Sponsored

JASmith

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Jessica
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Threads
68
Messages
1,597
Reaction score
3,743
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Dodge Ram 1500
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Actual CR reader feedback on the Bronco Sport for Reliability is 5 out of 5. I suspect CR was taking that result into account for the Maverick Reliability estimate, as the Bronco Sport and Maverick are built on the same line in the same plant.
Reliability is one of their strongest weighted factors and what they are known for, and it should be as owning an unreliable vehicle just isn't fun.

That said, this early in the game they are purely guessing. Unlike the Maverick, the platform that the Santa Cruz is based on is all new as is the engine and transmission, so there's just not enough data yet, but perhaps because of that they are expecting more teething problems with the Hyundai so err on the side of caution.

The Maverick on the other hand is more of a known quantity because the Ecoboost has been around forever, the transmission we know at least since 2020, the infotainment is Sync 3 (or decontented version of it in lower trims) dates all the way back to 2015 IIRC, and as mentioned the Bronco Sport sister vehicle has done well recently boosting their confidence that its going to be much more sorted out its first year.

That said, it also shows that the SC really isn't a slouch otherwise, since the road test and fuel economy are very much on par with 78 vs 77 and 23 vs 24 mpg for the Mav and SC respectively. And for those curious, here is how other midsize trucks scored, first number being road test and second being combined fuel economy:
Ford Maverick Consumer Reports Maverick XLT AWD Review Capture.JPG


For those curious why the Ridgeline got a higher "road-test" score than the Mav or Santa Cruz, note that its not just track acceleration, braking, and emergency maneuver performance where its likely both would outperform the Ridgeline but ride-quality and noise and the Ridgeline is notoriously quiet and squishy.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
OP
OP
davnau

davnau

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Jul 29, 2021
Threads
6
Messages
206
Reaction score
370
Location
Barberton, OH, US
Vehicle(s)
'73 Ford Mustang
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Reliability is one of their strongest weighted factors and what they are known for, and it should be as owning an unreliable vehicle just isn't fun.

That said, this early in the game they are purely guessing. Unlike the Maverick, the platform that the Santa Cruz is based on is all new as is the engine and transmission, so there's just not enough data yet, but perhaps because of that they are expecting more teething problems with the Hyundai so err on the side of caution.

The Maverick on the other hand is more of a known quantity because the Ecoboost has been around forever, the transmission we know at least since 2020, the infotainment is Sync 3 (or decontented version of it in lower trims) dates all the way back to 2015 IIRC, and as mentioned the Bronco Sport sister vehicle has done well recently boosting their confidence that its going to be much more sorted out its first year.

That said, it also shows that the SC really isn't a slouch otherwise, since the road test and fuel economy are very much on par with 77 vs 78 and 23 vs 24 mpg for the Mav and SC respectively. And for those curious, here is how other midsize trucks scored, first number being road test and second being combined fuel economy:
Capture.JPG


For those curious why the Ridgeline got a higher "road-test" score than the Mav or Santa Cruz, note that its not just track acceleration, braking, and emergency maneuver performance where its likely both would outperform the Ridgeline but ride-quality and noise and the Ridgeline is notoriously quiet and squishy.
That's a great summary. Consumer Reports testing is just another data point to consider. I've been subscribing for over 40 years, with online-only for the last ten or so.

I think the Hybrid will get a very good overall score too, when testing is completed.

I ordered my Maverick because it was just an unbelievable combination in size, MPG, overall capability, and then the fantastic price. I ordered an XL Hybrid with only a trailer hitch option back on June 17, 2021. I never change the side mirror positions once set (I'm single) and I've hardly ever used cruise control on previous vehicles, except when driving out west, so the base XL fits my needs just about perfectly. Scheduled for production week of May 9. The CR test is just another confirmation of what I expect to get once it finally arrives. It's not perfect, but in my opinion, just a tremendous value.

I like Hondas, have owned three over the years, but at almost twice the price, not really worth it, For the price of the Ridgeline, I bought a small pontoon boat the Maverick will pull, plus ordered the Maverick. Together, they equal the price of a well-equipped Ridgeline. I'd rather have the small pontoon boat AND a basic smaller truck for the same money. (Boat, motor, and trailer, with gear and fuel, is 1850 pounds.)

The Volvo C70 retractable-hardtop convertible I have now (and rated for 2000 pounds towing) will be replaced with the Maverick Hybrid. Also selling my Toyota Paseo convertible. My old 1973 Mustang will be it for top-down driving. Amazingly, the Maverick Hybrid will be the fastest vehicle I've ever owned. (The Mustang has the 250 Six, so nothing fast there.) For those interested, the C70 was designed when Ford owned Volvo, and uses the C1 (Ford Focus/Mazda3) platform. I call it the world's fanciest Focus.

