You might want to reprice that Ranger. Getting a similar Ranger to a $36k Maverick and youāre at $46 to $48k if youāre comparing apples to apples. Why pay more if the Maverick capabilities are all that you need. Itās not made to be compared to a Ranger. The Maverick has the versatility and MPGās that we were looking for. I could have bought either but bought the Maverick because it checked nine out of ten of my need Boxes for a great price.No offense but for about 36k I could spec out a base, 4 dr, 4wd Ranger. I'd do that.
The Maverick I get would be XL only adding the 2.0 and AWD, and would MSRP at 24,700. 10k less than that Ranger. Hence why I've looked at the Maverick.
Sponsored