Sponsored

Fuel Type??

sollymate

2.0L EcoBoost
Active member
First Name
Solly
Joined
Sep 11, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
26
Reaction score
54
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Maverick Lariat, Toyota Rav 4
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
I read over the manual and it said it's built to run on 87 but performs best on 91 or higher. Since I only had my Maverick for a week before I had the deer accident, I only put fuel in it twice, and I used 93 fuel. I was just curious what other Mav owners were putting in their trucks because filling up with 93 can get real expensive real quick, despite the great fuel economy of the truck. I also may sound dumb for this, but is it bad to switch up the fuel you are using for different situations. For example, my family is going on a ski trip in December and I am hoping I'll have the truck back by then. Is it okay to use 87 until the trip and 93 while on the trip? These are probably things I should know, but I've never purchased a new vehicle before this, and now I am trying to be much more thorough.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

Carlitos_92

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2024
Threads
4
Messages
2,252
Reaction score
4,577
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2023 Area 51 XLT EB AWD Lux FX4
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
For normal use, 87 is fine. I use 87 when I am doing long trips where I will just burn multiple tanks of gas on the interstate and anything more would be a waste of money.

If you were towing or asking a lot of the Ecoboost engine, higher octane will allow it to make more power before it starts to adjust due to preignition aka "knock." The takeaway is that the engine knows when it is detonating and will protect itself. You will likely not notice one way or the other.

There is no issue with using 93 vs. 91 if that is what is available. That is what I use most of the time around town because that's what Costco has.

Mixing and matching octane ratings is no issue, either. Technically the "mid grade" 89-ish octane fuels are mixed at the station between tanks of regular and premium.
 

Tbone289

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Terry
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,982
Reaction score
3,351
Location
MO
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mav FX4, '12 Focus SE Sport, '01 Focus ZX3, '00 Jeep XJ, '67 Bronco
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
This is the plan I follow. YMMV

Highway trips:
  • no towing: 87 octane
  • towing: 93 octane

In-town driving:
  • Winter: 87 octane
  • Summer: 89 octane
  • Summer with AC use (85+ degree ambient) or high load (towing) conditions: 93 octane
 

Sponsored

vinnymac

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Vince
Joined
Oct 26, 2022
Threads
24
Messages
706
Reaction score
344
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I read over the manual and it said it's built to run on 87 but performs best on 91 or higher. Since I only had my Maverick for a week before I had the deer accident, I only put fuel in it twice, and I used 93 fuel. I was just curious what other Mav owners were putting in their trucks because filling up with 93 can get real expensive real quick, despite the great fuel economy of the truck. I also may sound dumb for this, but is it bad to switch up the fuel you are using for different situations. For example, my family is going on a ski trip in December and I am hoping I'll have the truck back by then. Is it okay to use 87 until the trip and 93 while on the trip? These are probably things I should know, but I've never purchased a new vehicle before this, and now I am trying to be much more thorough.
I run 93 octane since i emptied out the little bit the factory put in.i have a mild tune for a little more pep in its step
 

crgator

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Ron
Joined
May 10, 2022
Threads
41
Messages
614
Reaction score
954
Location
Space Coast, Florida
Vehicle(s)
2023 Maverick XLT
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I've run 87 since I got my hybrid (Apr 2023), and it runs like a charm. And I live in Central Florida, so it's hot as Hades. ♨
 

710-oil-614

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Cal
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
6,025
Reaction score
11,812
Location
Ohio...but I'd rather be in Boone.
Vehicle(s)
2025 Hybrid AWD Lariat
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
93 top tier only for me.

You do not get the specified power ratings (hp/torque) unless using 91 or higher. I also find the EB singer runs a little smoother on the 93.

That said performance gains can’t be felt by the old butt dyno and I’m likely wasting money but that’s me.
 

colinl

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Colin
Joined
Jun 21, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
5,440
Reaction score
6,177
Location
ICT
Vehicle(s)
'22 Maverick Lariat AWD, '22 Bronco OBX 2-Door
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
when switching from 87 to 91 or 93, make sure to get the tank as low as possible. it can take a full tank or more to fully learn the higher octane.

if you have a scan gauge or are logging with forscan, you can actually see the Knock Octane Modifier. at 3 bars on the coolant temp gauge it starts measuring. it will go to 1.000 if you have good quality fuel. I've personally seen as low as .600 on 91, and I never use 87.

you really only benefit from high octane under heavy load or with 75-100% throttle input. if you baby the throttle everywhere, trying to get best mpg or just in no hurry to get anywhere, the engine never makes enough boost to even benefit from premium fuel unless you climb a steep hill or drive in the mountains.
 
Sponsored

710-oil-614

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Cal
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
6,025
Reaction score
11,812
Location
Ohio...but I'd rather be in Boone.
Vehicle(s)
2025 Hybrid AWD Lariat
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
you really only benefit from high octane under heavy load or with 75-100% throttle input.
I do disagree that you only see benefit under 75% throttle or more.

That is not how fuel mapping works.
 

colinl

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Colin
Joined
Jun 21, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
5,440
Reaction score
6,177
Location
ICT
Vehicle(s)
'22 Maverick Lariat AWD, '22 Bronco OBX 2-Door
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
I do disagree that you only see benefit under 75% throttle or more.

That is not how fuel mapping works.
partially true. you do get some benefit from advanced timing.

but it's much more significant under heavy throttle. at least 50%.
 

Bob The Builder

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Butch
Joined
Dec 2, 2021
Threads
54
Messages
2,597
Reaction score
4,884
Location
Vermont
Vehicle(s)
2020 Jeep Cherokee ** 2023 Mav FX/4
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I only drive 4K a year, so its 91 E-Free for me.

FWIW I see the bennies of this fuel even with light throttle. Many threads talk about the benefits of 91 octane to negate the so called "chugging" effect some of us have experienced and some do not at low RPM.
 

710-oil-614

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Cal
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
6,025
Reaction score
11,812
Location
Ohio...but I'd rather be in Boone.
Vehicle(s)
2025 Hybrid AWD Lariat
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
partially true. you do get some benefit from advanced timing.

but it's much more significant under heavy throttle. at least 50%.
it’s not partially true it is completely true. What you’re saying is logical - the heavier the load (full throttle input) the greater the gains you’ll see using 93 but to say there is no benefit at less than 50% throttle is entirely incorrect.
 
 







Top