I did a road trip in a Flex last Saturday. Nice ride, but I can't get over the looks.
The Maverick is economical, practical, and it actually looks great.
The Maverick is economical, practical, and it actually looks great.
Sponsored
I never saw them as station wagons but then again I never sat in one either. They always seemed like another take on the mid sized SUV. Station wagons used to fill the niche now occupied by SUVs -having a lot of internal volume has always been desirable.Because station wagons are awesome. Especially when available with AWD and twin turbos.
My dad had 2 of em. He traded up the second time to platinum because he got a deal. They were great family haulers and could tow a light camper. Had good tech and lots of luxury for their time.
Crazy you say that but I too have been thinking the same thing!!
I test drove and ordered a Maverick while my wife was out of town. She finally got to test drive one last weekend, and said it was like her Flex she used to have. I first thought “No, it’s not.” But it pretty much is a Flex with a bed.![]()
Ford Flex Dimensions
202″ L x 76″ W x 68″ H
Ford Maverick Dimensions
200″ L x 73″ W x 69″ H
The Flex was a "station wagon" pure and simple. However those two words--"station wagon" were anathema to the auto industry. I had a new Flex nearly every year it was manufactured, except one year when they would not let us order one.What was the flex all about? I could never figure out why it even existed.
My brother owned one and liked it for it's usefulness but he always called it the fridge.If you can get past the looks, vehicles of that style and minivans might be the most practical consumer vehicles on the road. There's not much you can't do in one. Outside of towing and off-roading, more practical than most trucks and SUVs
Sure, just like CVPIs were finished in a secretive part of the factory requiring special badged security and have the superchargers removed before they could be liquidated to civilians.The ones sold to LE had a turbo 5.0 in them. Us peasants weren’t allowed to order them with those in it though.
Well they were built on the Taurus chassis. And they had 4 doors and a seat that folded down in the back for a 3rd row. They were also low to the ground making no intention of being a SUVish utility vehicle like crossovers and such. Also long flat low body lines. That screams station wagon to me.I never saw them as station wagons but then again I never sat in one either. They always seemed like another take on the mid sized SUV. Station wagons used to fill the niche now occupied by SUVs -having a lot of internal volume has always been desirable.
Didn't know they had twin turbos either. Maybe they were trying to capture the magic of that muscle wagon chrysler used to make - what was that thing called, the magnum?