THe Prius engine is an Atkinson Cycle engine as well. The valve timing and the actualization is variable. Ford licensed this tech from Toyota...theirs works identically...and I am a former (retired) toyota factory hybrid tech. They will see 13:1, not all the time...but they will.Geometric compression ratios are pretty meaningless in engines with boost or modified intake volume, as in Atkinson engines. @Wire4money is spot-on.
In genchem you are taught acidity is a function of protons (H+) density such that pH =-logH+ Concentration. Later you learn about other kinds of acids like Lewis bases which are actually e- pair donors (in aqueous solutions they would absorb H+) sometimes they are referred to as Brønsted–Lowry basesMy understanding comes from the tribological side of it, but as I understand it acid in oil travels more in pockets rather than being an actual solution. This is why the AN is used more prevalently than TAN, since it is more representative for machine surfaces.
I am no chemist though.
Whatever you say champ.In genchem you are taught acidity is a function of protons (H+) density such that pH =-logH+ Concentration. Later you learn about other kinds of acids like Lewis bases which are actually e- pair donors (in aqueous solutions they would absorb H+) sometimes they are referred to as Brønsted–Lowry bases
don’t worry it just means that everything you learned from n chemistry is wrong, and stays that way beyond Quantum Chemistry and then you get close enough to the truth to realize the difference between physics, chemistry biology and baking is just scale.
It’s called Wittgenstein's ladderWhatever you say champ.
With "Theoretically, so long as the TBN is over 0, TAN is 0. But that’s only in an ideal world (which we ain’t in)" as your understanding of AN/BN, I concede that you will never listen to me (your understanding is incorrect when it comes to oil analysis). So you win, take joy in whatever you want. It's not like I teach oil analysis for a living....It’s called Wittgenstein's ladder
6.54
“My propositions serve as elucidations in the following way: anyone who understands me eventually recognizes them as nonsensical, when he has used them—as steps—to climb beyond them. (He must, so to speak, throw away the ladder after he has climbed up it.)
He must transcend these propositions, and then he will see the world aright.”
Have I not consistently stated that I have been simplifying things, implying such propositions as the ideal gas law are a good place to start understanding?With "Theoretically, so long as the TBN is over 0, TAN is 0. But that’s only in an ideal world (which we ain’t in)" as your understanding of AN/BN, I concede that you will never listen to me (your understanding is incorrect when it comes to oil analysis). So you win, take joy in whatever you want. It's not like I teach oil analysis for a living....
Like I said, you win, here's 25 internet points.Have I not consistently stated that I have been simplifying things, implying such propositions as the ideal gas law are a good place to start understanding?
But Yeah /plonk
Ford actually produces very good filters.Use whatever you want, but don’t go cheap on the filter. Mobil 1 followed by K&N, and no Fram.
Have ever seen a video where they are cut open, I’ll take the Mobil 1Ford actually produces very good filters.
No k&n filters w the nut welded on the end.Use whatever you want, but don’t go cheap on the filter. Mobil 1 followed by K&N, and no Fram.