Not on a hybrid.I'd say 50,000 miles on a set of brakes is bragging rights!
This link by Professor Kelly, exactly explains how regenerative braking works!The motor doesn't need to change direction to switch from being propulsive to generating power. It's just a matter of whether the motor controller is providing current or not.
But, yes, since regenerative braking is done through the drivetrain and it's a FWD vehicle then that braking force is only applied on the front wheels. So the brake balance may be tuned to be slightly rear-biased, especially when crossing to utilizing the friction brakes, to offset the assist of the regen in the front.
Ah, regenerative braking.didnt know they lasted that long. Using the other gentleman's example of brakes lasting 210,000 miles,I drive roughly 10,000 miles a year. That means I wouldn't need new brakes on my vehicle for 21 years! Doesn't seem possible.Not on a hybrid.
Also, if you had the Hybrid and drove only 10k per year, your oil changes would probably be needed only once annually.Ah, regenerative braking. didnt know they lasted that long. Using the other gentleman's example of brakes lasting 210,000 miles,I drive roughly 10,000 miles a year. That means I wouldn't need new brakes on my vehicle for 21 years! Doesn't seem possible.
Yeah, good point, it is the electricity that changes direction, not the motor. I did know that but certainly didn't write it clearly.The motor doesn't need to change direction to switch from being propulsive to generating power. It's just a matter of whether the motor controller is providing current or not.
But, yes, since regenerative braking is done through the drivetrain and it's a FWD vehicle then that braking force is only applied on the front wheels. So the brake balance may be tuned to be slightly rear-biased, especially when crossing to utilizing the friction brakes, to offset the assist of the regen in the front.
Not disputing, but the rears on my '22 hybrid don't engage enough to keep the rotors swept clean.Talking with a tech yesterday. Newer Ford's have a rear brake bias especially in low speed light braking applications. Hybrid or ecoboost a lot of us can expect the rears to wear quicker.
50K brake replacement is not cause for bragging rights on any light vehicle. The Focus 5sp that the Mav replaced got new front brakes at 125K and rear at 200K.Not on a hybrid.
interesting. at 43k i was told i have 4/10 left on my rear pads and they will need to be done soon...Talking with a tech yesterday. Newer Ford's have a rear brake bias especially in low speed light braking applications. Hybrid or ecoboost a lot of us can expect the rears to wear quicker.
That's what my '12 Focus 5sp is getting too. I replaced the fronts at 130K miles, and still plenty left on the rears @150K.50K brake replacement is not cause for bragging rights on any light vehicle. The Focus 5sp that the Mav replaced got new front brakes at 125K and rear at 200K.
Jury is out on the Mav. Still looking good at 20K.
2007 hybrid Camry had 130k on original brakes & 12V battery when I traded it.I'd say 50,000 miles on a set of brakes is bragging rights!