Ford Maverick Consumer Reports Maverick XLT AWD Review 1650604088154
 
Last edited:

Aonarch

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
9
Reaction score
11
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Bronco
Ford Maverick Consumer Reports Maverick XLT AWD Review Screenshot_20220422-081921_Chrome


The Ridgeline is in-between a midsize and a full-size.

Meanwhile the Ranger, which I own and love, is a mid-size truck.

The compact list also includes all of the other mid-size trucks (Tacoma, Colorado, Frontier, etc).

CR needs to fix their compact comparison.
 

Mainer500

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Lou
Joined
Aug 4, 2021
Threads
22
Messages
431
Reaction score
449
Location
Maine
Vehicle(s)
2018 F-150 STX, 2016 Ford Fiesta SE
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Finally posted with test results, with Road Test Score of 78 out of 100, an Overall Score of 74 out of 100 and RECOMMENDED:

https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/ford/maverick/2022/overview/

To see the whole detail, you may need to be a Consumer Reports subscriber.

Tested MPG was: Overall 23 / City 16 / Hwy 32 mpg

Rated well ahead overall of the Santa Cruz. I thought it was a decent test/review.

CU had announced earlier that a Hybrid test will come later.

NOTE: It just disappeared, showing still "IN TEST". CU must be in the process of posting it, but not completely done yet.
So I finally watched the video of the three consumers report guys and, in my opinion, that’s 21 minutes and 13 seconds of my life that I can’t get back. I don’t want to call them pompous asses because that would be an insult to the other pompous asses like them. Couldn’t disagree more with their review. Now I remember why I canceled my subscription from them years ago, they hate American Car Manufacturers (yes I know the Maverick is built in Mexico but it’s still an American company for now). My Wife loves her Maverick it has 4k miles on it and for 30 grand it’s a Best Buy in today’s world.
 

Akuma72387

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Shaun
Joined
Oct 19, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
264
Reaction score
210
Location
04920
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick XLT
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I'm sorry but CR had to have been doing something stupid to get gas milage that low. If I beat on my truck and speed well above what I should be I still get over 24mpg I normally average 29-31 in mine with 14k miles and between 430 to 470 miles on a tank
 

Sponsored

JASmith

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Jessica
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Threads
68
Messages
1,597
Reaction score
3,743
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Dodge Ram 1500
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I'm sorry but CR had to have been doing something stupid to get gas milage that low. If I beat on my truck and speed well above what I should be I still get over 24mpg I normally average 29-31 in mine with 14k miles and between 430 to 470 miles on a tank
It really doesn't matter what they do IMO, as long as they do it the same when testing every vehicle. Obviously individual driver habits and driving terrain will vary wildly from a mile above sea level going up and down mountains at freezing temps to someone living on the flat coastline nice and toasty.

So I take it nobody has a paid subscription that can screenshot the whole thing for us? :(
 

Beast_31

2.0L EcoBoost
Active member
First Name
Beast31
Joined
Apr 6, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
34
Reaction score
54
Location
Long Island
Vehicle(s)
2022 XLT AWD Carbonized Grey,
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
CR's observed MPG is much closer to my own experience than most of the other reviews I've seen.
I have to drive v-e-r-y conservatively to get close to 20 MPG in all-city driving in my AWD EB. Conversely, my highway MPG has been in the low 30s without much effort. I know that mileage suffers at highway speeds over about 70. I rarely drive over 65-70.
Yeah, I got about 2,100mi and avg 19mpg. Vast majority city driving in Normal mode, 87 octane.
 

Jville

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Gary
Joined
Apr 6, 2022
Threads
7
Messages
161
Reaction score
114
Location
Jacksonville
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Ecoboost awd
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I'm sorry but CR had to have been doing something stupid to get gas milage that low. If I beat on my truck and speed well above what I should be I still get over 24mpg I normally average 29-31 in mine with 14k miles and between 430 to 470 miles on a tank
Note that you should avoid lugging the 2.0 to minimize carbon accumulation which leads to potential dieseling and other problems. This is one case where spirited driving, within reason, trumps sauntering along.
 

mr mojo risen

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Threads
12
Messages
545
Reaction score
723
Location
Evansville IN
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick, 2020 VW Passat, 2015 Nissan Sentra
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
It really doesn't matter what they do IMO, as long as they do it the same when testing every vehicle. Obviously individual driver habits and driving terrain will vary wildly from a mile above sea level going up and down mountains at freezing temps to someone living on the flat coastline nice and toasty.

