- First Name
- Joe
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2024
- Threads
- 9
- Messages
- 682
- Reaction score
- 1,590
- Location
- Squamish, BC
- Vehicle(s)
- 2024 Ford Maverick XLT Tremor
- Engine
- 2.0L EcoBoost
Three points: First, the 25% applies to the value contained in the Customs Declaration Form (CDF). FoMoCo (USA) would be the importer and would pay the Tariff. FoMoCo (USA) has a licensed subsidiary in Mexico (FoMoCo (Mexico)).
If FoMoCo (USA)'s MSRP is $30,000, the value on the CDF would be significantly less (say $20,000)). Hence the Tariff collected by Customs would be $5,000, not $7,500.
How FoMoCo (USA) chooses to pass on the Tariff is unknown.
Second, the value declared on the CDF will only relate to the "value" added in Mexico. If Hermosillo is simply an assembly plant, with engines, transmissions, etc manufactured in the USA (as is required under NAFTA V2.0), then the CDF value may be very low.
Finally, NAFTA 2.0 does not allow the USA to unilaterally impose tariffs without a valid reason. Illegal immigration and drugs are not valid reasons since they have nothing to do with manufacturing.
If FoMoCo (USA)'s MSRP is $30,000, the value on the CDF would be significantly less (say $20,000)). Hence the Tariff collected by Customs would be $5,000, not $7,500.
How FoMoCo (USA) chooses to pass on the Tariff is unknown.
Second, the value declared on the CDF will only relate to the "value" added in Mexico. If Hermosillo is simply an assembly plant, with engines, transmissions, etc manufactured in the USA (as is required under NAFTA V2.0), then the CDF value may be very low.
Finally, NAFTA 2.0 does not allow the USA to unilaterally impose tariffs without a valid reason. Illegal immigration and drugs are not valid reasons since they have nothing to do with manufacturing.
Sponsored
Last edited:
