Sponsored

Rear Spring Compatibility (Lobo/4K)

Tbone289

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Terry
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,979
Reaction score
3,350
Location
MO
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mav FX4, '12 Focus SE Sport, '01 Focus ZX3, '00 Jeep XJ, '67 Bronco
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
It could be, but the Tremor and Lobo have completely different springs so why would they both have the same lowered tow and payload? The only thing they have in common (which is different from other Mavericks) is the RDU
Because the Tremor has softer springs than the standard AWD as well. Many have commented about it riding softer.
Sponsored

 
OP
OP

justiz00

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 13, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
230
Reaction score
304
Location
North America
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
It could be, but the Tremor and Lobo have completely different springs so why would they both have the same lowered tow and payload? The only thing they have in common (which is different from other Mavericks) is the RDU
I thought they ran a liquid cooled RDU and the twin clutch rear axle. Remembered that the RDU was what sent power to the rear after I started typing and just went with it.
 

Maverick123

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2025
Threads
34
Messages
881
Reaction score
1,528
Location
Canada
Vehicle(s)
Waiting
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I thought they ran a liquid cooled RDU and the twin clutch rear axle. Remembered that the RDU was what sent power to the rear after I started typing and just went with it.
Oh! I thought RDU was Ford-speak for the twin clutch torque vectoring rear differential 😄 I can see how my argument sounds totally wrong

Thanks for correcting me. What I meant to say is that maybe the lower payload & towing limit on Lobo & Tremor is because of the special rear differential that they both use
 

Tbone289

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Terry
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,979
Reaction score
3,350
Location
MO
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mav FX4, '12 Focus SE Sport, '01 Focus ZX3, '00 Jeep XJ, '67 Bronco
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
What I meant to say is that maybe the lower payload & towing limit on Lobo & Tremor is because of the special rear differential that they both use
Maybe. I'm not much for the speculation game, as it always seems a waste of time. If I get some time, I'll look to see if the specs are available from Dana. I wouldn't know where to look up the spring rates, but they have an effect on payload and tongue weight ratings as well.
 
Last edited:

colinl

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Colin
Joined
Jun 21, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
5,440
Reaction score
6,176
Location
ICT
Vehicle(s)
'22 Maverick Lariat AWD, '22 Bronco OBX 2-Door
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Maybe. I'm not much for the speculation game, as it always seems a waste of time. If I get some time, I'll look to see if the specs are available from Dana. I wouldn't know where to look up the spring rates, but they have an effect on payload and tongue weight ratings as well.
a few tremor owners have installed airbag helper springs to address the sag that you get in a tremor when you're heavily loaded.

I see no reason that wouldn't work for this mod, also. if you have installed lobo rear springs and you want to haul 1500 pounds, or tow 4k, might be a pretty good idea to get the airbags.
 

Sponsored

Tbone289

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Terry
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,979
Reaction score
3,350
Location
MO
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mav FX4, '12 Focus SE Sport, '01 Focus ZX3, '00 Jeep XJ, '67 Bronco
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I see no reason that wouldn't work for this mod, also. if you have installed lobo rear springs and you want to haul 1500 pounds, or tow 4k, might be a pretty good idea to get the airbags.
Absolutely. It would still be good to know if, for some reason, the twin clutch RDU had some limitations as well but it seems odd to me. The concern might be clutch pack wear.
 

FSU TONY

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Tony
Joined
Jul 5, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
136
Reaction score
163
Location
South Florida
Vehicle(s)
2025 Maverick XL 2.0
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Installed the lobo rear springs today and removed the fx4 stickers. Changing the rear springs lower it about an
1 “.

IMG_0819.jpeg
Installed the lobo rear springs today and removed the fx4 stickers. Changing the rear springs lower it about an
1 “.

IMG_0819.jpeg
Did it change your driving confort or handling. Usualy they match the front and rear spring rates for better balance and manuverability
 
Sponsored

Pappamoto

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Ken
Joined
May 17, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
97
Reaction score
122
Location
Alabama
Vehicle(s)
2025 Ford Maverick Hybrid Lariat Shadow Black w/BAP
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
What did this cost? I'm assuming that it would cause warranty issues if they could blame the change in springs? I really like the even look though!
 

samandsuzy

2.0L EcoBoost
Member
First Name
SAM
Joined
Apr 14, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
7
Reaction score
21
Location
Crawfordsville, Indiana
Vehicle(s)
2024 XLT. FX4
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
What did this cost? I'm assuming that it would cause warranty issues if they could blame the change in springs? I really like the even look though!
Depends on the dealer. I think I paid 150 for both springs
I did not notice any difference
it is hard to tell in the pic. The back is only 1” higher than the front now
 

derek_tibbys

2.0L EcoBoost
Member
First Name
Derek
Joined
Sep 16, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
6
Reaction score
23
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ford Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I also do not like the raked look on these trucks. I’m a bigger fan of the level look but don’t want to chew up CVs just for a look. I was wondering if you could provide the part numbers for the LOBO springs. Appreciate it. Truck looks great
 
 







Top