helpful a couple days of the year. They should offer both though, so those who feel they need it can be happy.

 

[LSchicago]

2.7 twin turbo 325hp 400lb-ft that is in my F-150 would be crazy in my Maverick

No need. They already have a 405HP 3.0TT Ranger.

 

[Azmig88]

No need. They already have a 405HP 3.0TT Ranger.

WOW!
I never realized a Ranger and a Maverick were the same vehicle.
Thanks for the info

 

[LSchicago]

WOW!
I never realized a Ranger and a Maverick were the same vehicle.
Thanks for the info

Why would Ford build a Hi Perf Econo truck? LOL. They want you to move up classes not down.

Sponsored