So I take it nobody has a paid subscription that can screenshot the whole thing for us? :(
I have a paid subscription to CR…. but to screenshot everything they have published on the Maverick is a pretty big ask….. Might take 15-20+ screenshots. Let me try and see what I can do….. I notice some posters have already posted some of the info already.
 

mr mojo risen

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Threads
12
Messages
545
Reaction score
723
Location
Evansville IN
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick, 2020 VW Passat, 2015 Nissan Sentra
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Here is the text of the Road Test Report…. (Warning - Long)

The Maverick is a new small pickup based on Ford’s Bronco Sport and Escape SUVs. Starting at just under $20,000, it occupies an increasingly popular niche—a small truck that can be bought on a budget. With a civilized ride, handy maneuverability, easy access, and decent fuel efficiency, the Maverick outscores every pickup in its class, other than the larger and more expensive Honda Ridgeline.

The Maverick is better-suited to most “truck stuff”—whether for work or play—than the similarly-sized Hyundai Santa Cruz. For instance, the Ford’s 4.5-foot-long bed has about one-and-a-half times the volume of the little Hyundai’s, and the bed’s low height makes it easy to load. The tailgate can be positioned at an upward angle which, in conjunction with the tops of the rear wheel wells and ratchet straps, makes it possible to carry standard 4x8 sheets of plywood. Owners are also likely to appreciate the handy sliding tie-down rings and in-bed lighting. One “truck stuff” area where the Santa Cruz is superior is towing: When properly equipped the Hyundai has the ability to tow a trailer of up to 5,000 pounds, whereas the Ford is limited to 4,000 pounds.

The Maverick’s standard powertrain is a hybrid (which we’re also testing), employing the same hardware as the Escape hybrid with a 191-horsepower, 2.5-liter four-cylinder with electric drive linked to a continuously variable transmission (CVT) and front-wheel drive.

For now, we’ve tested an XLT with the 250-hp, 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder that comes mated to an eight-speed automatic transmission. The engine is well-matched to the Maverick’s weight, with just-robust-enough power for most driving situations, though it can sound wheezy and uninspiring. Its 0 to 60 mph time of 7.1 seconds is competitive with other small-to-midsized trucks; it isn’t quite as quick as the speedy Santa Cruz, but it’s a hair quicker than the Ridgeline. Our tested all-wheel-drive model managed 23 mpg overall on regular fuel.

The ride is firm, but it’s less unruly when driving on bumpy roads than most pickups. And although the Maverick doesn’t turn into corners with quite the verve of the Santa Cruz, it proved utterly secure and confidence-inspiring around our test track. The compact dimensions make it adept in parking maneuvers and outward visibility is quite good. It also turned in short, consistent stopping distances.

Refinement was clearly not a high priority for the Maverick. It can get pretty loud inside the cabin, due to a combination of engine and wind noise, especially on the highway. The engine’s tendency to lug along at low revs can send uncouth vibrations into the cabin, which gets annoying. The utilitarian interior is full of cheap-feeling plastic pieces, which isn’t surprising given its price. The controls, including the infotainment screen and the climate system’s large knobs and physical buttons, are a breeze to use.

Unlike most pickups, it’s easy to get in and out of the Maverick due to its low floor height. The front seatbacks are well-bolstered, but thigh support is lacking. Available only as a crew cab, the rear seat has plenty of headroom, but legroom is tight for taller passengers, and the upright seatback can get uncomfortable on long trips.

Forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking with pedestrian detection come standard, but important active safety features such as blind spot warning and rear cross traffic warning are optional across all trims, instead of standard. Lane departure warning and lane keeping assistance are also optional. Adaptive cruise control and lane centering assistance are only optionally available on the top Lariat trim.

Best Version to Get

The hybrid is the best way to maximize fuel economy, but its usefulness is limited in snowy regions since it’s only available with front-wheel drive. The optional turbo engine is the way to go for buyers looking for more power and all-wheel-drive traction. Regardless, we’d opt for the XLT trim equipped with the Luxury package, as it includes a power driver’s seat and a bedliner. The Ford Co-Pilot360 is a worthwhile option as it brings blind spot warning and rear cross traffic warning.

Notable changes:

The Maverick is an all-new model for 2022, based on Ford’s Bronco Sport and Escape small SUVs.

Performance:
Drivetrain

The optional 250-horsepower, 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder is well-matched to the size and weight of the Maverick. It gets off the line without hesitation, and provides decent mid-range thrust. We found that there’s just-robust-enough power for most driving situations, though it doesn’t have the power reserves of the Santa Cruz with its optional turbo engine. The Maverick’s engine can also sound wheezy and uninspiring.

The eight-speed automatic upshifts smoothly, and downshifts come in a timely and mostly smooth fashion. But there are certain situations, especially on secondary roads when driving at around 30-40 mph, that the transmission shifts into too tall of a gear, causing the engine to lug in an unrefined fashion which sends vibrations into the cabin. A minor press on the gas pedal usually brings a quick downshift, but it can still be a bit annoying.

