- Joined
- Aug 28, 2023
- Threads
- 27
- Messages
- 572
- Reaction score
- 755
- Location
- Western Colorado
- Vehicle(s)
- 02 Ranger XLT 4L, Honda Valkyries (2)
- Engine
- 2.0L EcoBoost
- Thread starter
- #1
Those that live in CA are used to it....
Lets hopeI feel the prices will drop dramatically with the next election. IMO
Used to what? We have solar and overproduce currently. Plug-in Prius gets $0/mi on electric.Those that live in CA are used to it....
And places that cant even allow you to use your AC during the summer will never be able to keep up with EV demand.
I guess you miss where California says stop using your air-conditioning and charging your EV because their grade was too stressed on hot days during the summer pretty simple to understand that the US is definitely not ready with infrastructure for all the Evies that have to be plugged in and probably never will be all their requirements of going completely gassed free by 2035 is nothing more than posturing.Used to what? We have solar and overproduce currently. Plug-in Prius gets $0/mi on electric.
Our heat pumps are super efficient at heating and cooling too (not much needed, as we're near the coast).
This article is click-bait fearmongering with an agenda. Don't consider it "news", but more "opinion". Look at the url "OPINION" is right there!!!
Oh, and FFS LOL "Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF)" - gee lemme guess, I think they might be a bit pro oil and anti solar/ev. Have they ever considered how unprofitable Texas oil and gas companies would be without government subsidies? Kinda doubt they've done that study.
This thread is political BS and should be nuked. (now there's a green energy we can agree on, I hope )
Exactly.Misleading story and research. The EV per gallon equivalent is not comparable to what anyone pays at the pump. The study should have done a similar analysis on ICE vehicles that includes infrastructure cost, subsidies and bailouts to get an equivalent comparison. Without a valid comparison, the research is just hyperbole.
What about when all the gas stations run out of gas before a hurricane? Is that better?I guess you miss where California says stop using your air-conditioning and charging your EV because their grade was too stressed on hot days during the summer pretty simple to understand that the US is definitely not ready with infrastructure for all the Evies that have to be plugged in and probably never will be all their requirements of going completely gassed free by 2035 is nothing more than posturing.
I totally dumped know how stupid Texans were there that everybody should have a generator and a way to keep their house warm but overall I would definitely not go to California if I could ever avoid it everybody in their house should have a way to heat it that does not rely on the gridWhat about when all the gas stations run out of gas before a hurricane? Is that better?
The complete failure of Texas' grid leading to deaths - that wasn't due to EV/wind/solar.
But feel free to tout how bad CA is and how all the other states are better - we'll send people your way, but then you'll complain. Gotta make up your mind.
Bitcoin mining and marijuana grow ops use more power 24/7/365 than any air conditioner. Power companies will always sell you more power, they just don't want to invest in infrastructure they won't use and profit from, so they aren't going to build for peak needs but they will invest more as we start using more. Since the 70's they'd have George Burns ask you to give your appliances the afternoon off, but that's so they can max out profit while minimizing investment on infrastructure. As demand and household load increased they had to up service feeds and infrastructure since then and they made more in the long run. It just isn't instant or ever ahead of demand.I guess you miss where California says stop using your air-conditioning and charging your EV because their grade was too stressed on hot days during the summer pretty simple to understand
Well, that is true also but either way currently we have no way of meeting the demands and based on all the things are talking about EV's we're probably not going to be able to for the next hundred plus years. Also, I have a personal problem with the fact that we have energy companies that offer dividends to stockholders which means they're just also charging way too much to the average consumer but that's another discussion with record high electricity prices right now it's kind of me just trying to save every nickel I can, which is the only reason I bought Maverick.Bitcoin mining and marijuana grow ops use more power 24/7/365 than any air conditioner. Power companies will always sell you more power, they just don't want to invest in infrastructure they won't use and profit from, so they aren't going to build for peak needs but they will invest more as we start using more. Since the 70's they'd have George Burns ask you to give your appliances the afternoon off, but that's so they can max out profit while minimizing investment on infrastructure. As demand and household load increased they had to up service feeds and infrastructure since then and they made more in the long run. It just isn't instant or ever ahead of demand.