Sponsored

Maverick 0-60 times (hybrid / ecoboost)

FirstOnRaceDay

Well-known member
First Name
Devin
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Threads
24
Messages
366
Reaction score
505
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2000 Mercury Grand Marquis LS
Hyundai Santa Fe Limited 2.5 AWD 0-60 in 6.2 at 4000lbs.
Santa Cruz with same powertrain and ROUGHLY 150lbs lighter will likely be in the 6.1 range.
Ford Bronco Sport 2.0 AWD 0-60 0-60 in 5.9 at 3700lbs
Maverick 2.0 is JUST heavier than that. I expect right around the 6.0 range. Close but I think the Maverick will have the edge
Sponsored

 

zackmd1

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Zack
Joined
Jun 12, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
216
Reaction score
482
Location
Maryland
Vehicle(s)
1970 Mustang 429BB / 2019 Tesla Model 3
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Something to consider as well is the gearing, towing package will have a different gearing ratio giving more torque off the line making it's slightly quicker.
Bronco Sport has a very similar gear ratio to the tow package so likely very similar times.

Also keep in mind those weights are likely top spec trims so XL and XLT could be (slightly) lighter then the quoted weight.
 

SpacemanSpiff

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Tyreese
Joined
Jun 23, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
354
Reaction score
809
Location
Mid-west
Vehicle(s)
F-15 Eagle
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Hyundai Santa Fe Limited 2.5 AWD 0-60 in 6.2 at 4000lbs.
Santa Cruz with same powertrain and ROUGHLY 150lbs lighter will likely be in the 6.1 range.
Ford Bronco Sport 2.0 AWD 0-60 0-60 in 5.9 at 3700lbs
Maverick 2.0 is JUST heavier than that. I expect right around the 6.0 range. Close but I think the Maverick will have the edge
Motor Tend is estimating for the 2.0L - 2.5L Hybrid
0-60 MPH6.9-8.5 sec (MT est)
 
OP
OP
FirstOnRaceDay

FirstOnRaceDay

Well-known member
First Name
Devin
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Threads
24
Messages
366
Reaction score
505
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2000 Mercury Grand Marquis LS
Motor Tend is estimating for the 2.0L - 2.5L Hybrid
0-60 MPH6.9-8.5 sec (MT est)
I can see 6.9 for the NON FX4/Towing package with the taller rear end. But the fx4/towing package has a shorter rear end. That will help 0-60 times. Close to 6s
 

Sponsored

ThisWas

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
206
Reaction score
517
Location
NH
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Hybrid, 2021 RAV4 Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I don't know how many people are cross-shopping a Maverick and a 1970 Camaro, but I thought you'd like some data for comparison.

Chevrolet Camaro 307 V-8 Turbo-Fire Hydra-Matic (aut. 3) 0-60 mph 9.4 seconds 13.3mpg
Chevrolet Camaro 350 V-8 Turbo-Fire Hydra-Matic (aut. 3) 0-60 mph 7.9 seconds 11.8mpg
Chevrolet Camaro SS 396 Hydra-Matic (aut. 3) 0-60 mph 6.1 seconds 9.2mpg

Source: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/make/chevrolet_usa/camaro_2gen/camaro_2gen/1970.html
 

ElMaverick

Well-known member
First Name
S
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Threads
34
Messages
254
Reaction score
479
Location
Canada
Vehicle(s)
Mazda 3
Engine
Undecided
I don't mind a bit slower acceleration as long as it feels torquey, I test drove the escape hybrid and the 2.5 was just wailing at high revs and was really loud, even the escape 1.5 3 cyl feels torquier and faster even though they have similar 0-60 times
 

clavicus

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 21, 2021
Threads
36
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
1,994
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Lariat Lux Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Something to consider as well is the gearing, towing package will have a different gearing ratio giving more torque off the line making it's slightly quicker.
I was under the impression that electric motor of the hybrid is used for initial torque (electric motors generally have great torque?) which may be greater than the 2.0 engine off the line? I don't know how this works just wondering out loud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

wiseguy3501

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Cory
Joined
Jun 23, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
50
Reaction score
68
Location
Lakeville, MN
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I was under the impression that electric motor of the hybrid is used for initial torque (electric motors generally have great torque?) which may be greater than the 2.0 engine off the line? I don't know how this works just wondering out loud.
The HP and torque numbers advertised include the electric motor, meaning that's what you get even off the line. Electric motors have great torque, but this is supplemental to the engine. Granted, there may be a nice boost right away that's better than the 2.0, but in the overall 0-60, once the 2.0 turbo gets spooled up, it'll win.
 
