Sponsored

My first timed 0-60 runs

ttheroux

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Jan 6, 2022
Threads
8
Messages
45
Reaction score
23
Location
Hamden. CT
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I hit a 1000 miles so I wanted to try a couple of 0-60 runs. On my first pass I measured a 6.11 but I think I stopped the clock a hair early. The 2nd pass was 6.62 which is probably more realistic. I braked torqued on both runs and the first time it chirped the tires and it seemed to launch harder. I have AWD but no 4k package and I’m running 87 octane. I wonder how many 10ths premium would shave off? I don’t plan on doing this often but I had to try it.
Sponsored

 

Deerslayer1980

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Dec 14, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
188
Reaction score
221
Location
Kansas
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I ran a 6.5 on 87 and a 6.3 on 93 a few days apart on a dragy. Best 0-60 so far using 93 is a 6.11. FX4 with the 4k tow gears. 1/4 mile on that run was 14.35.
 

riverrat373

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
M
Joined
May 30, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
54
Reaction score
26
Location
Washington State
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ford Escape, 2009 Ford f150 Supercab 4x4
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Don't fall for the "premium'" ploy. Use what Ford recommends because their engines are designed to get max milage and performance on 87 octane.
 

NJBob

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Dec 25, 2021
Threads
108
Messages
1,999
Reaction score
1,272
Location
New Jersey
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick, 2003 MR2, 2019 Forrester, 1969 Z/28
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I believe Ford recommends premium for best performance on the ecoboost. I would not use it though. Gas is expensive as it is. When gas was cheap during covid I ran a tank of premium on my 2011 ecoboost. While it was noticeable not worth the extra cash.
 

Sponsored

Deerslayer1980

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Dec 14, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
188
Reaction score
221
Location
Kansas
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost

Guv

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
985
Reaction score
856
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Ford
Engine
Undecided
I believe Ford recommends premium for best performance on the ecoboost. I would not use it though. Gas is expensive as it is. When gas was cheap during covid I ran a tank of premium on my 2011 ecoboost. While it was noticeable not worth the extra cash.
To each his own but saying it's a "premium'" ploy" is Fake News.
 
OP
OP

ttheroux

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Jan 6, 2022
Threads
8
Messages
45
Reaction score
23
Location
Hamden. CT
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I just filled it with premium as an experiment. I haven’t noticed a difference yet but maybe the computer hasn’t registered it yet.
 

Maverickman74

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Shane
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Threads
58
Messages
5,052
Reaction score
6,820
Location
Maui HI
Vehicle(s)
96 Bronco, 91 Comanche, 93 ZJ, 80 Eagle, Bicycle
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Engine Masters did a good fuel test episode the other day. Results werent what you would expect.
 
Sponsored

Maverickman74

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Shane
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Threads
58
Messages
5,052
Reaction score
6,820
Location
Maui HI
Vehicle(s)
96 Bronco, 91 Comanche, 93 ZJ, 80 Eagle, Bicycle
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Well, what were they?
It was complicated and I know I would misquote them, but it was Frieberger and Dulcich in the dyno room, so its worth a watch on the youtubes.
 

Decayed

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
yes
Joined
Oct 18, 2021
Threads
47
Messages
3,158
Reaction score
4,866
Location
Directly above the center of the Earth
Vehicle(s)
a car
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
It was complicated and I know I would misquote them, but it was Frieberger and Dulcich in the dyno room, so its worth a watch on the youtubes.
Just watched it. Unless you get knock there is no significant difference in power. Turbos will respond better to high octane since the boost will tend to increase heat and therefore knock, but personally I'd be surprised if you could really tell the difference.
 
OP
OP

ttheroux

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Jan 6, 2022
Threads
8
Messages
45
Reaction score
23
Location
Hamden. CT
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
So I ran through my first tank of premium and I really didn’t notice a big difference in power. Mileage wise I just got 34.8 going from Hamden CT to Rochester NH. I filled up with 87 on my way back and I got over 36 MPG. I was cautious with the throttle but still averaged around 70 mph. Premium is definitely not worth the extra money and I came away very impressed with the highway fuel economy of this little truck.
 

Guv

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
985
Reaction score
856
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Ford
Engine
Undecided
Just watched it. Unless you get knock there is no significant difference in power. Turbos will respond better to high octane since the boost will tend to increase heat and therefore knock, but personally I'd be surprised if you could really tell the difference.
High octane will allow more ignition timing advance which will lower exhaust temps going into the turbo.
Compressor out or boost temps can be higher depending what the ECU will allow. This is why an upgraded intercooler is needed if you start increasing boost pressures.
Sponsored

 
 




Top