Its 0 to 60 mph time of 7.1 seconds is competitive with other small-to-midsized trucks; it isn’t quite as quick as the speedy Santa Cruz, but it’s a hair quicker than the larger Ford Ranger, Honda Ridgeline, and Nissan Frontier.

Our tested all-wheel-drive model managed 23 mpg overall on regular fuel. That’s notably more frugal than any other traditional pickup truck, and just 1-mpg shy of the slightly smaller Santa Cruz with its optional turbo engine. The Maverick’s stop/start system, which is designed to save fuel by shutting off the engine at stoplights, is nearly seamless, firing the engine back up super-quickly as soon as you take your foot off the brake pedal to get moving again.

Handling

The Maverick is a competent little vehicle to drive around. It doesn’t turn into corners with quite the eagerness of the Santa Cruz, but there’s a responsiveness and tautness to it that our drivers appreciated.

Agility is a bit diminished compared to the Bronco Sport and Escape small SUVs it’s derived from, but it’s still head and shoulders above any traditional body-on-frame pickup when it comes to taking corners with verve. The Maverick’s steering has a natural heft to it (without feeling excessively heavy, such as in the Frontier) and it gives the driver a small amount of feedback about front-tire grip and road texture, which we appreciate. Good resistance to body lean through turns, a well-tuned electronic stability control (ESC) system, and the keen ability of the all-wheel-drive system to put the power down to all four tires exiting turns helped make the Maverick secure and confidence-inspiring around our track. Our testers said it was easy to drive the truck through CR’s avoidance maneuver—a test which simulates swerving quickly, with a left-right-left steering sequence. And the Maverick’s speed of 52.5 mph through the exercise is quite good for a pickup truck.

The little Ford instilled confidence when pushed hard around our twisty road-course track, with the front tires always losing traction well before the rear tires, which is a steady and safe attitude. The chassis was somewhat responsive to changes in throttle to curb the front-tire push, with small amounts of easy-to-control oversteer (which is when the rear tires lose grip, and step out slightly) induced, but the truck is far from sporty or fun to drive at its limits.

Ride comfort

The Maverick’s ride benefits from its car-based unibody construction, as opposed to the more rugged body-on-frame setup of traditional pickups. The ride is firm, but it gets less unruly over big bumps than most pickups. Some impacts, particularly at lower speeds, come through into the cabin, and there is some bounciness or abruptness to the ride at times, but within the world of pickups, the Maverick delivers one of the most civilized rides. We noticed occasional suspension noise when encountering harder-edged bumps, such as potholes, which make the Maverick feel a bit unrefined.

Noise

Although road and tire noise are kept at acceptable levels inside the Maverick, elevated wind noise along with an engine that one tester described as “sounding like a turbocharged blender under the hood” make for a fairly loud experience on the highway. In fairness, the engine rarely gets boisterous, even during hard acceleration, it just has an industrial-like wheezy character that’s uninspiring. It also doesn’t help that the Maverick’s transmission logic often results in early upshifts, which causes the engine to “lug” at low revs, resulting in a vibration felt through the cabin. Wind noise on the highway creeps in mostly around the windshield pillars and from the side mirrors, and ambient air noise from the rear-seat area means occupants have to raise their voices to be heard. Of note, the top-trim Lariat models come with an acoustic windshield that likely cuts down on wind noise.

Braking

The Maverick turned in an excellent braking performance, managing short stops on both dry and wet surfaces. Stopping distances were consistent and the truck was very stable during these panic-brake tests. Out on the road, our drivers found the brake pedal easy to modulate, allowing you to stop exactly where you intended with minimal effort.

Driver assistance

Our Maverick was not equipped with an active driving assistance system, which is the combination of adaptive cruise control (ACC) and lane centering assistance (LCA). ACC is only optionally available on the top Lariat trim line.
Lane departure warning (LDW) and lane keeping assistance (LKA) come as part of the optional Ford Co-Pilot360 package. The LDW system warns the driver that the Maverick is crossing over a lane line by giving a visual alert and vibrating the steering wheel. The LKA system comes with two stages of warnings -- an orange warning within the instrument cluster with a light nudge of the steering wheel when close to the lane line, followed by a red warning within the instrument cluster and a stronger nudge of the steering wheel when on top of the lane line.

