The rear end in the Focus RS was a GKN "Twinster" unit and the one in the Tremor/Lobo is a Dana "AdvanTEK" product. They are similar technologies but different products from different manufacturers. I think this misconception started with some of the early reviews of the Tremor (and later Lobo) where the journalists pointed out the similarities to the unit in the RS and people started assuming it was the unit from the RS.It's the same gearbox, it just had 2nd gear disabled.
The clutch based limited slip isnt that crazy. There's 2 clutches, one for each rear axle, and the tremor can engage 1 or both to force power to one or both wheels "locking" the differential, or slip them for partial power delivery. The normal Mav has an open rear end and uses brake modulation to control wheel slip.
The Tremor also uses a water cooled PTU instead of an air cooled one to prevent overheating when off roading.
This is why the Lobo and Tremor can only tow 2k, that clutched rear end is great at performance on and off road, but it was built for the Focus RS, the clutches likely cant take the weight of a 4k trailer without constant slipping which would produce a bad driving experience at best or early failure at worst, compared to the open geared rear end of normal mavericks that can take the weight but cant direct power.
Even if, on paper, the two trucks are similar enough, the tremor is still only rater for 2k, and if the insurance finds you you were towing 4k with it, they can deny your coverage and leave you to the wolves.
Ford has also, to my knowledge, never stated why the Tremor and Lobo aren't available with the 4K tow rating. They both also have reduced payload compared to the other Mavericks, so I would be inclined to believe it has more to do with their unique suspensions and not necessarily that the rear end is somehow less capable.
Sponsored