No hybrid though, so only competes w/EB.
How’s the rear seat room in it compared to the Maverick?I swapped about a month ago. Both nice in their own way but not direct competitors
Better in my opinion and my teenage kids have said the same. Haven’t actually taken measurements or anything and obviously looks can be deceiving (like the Mav actually being bigger than the previous Ranger inside). When test driving, I set the drivers seat to my position and jump in the back and noticed more space between my knees and the seat. Frontier seats are also more comfortable to me
I actually looked hard at the Nissan Frontier, loved the front seats, V6 and interior dash (knobs & buttons). What I didn't like: rear bottom seat angle - caused leg fatigue and less leg room than the Maverick, style and look of the running boards, gas mileage but it is a V6. If the Frontier had a bit more leg room in the back and the seat angle was better supporting of your legs, I would have bought it. Specifically I was looking at the Pro4X. Have a Tremor on order.
That's interesting as all the reviews I have watched have said the rear seat room is not that great on the Frontier or Tacoma with the Ranger having the best. Though they say the Maverick beats them all.
im sure the improvement is marginal at best and it’s not like I spend any time back there so I don’t really pay that much attention to it. For sure better than new Tacoma, which I took a quick look at since it was next door. If my kids say it’s fine, that’s all I needed. At their age, they’re spending less and less time in my car anyway.
7150 lbs towing compared to 4000 lbs
Rear seat legroom on Maverick and Ridgeline are comparable. Unibody more space efficient. Tacoma, Frontier, Ranger are comparable, and all have less legroom than Maverick and Ridgeline.