Headlights

We rated the Maverick’s LED headlights, which come standard on all trims, as only doing a “fair” job overall, the score limited mainly by the lack of low-beam illumination. As with most LED systems, the headlights provide a high level of intensity with a very white and bright light.
The low beams provide only “fair” levels of light straight ahead down the road. They don’t give enough light for the driver to adequately see, react, and brake for anything ahead when speeds reach about 60 mph. Sideward visibility was rated at “good,” which is lower than the levels of sideward visibility we typically see with better-performing LED headlights. Sideward visibility can help drivers see pedestrians and wildlife entering from the sides of the road, or in navigating corners.

In contrast, the high beams do a “very good” job of lighting the road ahead, although the distance is shorter than what most high beams achieve. Automatic high beams (which Ford refers to as “Auto Hi-Beam”) come standard across all Maverick trims. This system can help drivers take advantage of the additional visibility that high beams bring more frequently, as it automatically switches the high beams on anytime traffic and conditions allow—an especially important feature given the Maverick’s lack of low-beam visibility. We found that the system appropriately changed back and forth between low and high beams, but the automatic high beams have to be turned on by going through a setting within the instrument cluster, forcing extra searching for what should be a simple task, such as the press of a button on the dashboard.

The top Lariat trims also include wiper-activated headlights, a smart feature that assures the Maverick’s headlights are on in rainy weather, even if it's not nighttime.

Towing

The Maverick with the optional turbo four-cylinder and all-wheel drive can tow up to 4,000 pounds, when equipped with the 4K Tow package which adds a transmission oil cooler, a higher-capacity radiator, an upgraded cooling fan, shorter gearing, and a trailer brake controller. For comparison, the Hyundai Santa Cruz has the ability to tow a trailer of up to 5,000 pounds.
Since our tested Maverick wasn’t equipped with the towing package, our truck is only rated to tow 2,000 pounds, despite having the optional turbocharged engine and all-wheel drive. The hybrid version, which comes only with front-wheel drive, has a maximum tow rating of 2,000 pounds.

Off-road

Unlike most midsized pickups—and all full-sized trucks—that use a more sturdy body-on-frame construction and have robust four-wheel-drive systems, the Maverick isn’t intended for serious off-road duty. As such, we didn’t attempt to take our all-wheel-drive XLT up the Auto Test Center’s challenging Rock Hill. The Maverick has only modest ground clearance and long overhangs that would likely result in damaged body panels or other mechanical components. An FX4 off-road package is available that adds skid plates, all-terrain tires, and additional off-road-oriented drive modes, but the Maverick’s “off-road experience” is better suited to gravel roads, mild dirt trails, and other slippery surfaces.
Comfort & Convenience

Interior fit and finish

The Maverick’s utilitarian interior is full of cheap, hollow-sounding plastic pieces, which isn’t surprising given its fairly low starting price. In truth, most pickups—even full-sized models—have lots of plastic panels compared with cars, and Ford did a good job of at least making the Maverick look unique, with items such as exposed screws on the door pulls and an interesting mix of colors and materials. We also appreciated the leather-wrapped steering wheel which comes as part of the XLT Luxury package; a urethane steering wheel comes standard on the base XL and XLT.

Most of the controls have a solid feel to them, but the climate control’s fan-speed and temperature knobs have mushy, undefined detents, which makes it too easy to turn the knob further than intended. We did find a fair amount of rough edges on the plastic panels here and there, and the instrument cluster shroud is pretty flimsy and poorly attached. The cloth seats in our XLT test model have a rather scratchy feel to them.

Driving position

The Maverick’s driving position is similar to the Bronco Sport upon which it is based, which means it has an upright feel with a slightly elevated and commanding view of the road ahead. Headroom and space around the driver is plentiful, but the inability to independently tilt the leading edge of the bottom cushion made for a compromised position for some drivers. The center console is very low (more so than the Bronco Sport), which avoids right-knee intrusion issues for most drivers. The door- and center armrests are well-placed, but there isn’t enough padding on the door to give good elbow comfort for long drives. The steering column has adequate tilt and telescope range. While the left footrest is tall enough for large feet, it’s on the narrow side.

Visibility

The Maverick’s boxy pickup shape yields good outward visibility for the most part. The windshield is large and the view over the hood is aided by the flat, low dashboard. The windshield pillars get thick toward the base and, together with the side mirrors, form a good-sized blind spot that the driver has to peer around to see pedestrians and other vehicles when navigating intersections. The side windows are nice and tall, but the thick side pillars hamper over-the-shoulder views when changing lanes. The rear window in our tested XLT is a clean pane of glass, free of the sliding rear window bars that obstruct the views out the back of most pickups. The rear-seat headrests block the outer edges of the window, and they can’t be folded down when the seat isn’t in use.

