Sponsored

How is your Ecoboost doing on MPG?

hurrah

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Feb 6, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
131
Reaction score
127
Location
Hartville, MO 65667
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger 2012 Ford F250 6.7 2015 Ford XL
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
2023 XLT Tremor--10700 miles 29.4 since new using 91 octane ethanal free mostly rural 2 lane driving very limited city driving. I've found it does around 28MPG in cold weather and 30 plus in warm/hot weather. Probably do a little better if I didn't always seem to be in a hurrry!
Sponsored

 

Tbone91

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Jun 20, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
260
Reaction score
332
Location
Fulton, NY
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ford Maverick XLT FX4, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
2023 XLT Tremor--10700 miles 29.4 since new using 91 octane ethanal free mostly rural 2 lane driving very limited city driving. I've found it does around 28MPG in cold weather and 30 plus in warm/hot weather. Probably do a little better if I didn't always seem to be in a hurrry!
That's pretty good! I tried a tank of non ethanol in mine and I swear it bogged it down. I couldn't empty the tank fast enough to get back to the 93 octane lol
 

MetalThunder

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
MetalThunder
Joined
Dec 17, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
369
Reaction score
800
Location
Blue Water Area / Thumb Coast "Mishigami"
Website
www.automobile-catalog.com
Vehicle(s)
2024 Iconic Silver AWD XLT 4K Lux Ecoboost
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
rural driver - port huron michigan area - drive in to work - 45 miles - Mt . Clemens area (summer get about 34-36 mpg) Winter 30- 32 - i learned early on how the foot affects the pedal with my 22 ecoboost. I avoid freeways and rarely use eco mode unless in city to stop turbo from spooling - only benefit Eco really gives imho - as normal mode gives better mpg all around - no hilly terrain and that helps my situation out too. Best i ever did in an Ecoboost Maverick (22 xl) was a round trip to Port Austin Michigan and back on a quarter tank of gas - was averaging 39-40 mpgs - yes hand figured not metered lol - but i was very conscience of the pedal lol which was tedious at best as i could not get the darn meter to surpass 49mpgs no matter what - and i knew it was lying ;) . If you stay aware of the engine relationship to pedal pressure you will benefit from mpgs hands down. I put it in sport and forget about mpgs lol thats just price of admission for fun times. Moral of the story is a gentle foot and gentle terrain with little stop and go boosts mileage - go figure

Cheers
 

hurrah

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Feb 6, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
131
Reaction score
127
Location
Hartville, MO 65667
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger 2012 Ford F250 6.7 2015 Ford XL
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
That's pretty good! I tried a tank of non ethanol in mine and I swear it bogged it down. I couldn't empty the tank fast enough to get back to the 93 octane lol
I don't have an option on octane as all local gas stations carry non ethanol at 91octane so I don't know what it would do with 93 octane. Mine replaced a Dodge Dakota 5 speed with a 5.2 Liter which got 14.5 MPG. Its fantastic to cut my gas bill almost exactly in half!
 

CaliMav68

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
JL
Joined
Dec 14, 2025
Threads
5
Messages
164
Reaction score
244
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Lariat AWD EB
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I've found ethanol drives my mpgs down. No ethanol for me. 77k total miles. Average still a tick over 30mpg lifetime. Occasional trailering really gives a hit. I'd be closer to 32.
 

Sponsored

Tbone91

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Jun 20, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
260
Reaction score
332
Location
Fulton, NY
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ford Maverick XLT FX4, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
I don't have an option on octane as all local gas stations carry non ethanol at 91octane so I don't know what it would do with 93 octane. Mine replaced a Dodge Dakota 5 speed with a 5.2 Liter which got 14.5 MPG. Its fantastic to cut my gas bill almost exactly in half!
Oh ok, makes sense. Haha I can understand that! Nothing wrong with saving some money on fuel. I came out of a Elantra with no turbo. So while fuel economy was better, I'm very happy I made the switch. My fuel economy hasn't suffered too much, not to mention I can get so much more out of my Maverick.
 

Tbone91

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Jun 20, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
260
Reaction score
332
Location
Fulton, NY
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ford Maverick XLT FX4, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
I've found ethanol drives my mpgs down. No ethanol for me. 77k total miles. Average still a tick over 30mpg lifetime. Occasional trailering really gives a hit. I'd be closer to 32.
For me it's the smiles per gallon rather than the miles 😁 gas, utility bills and taxes, you can't get away from them, might as well have some fun when you can! 🤷‍♂️
 

Dmac34

2.0L EcoBoost
Member
First Name
David
Joined
Dec 19, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
9
Reaction score
47
Location
Midland Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2024 Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
My calculated miles are about 8% lower than shown on the gage. My city MPGs winter are about 38 and summer about 53 MPGs. I am listing to show ICE only owners how disadvantage the hybrid is in winter driving
After a round trip from Michigan to Texas we averaged 27.5mpg at 75 to 80mph, 2025 Lariat 4K AWD.
 

CaliMav68

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
JL
Joined
Dec 14, 2025
Threads
5
Messages
164
Reaction score
244
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Lariat AWD EB
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
For me it's the smiles per gallon rather than the miles 😁 gas, utility bills and taxes, you can't get away from them, might as well have some fun when you can! 🤷‍♂️
I feel that. How old are you, Tbone?
 
 







Top