- Joined
- Mar 16, 2025
- Threads
- 10
- Messages
- 119
- Reaction score
- 270
- Location
- Eastern Oregon
- Vehicle(s)
- '24 Ford Ranger XLT FX4
- Engine
- 2.0L EcoBoost
- Thread starter
- #1
Looking at swapping the factory tires on my Mav with something a bit beefier. I'm looking at going up to 245/65R17 from the factory 225/65R17. I'm considering a pair of AT tires (either the Vredestein Pinza or Maxxis Razr) but I've read that I can expect a 1-3mpg decrease by switching to AT tires. Would the loss of MPG be spared at all by going with AS tire instead? I know a bigger tire will always result in worse MPG, but I'm wanting to minimize that MPG loss as much as possible. My truck lives 90% of its life on paved roads and the remaining 10% is gravel or dirt roads when I'm going shooting, camping, fishing, etc. I don't truly take it off roading so AT tires would more of an aesthetic rather than functional thing for me.
Just wondering if anybody knows how different AS and AT tires perform in terms of MPG? If the difference is small enough then I may say MPG be damned and get the AT tires for looks. I can't deny that Mavericks with AT tires look good, but they really aren't practical for my day to day use if I'm going to tank my MPG by doing so.
Just wondering if anybody knows how different AS and AT tires perform in terms of MPG? If the difference is small enough then I may say MPG be damned and get the AT tires for looks. I can't deny that Mavericks with AT tires look good, but they really aren't practical for my day to day use if I'm going to tank my MPG by doing so.
Sponsored