Seat comfort and access

The XLT’s front seats are fairly basic and proved only marginally comfortable for most drivers. While the seatback is well-bolstered, and we appreciate that the eight-way power-adjustable driver’s seat in our XLT with the Luxury package has two-way lumbar, the bottom cushion is short, a bit narrow, and flat. As such, there’s only minimal thigh support, which compromises comfort on longer drives. The front passenger seat has six-way manual adjustments. The top Lariat trim offers the same level of cushion adjustments, only adding four-way head restraints.

Available only as a crew cab, the Maverick’s rear seat is good-sized considering how small the vehicle is, making it usable for kids, or adults on shorter trips. There’s plenty of headroom and foot space underneath the front seats, and the angled-back bottom cushion gives good thigh support. But legroom is tight for taller passengers, and the upright seatback—the angle of which can’t be adjusted—can get uncomfortable on long trips. We do appreciate that padded door armrests made their way into the second row. Unlike most pickups, it’s easy to get in and out of the Maverick due to its low floor height. The front seats are positioned at around hip height for most adults and combined with tall doors with wide openings this makes it easy to slide right into the seat. Shorter-legged occupants might brush a pants leg on the rocker panel getting back out. It’s pretty easy to get in and out of the rear seat, too, with the biggest obstacle being the tight knee space due to the close proximity of the front seats. The door openings are also a bit narrower but the seat cushion is, again, an easy height to slide over and onto.

Usability

Most of the Maverick’s controls are basic but functional and easy to use. This includes the infotainment touch screen as well as the climate system’s large knobs and physical buttons. The media controls are split between the left and right sides of the steering wheel, causing some searching for functions while driving. The instrument cluster is basic, but also easy to use.
The climate system’s “mode man” allows for individual adjustment of the air flow, making it easy to distinguish between the head, feet, etc. without needing a menu screen. Having three fan speeds to choose from for “Auto” mode was appreciated by testers.

We did have a few relatively minor quibbles. For instance, the headlight dial is blocked by the left side of the steering wheel, and the automatic high beams have to be turned on by going through a setting within the instrument cluster, forcing extra searching for what should be a simple task, such as pressing a button on the dashboard. The button to activate the hazard lights—located in the middle of the media controls on the center stack—is too small, making it difficult to find quickly. Also, the inner door pull’s open-hook setup requires that front occupants grab a very specific location to close the door, and it can catch purse handles and keychains when entering the vehicle.

Infotainment

The Maverick uses a simplified version of Ford’s familiar and easy-to-use Sync 3 infotainment system. The full version of Sync 3 is optional on the top Lariat trim, and that is the only way to get SiriusXM satellite radio. The system is logically organized and simple to navigate, aided by large fonts and buttons. Most vehicle settings are accessed within the touch screen but there’s minimal available customization of the system itself; for example, you can’t rearrange the menu icons as you can with some systems. The screen isn’t tilted toward the driver, which gives both the driver and passenger equal access. But, it’s positioned in a completely vertical fashion, which can be awkward for those who prefer to have a perch for their wrist while interacting with the screen. The system can be slow to respond at times, but most functions have redundant physical controls and the climate system is completely separate, which limits frustration. There doesn’t appear to be an anti-glare coating on the screen, and as such we found that it can get washed out and become very difficult to read in bright, direct sunlight.

Phone

Pairing Bluetooth devices is simple and wired Android Auto and Apple CarPlay compatibility come standard on all trims. Initiating phone calls can be done through the instrument cluster by using the steering-wheel controls (rather than having to go through the infotainment screen), which means you can keep your hands on the wheel. But it does require a few steps to navigate to the phone menu, instead of simply pressing a dedicated phone button. Wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay are not available. A wireless charger is only optional on the top Lariat trim.

Connectivity

Every Maverick is compatible with the free FordPass app that allows you to lock/unlock, locate, and start your vehicle. We like that these remote functions do not cost extra as they do with many other vehicles. The FordPass app ran well on our iPhone, and connected reliably to the vehicle. The remote-start and door-lock controls are presented on the first page of the app when you open it, but there are a lot of other features and menus that can take time to sort through and learn. All Mavericks come with USB Type-A and Type-C ports up front. Lariat trims get additional rear-seat USB ports.

Climate features

The XLT comes with a single-zone automatic climate system; buyers need to step up to the top Lariat trim to get a dual-zone setup. Our test truck was equipped with the optional XLT Luxury package, which includes heat for the front seats, steering wheel, and side mirrors. We appreciate that the climate controls are physical buttons and knobs, rather than of the touch-screen variety—this makes for a more precise and consistent action. The remote-start system pre-conditions the cabin, triggering the heated seats and steering wheel—both of which get very warm very quickly.

