Sponsored

2025 tpms different than 22-24

Cubican

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Pedro
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Threads
53
Messages
898
Reaction score
1,686
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Ridgeline, viper, c8
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I just replace wheels on my 25 from a set that I had from a 23 and the tpms don’t want to pair on the 25. I did take it to discount tire for programming but they could not make them work. Any info would be appreciated
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
Cubican

Cubican

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Pedro
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Threads
53
Messages
898
Reaction score
1,686
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Ridgeline, viper, c8
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Contact the dealer and it looks like the 25 does have different sensors than previous models mavericks
 

A.Bursell

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 23, 2023
Threads
11
Messages
663
Reaction score
786
Location
Stanwood, WA
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
I believe Ford changed from 315Mhz to 433Mhz. I had seen where it was supposed to happen sometime in the '24 model year but haven't heard of it actually happening. Sounds like it did for '25.

If you want to buy new sensors, I'd recommend the Schrader EZ Sensor. They are programmable for 315 or 433 and a lot cheaper than OEM. But Schrader does make them for Ford, so they are good quality. Part #33500 is about $25 each. Just need to make sure your installer has a programmer for Schrader if you're going to buy them on your own.
 
OP
OP
Cubican

Cubican

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Pedro
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Threads
53
Messages
898
Reaction score
1,686
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Ridgeline, viper, c8
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I believe Ford changed from 315Mhz to 433Mhz. I had seen where it was supposed to happen sometime in the '24 model year but haven't heard of it actually happening. Sounds like it did for '25.
sure sound like that’s the case still doing some research
 

Don806

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Don
Joined
Oct 3, 2022
Threads
35
Messages
1,208
Reaction score
1,172
Location
SE Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2025 Maverick AWD XLT, Also a 2006 F150 FX4
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
I haven’t swapped my steelies for the XLT wheels on the 25 yet. I’ll find out when I do, but not sure when that’s gonna happen
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
Cubican

Cubican

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Pedro
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Threads
53
Messages
898
Reaction score
1,686
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Ridgeline, viper, c8
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Ok is confirmed the 25 does used a 433 not a 315 mhz the correct TPMs for the 25 is this one
Ford Maverick 2025 tpms different than 22-24 IMG_0787
 

paneubert

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Threads
34
Messages
2,866
Reaction score
4,833
Location
Seattle
Vehicle(s)
2025 Hybrid XLT/4K/AWD/CoPilot/Eruption Green
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Ok is confirmed the 25 does used a 433 not a 315 mhz the correct TPMs for the 25 is this one
IMG_0787.jpg
Well shit. That causes some drama for all of us who have winter tires from prior years. I have a set of tires that have 315's in them that I guess I am going to need to have a tire shop un-mount from the rims, replace the sensors, and re-mount on the rims. Super lame.
 
OP
OP
Cubican

Cubican

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Pedro
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Threads
53
Messages
898
Reaction score
1,686
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Ridgeline, viper, c8
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Well shit. That causes some drama for all of us who have winter tires from prior years. I have a set of tires that have 315's in them that I guess I am going to need to have a tire shop un-mount from the rims, replace the sensors, and re-mount on the rims. Super lame.
That’s the boat I’m in it sucks but it needs to be done
 

A.Bursell

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 23, 2023
Threads
11
Messages
663
Reaction score
786
Location
Stanwood, WA
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Ok is confirmed the 25 does used a 433 not a 315 mhz the correct TPMs for the 25 is this one
IMG_0787.webp
I edited my post earlier, at the same time you were replying I think, to include info on the Schrader sensor I recommend. Schrader is the OEM for Ford and the EZ Sensor is programmable so it can do 315 or 433 -- and it's less than half the price.
 

RR - All the way

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Threads
50
Messages
2,088
Reaction score
3,999
Location
GA
Vehicle(s)
Ram, 2005, 2500 Diesel, 25 Ruby Red XLT
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Sponsored

Lane

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Lane
Joined
Jul 20, 2023
Threads
15
Messages
406
Reaction score
977
Location
Central Wisconsin
Website
photos.app.goo.gl
Vehicle(s)
2023 Area 51 Hybrid XL, 2006 VW Jetta Smyth UTE
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Perhaps as members of the "high tech" generation you guys are unfamiliar with these:

Ford Maverick 2025 tpms different than 22-24 51JwHZG81HL._AC_SL1500_


They do require some effort on the part of the driver...:thumbsdown::teehee::teehee: Cost is about $10
YES!

