Sponsored

Lower Octane Fuel

Mightybeast

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Adam
Joined
Dec 28, 2021
Threads
64
Messages
436
Reaction score
286
Location
Oklahoma
Vehicle(s)
Maverick hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
Problem is that fuel additives are necessary to have in order to prevent gas separation, premature adjust and corrosion/oxidation of internal parts. The ugly truth of it its ethanol/alcohol based. Alcohol produces les torque/power. Putting more ethanol in the fuel is counterproductive. At same time..... Alcohol is hydrophilic...meaning that 1 drop of water will separate water and alcohol. And as we know water and alcohol do not mix. But good about it that standard tank full of gas will be able safely burn cup of water with out any issues.
Sponsored

 

Mightybeast

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Adam
Joined
Dec 28, 2021
Threads
64
Messages
436
Reaction score
286
Location
Oklahoma
Vehicle(s)
Maverick hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
Just as I was saying... It will be hard to notice difference. It is hard to have stable reading with 87 to start with. I only use 87 as manual recommended. And it's hot in Oklahoma as you know...not issues with knocking or performance.

Ford Maverick Lower Octane Fuel Screenshot_20230929-174322
 

RRaynor2

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 20, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
186
Reaction score
302
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Lariat
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Incorrect. Computer will not do that again unless you will force it to do. Do you remember in old days when mechanic used to do any work on intakes, filters and fuel system they had to unplug battery? The reason was Cpu will learn habits of driving in the first 14 min of driving. And adjust fuel/air ration accordingly. While it is possible to disconnect EB battery...... And wait 15min.... It is a bit problematic with Hybrid.
The Ford manual for my 1.5L Ecoboost Fusion literally says it will retard the timing if you use 87, which results in a slight loss of power and mpg. While the Maverick manual does not explicitly state this, it is also a direct injection Ecoboost engine. Did the ford engineers put that in the manual for fun? Is Ford in a conspiracy with big oil to trick you into buying premium? A Direct inject, turbocharged engine will achieve optimal engine performance with premium fuel. That is just a fact.

I agree with you that it probably isn't worth the extra cost, though. The gains are only noticable under significant under load (towing). The video you posted is not applicable. That is a small, naturally aspirated generator. Even so, his data suggested improved MPG and performance, even if minute.

The science behind engine knocking is fairly well understood. Timing adjustments are needed to prevent knock, and lower octane fuel is more prone to knocking.

This is from the wiki on "engine knock". You can see the very first entry is retarding the timing. Your onboard computer will absolutly do this if you use 87.


Detonation can be prevented by any or all of the following techniques:
  • retarding ignition timing
  • the use of a fuel with high octane rating, which increases the combustion temperature of the fuel and reduces the proclivity to detonate
  • enriching the air–fuel ratio which alters the chemical reactions during combustion, reduces the combustion temperature and increases the margin to detonation
  • reducing peak cylinder pressure
  • decreasing the manifold pressure by reducing the throttle opening or boost pressure
  • reducing the load on the engine
 

RRaynor2

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 20, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
186
Reaction score
302
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Lariat
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Just as I was saying... It will be hard to notice difference. It is hard to have stable reading with 87 to start with. I only use 87 as manual recommended. And it's hot in Oklahoma as you know...not issues with knocking or performance.

Screenshot_20230929-174322.jpg
I see now that you have a hybrid. You will definitely not benefit from using premium at all. Hybrids use a naturally aspirated, port injected Atkinson engine. OP has an Ecoboost, which will see slightly improved performance and MPG, per Ford engineers and the laws of Thermodynamics.
 

LM42

2.0L EcoBoost
Banned
Banned
First Name
Luke
Joined
Jan 21, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
760
Reaction score
1,173
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Vehicle(s)
Maverick XLT FX4 EB
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Incorrect. Computer will not do that again unless you will force it to do. Do you remember in old days when mechanic used to do any work on intakes, filters and fuel system they had to unplug battery? The reason was Cpu will learn habits of driving in the first 14 min of driving. And adjust fuel/air ration accordingly. While it is possible to disconnect EB battery...... And wait 15min.... It is a bit problematic with Hybrid.
That is not incorrect. Modern cars will retard or advance timing electronically all the time. In part due to the knock sensor, which is the reason why sometimes 87 can be problematic especially in hot weather or when towing or otherwise under heavy load.
 

Sponsored

710-oil-614

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Cal
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
6,025
Reaction score
11,812
Location
Ohio...but I'd rather be in Boone.
Vehicle(s)
2025 Hybrid AWD Lariat
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Just as I was saying... It will be hard to notice difference. It is hard to have stable reading with 87 to start with. I only use 87 as manual recommended. And it's hot in Oklahoma as you know...not issues with knocking or performance.

Screenshot_20230929-174322.jpg
No. The manual does not recommend 87.

MTC can sit here and debate all day long the benefits of using 91 or higher, but one thing is not up for debate - The manual does not recommend that you use 87.

The manual clearly recommends 91 or higher. Show me where I am wrong.
 

GPSMan

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Banned
First Name
John
Joined
Jul 28, 2022
Threads
52
Messages
4,325
Reaction score
5,340
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
Many
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
My wife's sister Mercedes says premium is required. The higher cost of premium is not worth it. Regular is fine in the Maverick.
They recommend it.
Required to meet some performance standard, probably.
Required to run, not likely.
 
Sponsored

Ranch

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Sep 19, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
928
Reaction score
1,011
Location
Sacramento CA
Vehicle(s)
2023 Marverick FX4 4K
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
No. The manual does not recommend 87.

MTC can sit here and debate all day long the benefits of using 91 or higher, but one thing is not up for debate - The manual does not recommend that you use 87.

The manual clearly recommends 91 or higher. Show me where I am wrong.
Does the Maverick owners manual recommend that owners not use 87 octane for normal driving?
 

NJBob

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Dec 25, 2021
Threads
139
Messages
2,391
Reaction score
1,579
Location
New Jersey
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick, 2003 MR2, 2019 Forrester, 1969 Z/28
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
They recommend it.
Required to meet some performance standard, probably.
Required to run, not likely.
That would be a big save for sure. Not sure why she even got a Mercedes. Thinks it's a status symbol I guess.
 

BlueSnake77

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
519
Reaction score
513
Location
Rochester NY
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick XLT Ecoboost
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
My Maverick seems to get the best mileage using 90 octane non-ethanol (that is the highest octane non-ethanol I've been able to find). Better than 93 octane ethanol blend even.
 

OneAlienBoi

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Kev
Joined
Jul 22, 2022
Threads
59
Messages
1,246
Reaction score
2,324
Location
Utah
Vehicle(s)
Explorer
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
We run 85 in our hybrid, no issues. You take a tiny bit in terms of performance, but that's about it.
 

NJBob

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Dec 25, 2021
Threads
139
Messages
2,391
Reaction score
1,579
Location
New Jersey
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick, 2003 MR2, 2019 Forrester, 1969 Z/28
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Nice you can get non ethanol gas. Can't get that here in NJ.
Sponsored

 
 







Top