Cabin storage

Front passengers get several open bins in the center console, as well as a deep covered storage bin under the padded armrest between the seats. Most of the bins have a grippy rubber padding, which helps keep items from sliding around. The door pockets are extremely shallow, which is surprising for a utilitarian vehicle such as a pickup—you’d be hard-pressed to stash much more than a pair of thick winter gloves in there, and we’d worry about them falling out when you open the door. There’s also a storage pocket behind the front passenger seat, but there isn’t one behind the driver. Like many trucks, the Maverick has large storage bins underneath the rear seats.

Cup holders

Front passengers get two cup holders located next to the gear selector dial on the center console, each with grippy rubber bases and plastic anti-tip measures to help hold drinks in place. Rear-seat occupants have two cup holders nestled into the fold-down center armrest. All four doors include built-in bottle holders.

Cargo area

Considering that the Maverick’s bed is only 4.5-feet long—a foot shorter than the smallest bed available on the full-sized F-150—the total volume, at 26 cubic-feet, is good-sized and fairly useful. For comparison, that’s about one-and-a-half times the cubic-volume of the Hyundai Santa Cruz’s 4-foot-long bed.

The Maverick’s low bed height makes it easy to load, especially compared to full-sized pickups and most traditional midsized trucks. For example, the side rails are low enough that you can access the bed by reaching over them. There are handy sliding tie-down rings that let you adjust your anchor points, and an attempt was made to extract more usefulness from the bed’s dimensions with molded-in pockets designed to fit typical 2x4 and 2x6 boards, enabling the bed to be partitioned in various configurations to suit your storage needs. There’s also a bed light and a 120-volt outlet.

The tailgate can be positioned at an upward angle which, in conjunction with the tops of the rear wheel wells and ratchet straps, makes it possible to carry standard 4x8 sheets of plywood. But alas, the tailgate doesn’t have a damped opening, unlike most trucks these days, but at least it’s very light and easy to lift up.

Spare tire

A temporary spare tire is standard. A full-size spare is optional on all trims.
Driver Assist Systems & Crash Protection
Crash-test results
Neither the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) nor the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) have crash-tested the Maverick yet.

Crash-avoidance systems

Standard active safety features on the Maverick include forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking with pedestrian detection. Blind spot warning and rear cross traffic warning are optional as part of the Ford Co-Pilot360 package.

Forward collision warning (FCW) and automatic emergency braking (AEB) with pedestrian detection -- These systems monitor for vehicles and pedestrians ahead, and are designed to reduce the likelihood and/or severity of frontal crashes. FCW and AEB—which Ford refers to as “Pre-Collision Assist”—recognize vehicles ahead when the Maverick is traveling between 3 to 75 mph. The FCW will alert the driver with audible and visual warnings if the system senses a potential collision. The AEB will be initiated if the driver fails to react to the system’s warnings in time to help mitigate the anticipated crash. The pedestrian detection system is active between 3 to 50 mph.

Blind spot warning (BSW) -- If another vehicle is traveling in a lane beside the Maverick, potentially hidden in a blind spot, the BSW system lights up a small yellow icon in the corresponding side mirror to warn of a vehicle in an adjacent lane. The icon will flash quickly if the driver starts to move over into an already-occupied lane.

Rear cross traffic warning (RCTW) -- When in Reverse, this system scans for vehicles approaching from behind the Maverick and will give audible and visual warnings to help get the driver’s attention. The BSW icons will light up in the side mirrors, and an arrow will appear in the backup camera screen pointing to the direction the vehicle is approaching from. This is a very handy feature when backing out of a tight parking space, or when reversing from a blind driveway out onto a busy road.

Crash notification

There isn’t a built-in modem to enable SOS functionality, like there is in many other vehicles. Automatic Collision Notification (911 Assist, as Ford calls it) requires an active Bluetooth phone connection, which is generally less reliable than an integrated system. However, unlike many competitors, Ford doesn’t charge extra for this feature. We like that a pop-up on the center infotainment screen asks if you would like to enable it when you pair your device, something we recommend all Maverick owners do.

Rollaway risk

The Maverick’s electronic rotary gear selector dial meets CR’s rollaway-risk requirements. If the driver fails to select Park and the vehicle is left in Reverse or Drive when the ignition is turned off, or the driver’s door is opened, the transmission will automatically shift into Park.

Child safety

Overall, car seats were mostly easy to secure with the vehicle belt, with the exception of some infant seats. Lower anchors are available in the outboard seats and center-seat lower-anchor borrowing is allowed if the car-seat manufacturer allows for non-standard lower anchor spacing. Tether attachment is a bit cumbersome but not impossible. Three car seats will fit across this rear seat.

