The simulated gear shifts actually alleviate some of the rubber band effect, which is also a likely reason for implementing them. Source: my Subaru has paddle shifters and a CVT, I have first-hand experience with this.We know this is the broader customer concern about CVTs because a few manufacturers have now spent resources to implement simulated gear shifts to replicate fixed ratios under some driving conditions.
We both can speculate all we want, but neither of us knows the true reason for implementing software simulated gears in a CVT.
And when the Maverick's engine isn't even running, then what? It drives like an EV, which is a much closer comparison than to compare it to a traditional CVT.I think what makes a continuously variable transmission drive like a continuously variable transmission is the "continuously variable" part - the holding of engine speed at nearly constant rpm under acceleration while varying the ratio. The vehicle's acceleration is largely detached from a change in engine rpm.
We get it, you like the vroom vroom of a normal transmission. No one is disputing your preferences here. We're just trying to get you to stop equivocating the eCVT with a traditional CVT.This is a driving characteristic that Ford's continuously variable transmission shares with other CVT's. All the wild gesturing about rubber band does not change this fact.
They are not the same thing. Period.
Sponsored