When I replaced my wheels, I couldn't justify spending ~$225 for another set of sensors when my eyeballs and a pressure gauge will do the same thing. And they've been all I've needed prior to now for all the years I've been driving.

And it takes almost no effort to use Forscan to turn off the monitoring so the nag message no longer pops up.
 

Montana

2.0L EcoBoost
Banned
Banned
Joined
Jun 13, 2023
Threads
24
Messages
4,094
Reaction score
6,347
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
.
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Of course it does.

Can't have people actually saving money.

YES!

When I replaced my wheels, I couldn't justify spending ~$225 for another set of sensors when my eyeballs and a pressure gauge will do the same thing. And they've been all I've needed prior to now for all the years I've been driving.

And it takes almost no effort to use Forscan to turn off the monitoring so the nag message no longer pops up.
You say that but as someone that used to tend to others vehicles, I'd feel alot safer on the road knowing it's harder to miss. I'd wager you could check a random parking lot at your local grocery store and a good number of vehicles would be improperly inflated - most of which are just plain dangerous. But that's a lot of things too - like tail lights, indicators etc etc. Lots of unsafe stuff that shouldn't be on the road but it is because "muh freedom".

And hopefully if/when you get rid of the vehicle, those safety features are re-enabled.
 

b534202

2.5L Hybrid
Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
8
Reaction score
8
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
25 XLT AWD
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
YES!

When I replaced my wheels, I couldn't justify spending ~$225 for another set of sensors when my eyeballs and a pressure gauge will do the same thing. And they've been all I've needed prior to now for all the years I've been driving.

And it takes almost no effort to use Forscan to turn off the monitoring so the nag message no longer pops up.
It looks like Forscan isn't working with the '25 yet.
 

Lane

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Lane
Joined
Jul 20, 2023
Threads
15
Messages
406
Reaction score
977
Location
Central Wisconsin
Website
photos.app.goo.gl
Vehicle(s)
2023 Area 51 Hybrid XL, 2006 VW Jetta Smyth UTE
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
You say that but as someone that used to tend to others vehicles, I'd feel alot safer on the road knowing it's harder to miss. I'd wager you could check a random parking lot at your local grocery store and a good number of vehicles would be improperly inflated - most of which are just plain dangerous. But that's a lot of things too - like tail lights, indicators etc etc. Lots of unsafe stuff that shouldn't be on the road but it is because "muh freedom".
Agreed. But I want to add some food for thought here.

See the highlighting in the post above... it's more commonly the drivers themselves that are unsafe on the road, not the stuff they're driving. I've seen the nicest & newest vehicles ever with distracted inattentive drivers at the wheel. Texting, talking on the phone, navigating a touchscreen (because all the knobs have been taken away), and so on. These people are way more common and more dangerous than an underinflated tire.

But it feels to me like our reliance on tech doesn't make us safer. It more commonly feels like it erodes our good safe driving habits because, hey, why be concerned with it if the vehicle does it for me? For example - how many of us w/ Co-Pilot 360 can say we still turn our head to look over our shoulder when changing lanes? Or who still looks over the other shoulder when backing up when you can just look at the camera view in the monitor in the dash?

Perhaps all the safety gear is good to have on the vehicles of the bad inattentive drivers because it just might keep ME safer from them.

Interesting side-rant: with that back up cam image freeze problem that needs to be fixed, it's a safety feature that has caused accidents. Can't be much more ironic.

And hopefully if/when you get rid of the vehicle, those safety features are re-enabled.
Yes, that's important. But until then, the most important safety feature in my car is the driver. It's always enabled, especially when I take on the responsibility and don't depend on the tech to do it for me. The way I always have. But I do realize that this will vary by generation since the youngest drivers will grow up relying on the tech and will never develop the situational awareness, alertness, and care that the older generations did in all their years of driving.

Sorry to derail the thread. Guess I'm trying to say I'm not that concerned about a few psi.
 
Last edited:

Maverick2112

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Oct 18, 2021
Threads
14
Messages
171
Reaction score
328
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2025 xl hybrid.
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
Yeah, this sucks. I have some XLT wheels that I just put on my '25. This is the 4th Maverick they have been on and now I get the error message. When I pull into my garage next to the factory steel wheels, it resets, but then the next day on my commute I get the error again.
Sponsored

 
 







Top