IF you want to base your decision on the affordability to the Ranger….test the the XL ….which is what most commercial buyers will order
Sponsored
Probably, but since I ordered an XLT hybrid, I preferred it this wayIF you want to base your decision on the affordability to the Ranger….test the the XL ….which is what most commercial buyers will order
Thats cool, I had never heard of these guys before. Good to know they considered highly. I was about to completely write them off after the glossy matte commentIf you know these guys you know that they are ruthless and will absolutely tear a vehicle apart if it deserves it. They are the most critical and most technical in their deep dives of almost all on YouTube. A on Autos, Redline are close but without humor and raw opinions. The fact that they say they like the truck says a lot.
I can see that perspective if you have never seen their work before. These are more "initial thoughts" as they mentioned they will be looking at the 2.0 as well as talking about their discussions with engineers.I'm glad they liked it, but this review wasn't very good. It just told me constantly that the maverick was cheap.
You realize they were talking about different parts of the interior, right? They spacificly said the dash was glossy, and the rest had a matte finish.- The first guy says the matte interior is too glossy. Matte and Glossy are the exact opposite of each other! LOL.
Yes, that is the standard setup for nearly all torsion beam rear end vehicles since the 70s. What about it looks concerning to you?Idk if other platforms use the same rear setup, but the rear springs (4:24 in video) seems like it would be a concern in the future. What do I know though??