OP
OP
FirstOnRaceDay

FirstOnRaceDay

Well-known member
First Name
Devin
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Threads
24
Messages
366
Reaction score
505
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2000 Mercury Grand Marquis LS
I was under the impression that electric motor of the hybrid is used for initial torque (electric motors generally have great torque?) which may be greater than the 2.0 engine off the line? I don't know how this works just wondering out loud.
Ford Maverick Maverick 0-60 times (hybrid / ecoboost) 07B9D8E3-90CD-44EB-B6E5-00F41AB1EF1F

looking at the 2.5 n/a Hyundai vs Hybrid Maverick you can see the slightly more torque in lower rev range.
thats Where the Electric motor comes into play.
 
Sponsored

clavicus

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 21, 2021
Threads
36
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
1,994
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Lariat Lux Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
07B9D8E3-90CD-44EB-B6E5-00F41AB1EF1F.jpeg

looking at the 2.5 n/a Hyundai vs Hybrid Maverick you can see the slightly more torque in lower rev range.
thats Where the Electric motor comes into play.
Dang I have no idea how to read this graph
 
OP
OP
FirstOnRaceDay

FirstOnRaceDay

Well-known member
First Name
Devin
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Threads
24
Messages
366
Reaction score
505
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2000 Mercury Grand Marquis LS
Dang I have no idea how to read this graph
It’s a Dynograph Curve.
The key is at the top.
lighter colors are Torque (PoundFeet) darker are Horse Power.

blue is the 2.0 Turbo Maverick
Green is the 2.5 Hybrid Maverick
red is the 2.5 N/A Santa Cruz
Orange is the 2.5 Turbo Santa Cruz.

numbers on the left are values.
numbers on the bottom are RPM.
so if you have your foot flat down on the throttle. This represents what HP and Torque your making AT THE FLYWHEEL at any given RPM.

these are estimated based off of real dynos but gives you a great idea of what the car will do.

so look at the light green vs light red lines. That’s the torque for the Santa cruz and Maverick. Both have similar PEAK numbers. But the ford is higher up.
thanks to the electric motor.

so the hybrid will be a little more peppy then I think people will expect. But don’t expect some kind of crazy EV type acceleration.
 

Xtreme Thunder

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
249
Reaction score
458
Location
NY
Vehicle(s)
Honda, Toyota
Looks like it's 'Tune Time' for the 2.0T! :ROFLMAO:
 

fbov

Well-known member
First Name
Frank
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
452
Reaction score
489
Location
Bushnell's Basin
Vehicle(s)
2020 Escape Hybrid
It’s a Dynograph Curve.
... But the ford is higher up.
thanks to the electric motor. ...
What electric motor? These are all ICE curves. Shapes are very different. EV output starts at peak torque at 0 RPM, stays flat for the "current limited" portion of the curve, then falls off. It won't have Tesla torque levels, but general shape is the same. Love to see EV curves for these cars.
Ford Maverick Maverick 0-60 times (hybrid / ecoboost) 1624926463396
 
OP
OP
FirstOnRaceDay

FirstOnRaceDay

Well-known member
First Name
Devin
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Threads
24
Messages
366
Reaction score
505
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2000 Mercury Grand Marquis LS
What electric motor? These are all ICE curves. Shapes are very different. EV output starts at peak torque at 0 RPM, stays flat for the "current limited" portion of the curve, then falls off. It won't have Tesla torque levels, but general shape is the same. Love to see EV curves for these cars.
1624926463396.png
Correct. So you take that curve and add it to the gas motor (2.5L with 155hp) and you get the curve above.

so you can see vs the N/A Hyundai they both have ~200lbft. But the ford has more torque at 1000rpm then slowly falls down to the same as the Hyundai at redline
Sponsored

 
 




Top