I think the Maverick got a lot of people, who are like me, who never would have touched a Ford with a ten foot pole. There are many people who want a truck for the utility, but do not want to spend truck money on fuel. That was me. I've needed a truck for work for years, but stuck with a hybrid car because I simply didn't want to spend $200 a week on gas.It makes me wonder how many people who would consider a hybrid hadn't considered a truck before the Maverick was announced.
If their market research started with "Are you looking for a Ford truck?" it'd essentially start solely with the Ford truck market, which as others mention, tends to be more conservative tech-wise.
100% This is my first domestic b/c the value proposition was so good. Lets hope they lastI think the Maverick got a lot of people, who are like me, who never would have touched a Ford with a ten foot pole. There are many people who want a truck for the utility, but do not want to spend truck money on fuel. That was me. I've needed a truck for work for years, but stuck with a hybrid car because I simply didn't want to spend $200 a week on gas.So the Maverick, despite being a Ford got me with the powertrain.
They couldn't make small trucks because of the government equation to figuring fuel economy and CAFE standards. I'd imagine Ford is probably paying a small fine for every ecoboost they sell even now, or maybe the hybrid averages the fleet up.No facts to support this, but a few of us think Ford underpriced the hybrid because their customer research said that nobody wanted them (Ford truck buyers tend to be highly conservative with vehicle styling, electricity, etc.) - and they felt they needed to move hybrids at a loss or at low margin for CAFE reasons. That's total conjecture with zero supporting data. Some day maybe we'll know when Jim Farley writes his memoirs.
I always felt that Ford product planning just BLEW IT BIGTIME. If they'd done proper market research, they would have seen the demand for the hybrid in advance and priced to what the market would bear. But these are the same clowns who spent a full decade publicly arguing that nobody needed a small cheap truck to replace their small cheap Rangers. They would all buy F150s. Then they argued we would all buy midsize Rangers (you can find these auto show interviews if you Google). It apparently took ten years for Ford to figure out something that every small cheap Ranger driver already knew - we weren't going along with Ford's arrogant plan. We drove small cheap trucks because we wanted small cheap trucks.
Motoman had a video where a product planner talks about how he arrived as a product planner, and how he makes his decisions. Worth watching if you can find it. Personally, I'm amazed some OEMs can keep the doors open, between unions and finger pointing and the Peter Principle. I guess there are enough motivated hard workers to compensate.
That's a bit of a rant. But I hope it's at least an interesting rant. All the wild speculation aside, you have to hand it to Ford. They may slip on quality and execution, but they have a solid history of appealing products. Mustang. F150. Bronco. Maverick. They miss the mark now and then (like not delivering a cheap small truck ten years ago), but they seem to have a real feel for what middle America wants.
Definitely me. Anyone could've made it, at or near the same price point, and I would've purchased it.It makes me wonder how many people who would consider a hybrid hadn't considered a truck before the Maverick was announced.
If their market research started with "Are you looking for a Ford truck?" it'd essentially start solely with the Ford truck market, which as others mention, tends to be more conservative tech-wise.
The Maverick's low price and compact size clearly made it a popular choice. But has there been any reporting on whether the Maverick's being a hybrid brought in buyers who wouldn't have bought a truck otherwise?
It's hard for a Ford exec, riding around in a chauffeur driven $100,000 Expedition, to imagine that anyone would want a little truck. If it's priced under $60,000, they would rather walk than ride in it. No clue about the world they live in or about the people who live around them.No facts to support this, but a few of us think Ford underpriced the hybrid because their customer research said that nobody wanted them (Ford truck buyers tend to be highly conservative with vehicle styling, electricity, etc.) - and they felt they needed to move hybrids at a loss or at low margin for CAFE reasons. That's total conjecture with zero supporting data. Some day maybe we'll know when Jim Farley writes his memoirs.
I always felt that Ford product planning just BLEW IT BIGTIME. If they'd done proper market research, they would have seen the demand for the hybrid in advance and priced to what the market would bear. But these are the same clowns who spent a full decade publicly arguing that nobody needed a small cheap truck to replace their small cheap Rangers. They would all buy F150s. Then they argued we would all buy midsize Rangers (you can find these auto show interviews if you Google). It apparently took ten years for Ford to figure out something that every small cheap Ranger driver already knew - we weren't going along with Ford's arrogant plan. We drove small cheap trucks because we wanted small cheap trucks.
Motoman had a video where a product planner talks about how he arrived as a product planner, and how he makes his decisions. Worth watching if you can find it. Personally, I'm amazed some OEMs can keep the doors open, between unions and finger pointing and the Peter Principle. I guess there are enough motivated hard workers to compensate.
That's a bit of a rant. But I hope it's at least an interesting rant. All the wild speculation aside, you have to hand it to Ford. They may slip on quality and execution, but they have a solid history of appealing products. Mustang. F150. Bronco. Maverick. They miss the mark now and then (like not delivering a cheap small truck ten years ago), but they seem to have a real feel for what middle America wants.
Not only were we not interested in a Ford or a truck for our next vehicle, but we weren't even in the market for a new vehicle when the Maverick was announced. Without a hybrid at that pricepoint, it would have been another 3-4 years before we were even considering another vehicle at all.I think the Maverick got a lot of people, who are like me, who never would have touched a Ford with a ten foot pole. There are many people who want a truck for the utility, but do not want to spend truck money on fuel. That was me. I've needed a truck for work for years, but stuck with a hybrid car because I simply didn't want to spend $200 a week on gas.So the Maverick, despite being a Ford got me with the powertrain.
One of the main reasons for ordering my hybrid was that it was standard. 40 MPG truck, that's small, and similarly priced to a Corolla. What more do you want lolJust supply and demand. Much greater demand for the hybrids than the eco's so an expected reaction from Ford. Really surprised that it took them this long. Actually, I was shocked that it was this way to start and was one of the reasons I ordered a Maverick in the first place, on most other vehicles upgrading to the hybrid already came with a premium. That being said if I didn't have the private offer to cover this markup I wouldn't be getting one anymore.