Lower anchors are available and exposed at the seat crease in the outboard seats. They are close to the seat cushion and a little deep, so you may need to twist to remove the connectors. Center LATCH installations are allowed by Ford by borrowing the inboard lower anchors if the car seat manufacturer also allows for LATCH installation with non-standard spacing.
Tether anchors are exposed behind the seat on the back wall of the truck, which makes it difficult to fully tighten the tether. The tether should be routed under the outboard head restraint. The Maverick owner’s manual says the tether should be routed over the head restraint in the center seat, but a spokesperson from Ford told CR that the tether can be routed under a raised center head restraint.

It’s hard to balance a child seat on the vehicle seat while trying to attach to the tether anchor behind the seatback, with the seatback folded forward. Also, the tether has to be twisted to get the hook into the proper orientation illustrated by the Maverick owner’s manual, but it’s important to note that for proper child-passenger safety, the tether strap should not be twisted. It’s also difficult to get the rear seat latched against the back wall after tether attachment.
Some infant seat designs could not be installed securely with the vehicle belt in the rear seat because of the tall, floppy buckles and wide belt-anchor spacing. Others can be securely installed with some extra effort.

Rear-facing convertibles were easy to install with the vehicle belt in all rear seating positions.
Forward-facing car seats were easy to secure with the vehicle belt in the rear seats.

Booster use

The rear head restraints will need to be removed to accommodate a highback booster. Boosters fit on the second-row outboard seat and sit stably. The outboard buckle recesses a little as you try to buckle it, which may make it a bit more challenging for a kid to do on their own.

In the rear center seat, a booster may have to be shifted a little towards the left outboard seat to access the center buckle, but not enough to prevent a left outboard occupant. Two hands are needed to buckle in the rear center seat.

Rear occupant alert

The Maverick lacks Ford’s end-of-trip alert system that reminds drivers to check the rear seat for occupants—it comes standard on other models, such as the Bronco Sport. That’s an oversight, because this rear-door-logic system could help prevent kids and pets from dying when left in hot cars.

Rear head restraints

The rear center head restraint needs to be raised for safe usage. The outboard head restraints are tall enough for adults and kids to use safely.

Rear belt minder

Ford’s rear belt minder system alerts the driver when a rear passenger unbuckles by giving audible alerts and visual warnings within the instrument cluster. But, the rear center seat is not included in the rear belt minder in the Maverick, which is a glaring omission. Additionally, the Maverick system differs from other Ford rear belt minders because it doesn’t allow the driver to dismiss the belt minder, which would be helpful if a rear passenger exited the vehicle, or accidently used the wrong buckle.

Advanced rear restraints

The rear outboard seats have seat-belt pretensioners and load-limiters providing additional protection for belted rear occupants.

Warranty

All cars come with basic warranty coverage, also known as a bumper-to-bumper warranty. This protects consumers against unexpected problems with non-wear items. Powertrain warranty protects against engine and transmission troubles. Rust through, or corrosion warranty, covers rust to non-damaged components. Roadside aid provides on-location assistance in case of a breakdown and may include limited towing services.

Extended warranties provide peace of mind. Owners of models known to have worse-than-average predicted reliability can mitigate risks with an extended warranty. Generally, we recommend buying a model with better-than-average reliability and skipping this expensive add on. If you do buy an extended warranty, it is key to read the small print to understand what is covered and where you can bring the car for repairs.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored

JASmith

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Jessica
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Threads
68
Messages
1,597
Reaction score
3,743
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Dodge Ram 1500
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I have a paid subscription to CR…. but to screenshot everything they have published on the Maverick is a pretty big ask….. Might take 15-20+ screenshots. Let me try and see what I can do….. I notice some posters have already posted some of the info already.
Oh wow, I had no idea, I thought it would be like a one page Car&Driver type review and not a paragraph just to describe the cupholders, lol! In thanks I bestow this upon you:

Ford Maverick Consumer Reports Maverick XLT AWD Review Capture.JPG
 

ychuck46

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Chuck
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
223
Reaction score
208
Location
Crossville, TN
Vehicle(s)
F-150 Supercrew w/EcoBoost engine, Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I thought it was a quick, fair review (I am a subscriber). Getting much better mileage than that with our Hybrid Maverick so when they get a chance to rate that they will be impressed.
 

khnMN

Member
First Name
Kyle
Joined
Jan 23, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
7
Reaction score
32
Location
55343
Vehicle(s)
Toyota Rav4
Ford Maverick Consumer Reports Maverick XLT AWD Review 1650923162041

pretty interesting, not a ton of differences overall - very different scores; hard to say Reliability is a known though CR gives a lot of credence to same platforms...
 

WildHorse

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Benny
Joined
Jan 24, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
272
Reaction score
242
Location
DE
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
The verdicts on seats and noise give me a little comfort for choosing Lariat Lux. I did noticed that the clothe seat on XLT felt a little thin and firm.
Sponsored

 
 




Top