- First Name
- bill
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2025
- Threads
- 10
- Messages
- 786
- Reaction score
- 1,210
- Location
- Richmond, CA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2024 Maverick XL
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
I prefer P90's.Really
![]()
Sponsored
I prefer P90's.Really
![]()
I was puzzled by Ford not using the name Ranchero for the reanimated "Maverick". But then I found out that they are bringing a new mid-size EV pickup to the market in a couple years, and it's called "Ranchero".The Maverick is a car that wanted to be a truck so Ford gave it a shot before they fully committed to bringing the Ranchero back.
That said, the Maverick is capable of many things a full sized truck can do, but it gets much better fuel mileage than the full sized trucks.
Face it guys, we have the best of both worlds.
Search web for Suzuki S-Presso. Makes the Jimny look like an Expedition. Also before the 2026 model comes out… the most “it’s not a real car, is it” imho.That said I saw a Suzuki Jimny this weekend (mentioned earlier) and WOW that was one of the smallest new cars I've ever seen. Looked like a Jeep the size of a Fiat 500!
Never took to the Rancheros, late 60’s early 70’s El Caminos, were nice!I was puzzled by Ford not using the name Ranchero for the reanimated "Maverick". But then I found out that they are bringing a new mid-size EV pickup to the market in a couple years, and it's called "Ranchero".
I will take “unintended co-inky-dinks” for $200 please, Alex.I think I know why this silly thread started at 4:20.![]()
I wonder why Ford didn't choose Falcon for the Maverick? But, it was called the Falcon Ranchero, so maybe it was too confusing. Like the Transit and Transit Connect.Never took to the Rancheros, late 60’s early 70’s El Caminos, were nice!
My F350 is a full size truck, but I don't need to tow 15,000 pounds or haul 6000 pounds daily. The Maverick will save a lot of miles on my diesel truck, and is much cheaper to operate. It is also a very convenient tax write off this year.*from 1973
![]()
Whew, in my old eyes, that’s one ugly ass vehicle. But in its day probably mildly popular? I always preferred the El Camino over the Ranchero. Guess it’s sorta like one man’s junk is treasure to anotherI wonder why Ford didn't choose Falcon for the Maverick? But, it was called the Falcon Ranchero, so maybe it was too confusing. Like the Transit and Transit Connect.![]()
The C-10 ran from 191-246” long, the second gen F-100 was 189”, and the Maverick is 199. Full size truck confirmed.I guess it depends on which "full" size you compare it with , the old model T pickup, or the 1950's F-100 ?
It would be interesting to compare the dimensions of either or both, anyone have them?
Or is the Cab on the Maverick much bigger?That bed size for the 73 is much bigger.
The 70-71 Rancheros and 78-79's were pretty nice IMO.Never took to the Rancheros, late 60’s early 70’s El Caminos, were nice!